Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute (콘크리트학회논문집)

Korea Concrete Institute (한국콘크리트학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear Behavior of Large Prestressed Concrete Beams Cast with High Strength Concrete and the Effect of Draped Tendon on their Shear Behavior

고강도 대형 프리스트레스트 콘크리트 보의 전단거동과 경사진 프리스트레싱 긴장재의 영향

  • Kim Kang-Su (Dept. of Architectural engineering, The University of Seoul)
  • 김강수 (서울시립대학교 건축공학과)
  • Published : 2005.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presented four shear test results from experimental tests of two large prestressed concrete beams cast with high strength concrete. In particular, this experiment investigated the effects of draped strands on shear behavior of these full-scaled beams. This study indicated that the use of draped strands increased the ultimate shear capacity as well as the web-shear cracking load. The test results also showed that draped strands reduced strand slip at ends of beams, which represented that these strands were effective to relieve the anchorage stresses. The test results were compared to predictions by two major codes; ACI 318-02 Building Code and AASHTO LRFD(2002). The shear design provisions in these codes provided conservative results on the shear strengths of all test specimens with reasonable margins of safety, and these provisions were particularly more conservative for test specimens having draped strands.

본 논문은 고강도 콘크리트로 타설된 2개의 대형 프리스트레스트 콘크리트 보로부터 얻어진 4개의 전단실험 결과를 고찰하였다. 특히 경사진 프리스트레싱 긴장재가 부재의 전단거동에 미치는 영향을 세밀히 분석하였다. 본 실험에서 경사진 프리스트레싱 긴장재를 사용한 부재는 직선 프리스트레싱 긴장재를 사용한 부재에 비해 높은 초기전단균열강도와 전단강도를 가졌다. 또한 실험 결과는 경사진 프리스트레싱 긴장재의 사용이 부재 단부에서 긴장재의 미끄러짐을 감소시켜주는 것으로 관찰되어 부재 단부에서 크게 요구되는 단부 정착력을 분산시키는데 효과적임을 보여주었다. 실험 결과로부터 얻어진 부재의 전단강도는 ACI 318-02와 AASHTO LRFD의 전단설계기준에 의하여 계산된 값과 비교 분석되었다. 두 전단설계기준은 모든 시험체에 대해 안정적인 전단강도를 제공하였으며, 특히 경사진 프리스트레싱 긴장재를 가진 부재들에 대해서 실험결과에 비해 매우 낮은 전단강도를 제공하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bennett, E. W. and Debaiky, S. Y., High-Strength Steel as Shear Reirrforcement in Prestressed Concrete Beams, Shear in reinforced concrete, SP-42, American Concrete Institute, 1974, pp. 231-248
  2. Cederwall, K., Hedman, O., and Loeberg, A., Shear Strength of Partially Prestressed Beams with Pretensioned Reinforcement cf High Grade Deformed Bars, ACI SP 42-8, Vol.42, No.9, 1974, pp.21S-230
  3. Elzanaty, A. H., Nilson, A. H., and Slate, F. O., 'Shear Capacity of Prestressed Concrete Beams Using High-Strength Concrete', ACI Journal, Proceedings, Vol.83, No.3, May-Jun., 1986, pp. 359-368
  4. Jacob, J. and Russell, B., 'Effects of Horizontal Web Reinforcement on Shear Capacity, Shear Ductility and Strand Anchorage', Transportation Research Board 78th annual Meeting, Jan. 1999, pp.10-14
  5. Kaufman, M. K. and Ramirez, J. A., 'Re-evaluation of the Ultimate Shear Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Prestressed I-Beams', ACI Structural Journal, Vol.85, No.3, May-Jun. 1988, pp.295-303
  6. Gregor, T. and Collins, M. P., 'Tests of large partially prestressed concrete girders', ACI Structural Journal, Vol.92, No.1, 1995, pp.63-72
  7. Shahawy, M. A. and Batchelor, B., 'Shear Behavior of Full-Scale Prestressed Concrete Girders: Comparison between AASHTO Specifications and LRFD Code', PCI Journal, Vol.41, No.3, May-Jun, 1996, pp.48-53 https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011996.48.62
  8. Ma, Z., Tadros, M. K., and Baishya, M., 'Shear Behavior of Pretensioned High-Strength Concrete Bridge I-Girders', ACI Structural Journal, Vol.97, No.1, 2000, pp.185-192
  9. Hartmann, D. L., Breen, J. E., and Kreger, M. E., Shear Cpapcity of High Strength Prestressed Concrete Girders, Research Report 381-2, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Jan. 1988
  10. AbcIalla, O. A., Ramirez, J. A., and Lee, R. H., Strand Debonding in Pretensioned Beams-Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridges with Debonded Strands, Report No. FHWA/INDOT/JHRP-92-25, Part 2 Final Report, Purdue University, Jun. 1993
  11. Roller, J. J., Martin, B. T., Russell, H .G., and Bruce, R. N., 'Performance of Prestressed High Strength Concrete Bridge Girders', PCI Journal, Vol.38, No.3, 1993, pp.35-45
  12. Tawfiq, K. S., Cracking and Shear Capacity of High Strength Concrete Girders, Final Report WPI 050512, FAMU/FSU College of Engineering, Jan. 1995
  13. Oh, B. H., and Kim, K. S., 'Shear Behavior of Full-Scale Post- Tesnioned Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders', ACI Structural Journal, Vol.101, No.2, 2004, pp.176 -182
  14. MacGregor, J. G., Sozen, M. A., and Siess, C. P., 'Effect of Draped Reinforcement on Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Beams', ACI Journal, Vol.32, No.6, Dec. 1960, pp.649-677
  15. MacGregor, J. G., Strength and Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Beams with Web Reinforcement, Doctorate Thesis, Graduate College, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, Jul., 1960, 295pp
  16. Russell, B.W., and Bums, N.H., 'Static and Fatigue Behavior of Pretensioned Composite Bridge Girder Made with High Strength Concrete', PCI Journal, Vol.38, No.3, May-Jun. 1993, pp.116-128 https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011993.116.128
  17. Currming, D. A., Shield, C. K., and French, C. E., Shear Capadty of High-Strength Concrete Prestressed Girders, MN/RC -1998/12, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minneapolis, MN, May, 1998, 291pp
  18. ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (Ag 318-02) and Commentary (ACI 318 R-02), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, 2002, 443pp
  19. AASHTO, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifcations, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2nd ed., Washington, DC, 1998, 1116pp. Including interim revisions for 1999 through 2003
  20. Russell, H. G., Bruce, R. N., and Roller, J. J., 'Shear Tests of High Performance Concrete Bulb-Tee Girders,' 3rd International Symposium on High Performance Concrete, PCI National Bridge Conference, Orlando, FL, Oct. 2003, pp.19-22