Long Term Follow-Up after Skull Base Reconstrucion

두개저부 종양 절제 및 재건 후 장기 추적관찰

  • Jin, Ung Sik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Won Minn, Kyung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Heo, Chan Yeong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • 진웅식 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 민경원 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 허찬영 (분당서울대학교병원 성형외과)
  • Received : 2004.09.30
  • Published : 2005.03.10

Abstract

Skull base tumors have been determined inoperable because it is difficult to accurately diagnose the extent of the involvement and to approach and excise the tumor safely. However, recently, the advent of sophisticated diagnostic tools such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging as well as the craniofacial and neurosurgical advanced techniques enabled an accurate determination of operative plans and safe approach for tumor excision. Resection of these tumors may sometimes result in massive and complex extirpation defects that are not amenable to local tissue closure. The purpose of this study is to analyze experiences of skull base reconstruction and to evaluate long term survival rate and complications. All cranial base reconstructions performed from July 1993 to September 2000 at Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Seoul National University Hospital were observed. The medical records were reviewed and analysed to assess the location of defects, reconstruction method, existence of the dural repair, history of preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, complications and causes of death of the expired patients. There were 12 cases in region II, 8 cases in region I and 1 case in region III according to the Irish classification of skull base. Cranioplasty was performed in 4 patients with a bone graft and microvascular free tissue transfer was selected in 17 patients to reconstruct the cranial base and/or mid-facial defects. Among them, 11 cases were reconstructed with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous free flap, 2 with a latissimus dorsi muscluocutaneous free flap, 1 with a fibular osteocutaneous free flap, 2 with a scapular osteocutaneous free flap, and 1 with a forearm fasciocutaneous free flap, respectively. During over 3 years follow-up, 5 patients were expired and 8 lesions were relapsed. Infection(3 cases) and partial flap loss(2 cases) were the main complications and multiorgan failure(3 cases) by cancer metastasis and sepsis(2 cases) were causes of death. Statistically 4-years survival rate was 68%. A large complex defects were successfully reconstructed by one-stage operation and, the functional results were also satisfactory with acceptable survival rates.

Keywords

References

  1. Urken ML, Catalano PJ, Sen C, Post K, Futran N, Biller HF: Free tissue transfer for skull base reconstruction analysis of complications and a classification scheme for defining skull base defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119: 1318, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1993.01880240054007
  2. Noone Me, Osguthorpe JD, Patel S: Pericranial flap for closure of paramedian anterior skull base defects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127: 494, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2002.129737
  3. Neligan PC, Mulholland S, Irish J, Gullane PJ, Brown D, Freeman J: Flap selection in cranial base reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 98: 1159, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199612000-00005
  4. Neligan PC, Boyd JB: Reconstruction of the cranial base defect. Clin Plast Surg 22: 71, 1995
  5. Chang DW, Langstein HN, Gupta A, De Monte F, Kim AD, Wang X, Robb G: Reconstruction management of cranial base defects after tumor ablation, Plast Reconstr Surg 107: 1346, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200105000-00003
  6. Izquierdo R, Leonetti JP, Origitano TC, Ossama A, Anderson DE, Reichman OH: Refinements using free-tissue transfer for complex cranial base reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 92: 567, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199309001-00001
  7. Marchetti C, Gessaroli M, Cipriani R, Contedini F, Frattarelli M, Staffa C: Use of 'Perforator flaps' in skull base reconstruction after tumor resection. Plast Reconstr Surg 110: 1303, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200210000-00015
  8. Spinelli HM, Persing JA, Walser B: Reconstruction of the cranial base. Clin Plast Surg 22: 555, 1995
  9. Santos LR, Cemea CR, Brandao LG, Siqueira MG, Vellutini EA, Velazco OP, Cruz OL, Morais-Besteiro J, Freita CA: Results and prognostic factors in skull base surgery. Am J Surg 168: 481, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80106-0
  10. Clayman GL, DeMonte F, Jaffe DM, Schusterman MA, Weber RS, Miller MJ, Goepfert H: Outcome and complications of extended cranical-base resection requiring microvascular free-tissue transfer. Arch Otolaryugol Head Neck Surg 121: 1253, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1995.01890110031006
  11. Yamada A, Harii K, Ueda K, Asato H: Free rectus abdominis muscle reconstruction of the anterior skull base. Br J Plast Surg 45: 302, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(92)90057-5
  12. Jones NF, Sekhar LN, Schramm VL: Free rectus abdominis muscle flap reconstruction of the middle and posterior cranial base. Plast Reconstr Surg 78: 481, 1986
  13. Wells MD, Luce EA: Reconstruction of midfacial defects after surgical resection of malignancies. Clin Plast Surg 22: 79, 1995
  14. Langstein HN, Chang DW, Robb GL: Coverage of skull base defects. Clin Plast Surg 28: 375, 2001