Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제18권7호
  • /
  • Pages.915-921
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Population Structure and Genetic Bottleneck Analysis of Ankleshwar Poultry Breed by Microsatellite Markers

  • Pandey, A.K. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources) ;
  • Kumar, Dinesh (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources) ;
  • Sharma, Rekha (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources) ;
  • Sharma, Uma (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources) ;
  • Vijh, R.K. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources) ;
  • Ahlawat, S.P.S. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
  • 투고 : 2004.10.07
  • 심사 : 2005.02.19
  • 발행 : 2005.07.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Genetic variation at 25 microsatellite loci, population structure, and genetic bottleneck hypothesis were examined for Ankleshwar poultry population found in Gujrat, India. The estimates of genetic variability such as effective number of alleles and gene diversities revealed substantial genetic variation frequently displayed by microsatellite markers. The average polymorphism across the studied loci and the expected gene diversity in the population were 6.44 and 0.670${\pm}$0.144, respectively. The population was observed to be significantly differentiated into different groups, and showed fairly high level of inbreeding (f = 0.240${\pm}$0.052) and global heterozygote deficit. The bottleneck analysis indicated the absence of genetic bottleneck in the past. The study revealed that the Ankleshwar poultry breed needs appropriate genetic management for its conservation and improvement. The information generated in this study may further be utilized for studying differentiation and relationships among different Indian poultry breeds.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barker, J. S. F., S. G. Tan, S. S. Moore, T. K. Mukherjee, J. L. Matheson and O. S. Selvaraj. 2001. Genetic variation within and relationships among populations of Asian goats (Capra hircus). J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 118:213-233.
  2. Bassam, B. J., G. Coetano-Anolles and P. M. Gresshoff. 1991. Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 196:80-83.
  3. Boyce, W. M., P. W. Hedrick, N. E. Muggli-Cockett, S. Kalinowski, M. C. Penedo and R. R. Ramey. 1996. Genetic variation of major histocompatibilty complex and microsatellite loci: a comparison in Bighorn sheep. Genet. 145:421-433.
  4. Cheng, H. H. and I. Levin. 1995. Developing of a genetic map of the chicken with markers of high utility. Poult. Sci. 74:1855-1874.
  5. Chenyambuga, S. W., O. Hanotte, J. Hirbo, P. C. Watts, S. J. Kemp, G. C. Kifaro, P. S. Gwakisa, P. H. Petersen and J. E. O. Rege. 2004. Genetic characterization of indigenous goats of Sub-Saharan Africa using microsatellite DNA markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:445-452.
  6. Cho, G. J. and B. W. Cho1. 2004. Microsatellite DNA typing using 16 markers for parentage verification of the Korean native horse. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:750-754.
  7. Christiansen, F. B., O. Frydenberg, A. O. Gyldenholm and V. Simonsen. 1974. Genetics of Zoarces populations VI. Further evidence, based on age group samples, of a heterozygote deficit EST III polymorphism. Heriditas. 77:225-236.
  8. Cornuet, J. M. and G. Luikart. 1996. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genet. 144:2001-2014.
  9. Crooijmans, R. P. M. A. and A. J. A. Van Kampen. 1994. New microsatellite markers on the linkage map of the chicken genome. J. Hered. 85:410-413. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111489
  10. Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., J. J. Van der Poel and M. A. M. Groenen. 1995. Functional genes mapped on the chicken genome. Anim. Genet. 26:73-78.
  11. Di Rienzo, A., A. C. Peterson, J. C. Garza, A. M. Valdes, M. Slatkin, and N. B. Freimer. 1994. Mutational process of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:3166-3170.
  12. FAO. 1995. Global project for the maintenance of domestic animal genetic diversity (MoDAD)-Draft project formulation report, FAO, Rome, Italy.
  13. GAU Report. 2003. Annual Progress Report-2003-04, Network Project on Survey of Poultry Genetic Resources: Ankleshwar poultry, by College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Gujarat Agriculture University, Anand-388 110, INDIA.
  14. Goldstein, D. B. and D. D. Pollock. 1997. Launching microsatellites: a review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic inference. J. Hered. 88:335-342.
  15. Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT (version1.2): A computer programme to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86:485-486.
  16. Kimura, M. and J. W. Crow. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genet. 49:725-738.
  17. Levene, H. 1949. On a matching problem arising in genetics. Ann. Math. Stat. 20:91-94.
  18. Lewontin, R. C. 1972. The apportionment of human diversity. Evol. Biol. 6:381-98.
  19. Li, C. C. 1976. First course in Population Genetics, Boxwood Press, Pacific grove, California.
  20. Li, Changchun, Z. Wang, B. Liu, S. Yang, Z. Zhu, B. Fan, M. Y. Shuhong Zhao and K. Li. 2004. Evaluation of the genetic relationship among ten Chinese indigenous pig breeds with twenty-six microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17: 441-444.
  21. Luikart, G. and J. M. Cornuet. 1998. Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked population form alleles frequency data. Conservation Biology 12:228-237.
  22. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70:3321-3323.
  23. Ohta, T. and M. Kimura. 1973. A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet. Res. Camb. 22:201-204.
  24. Pamilo, P. 1985. Effect of inbreeding on genetic relatedness. Hereditas. 103:195-200.
  25. Pandey, A. K., M. S. Tantia, D. Kumar, B. Mishra, P. Chaudhary and R. K. Vijh. 2002 Microsatellite analysis of three poultry breeds of India, Asian -Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1536-1542.
  26. Queller, D. C. and K. F. Goodnight. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258-275.
  27. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2nd ed, Cold spring Harbour, Cold Spring Laboratory Press, NY.
  28. Sun, W., H. Chang, Z. J. Ren, Z. P. Yang, R. Q. Geng, S. X. Lu, L. Du and K. Tsunoda. 2004. Genetic differentiation between sheep and goats based on microsatellite DNA. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:583-587.
  29. Weir, B. S. and C. C. Cockerham. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
  30. Wimmer, K., S. Ponsuksili, T. Hardge, A. Valle-Zarate, P. K. Mathur and P. Horst. 2000. Genetic distinctness of African, Asian and South American local chickens. Animal Genetics 31:159-165.
  31. Wang, X., H. H. Cao, S. M. Geng and H. B. Li. 2004. Genetic diversity of 10 indigenous pig breeds in China by using microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:1219-1222.
  32. Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations, Vol. 4. Variability within and among Natural Populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  33. Yeh, Francis C., R-C. Yang, Timothy B.J. Boyle, Z-H. Ye and Judy X. Mao. 1999. POPGENE version 1.32, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Canada. (http://www.ualberta.ca/-fyeh/fyeh.).

피인용 문헌

  1. Study on polymorphisms of microsatellite DNA of six Chinese indigenous sheep and goat breeds vol.1, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-007-0078-8
  2. Assessment of Genetic Relatedness of Crossbred Chicken Populations Using Microsatellite Markers vol.48, pp.9-10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-010-9355-y
  3. Genetic Diversity of 14 Indigenous Grey Goose Breeds in China Based on Microsatellite Markers vol.19, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1
  4. Genomic Heterogeneity of Chicken Populations in India vol.21, pp.12, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.80299