Clinical Experience of Exposed Pacemakers

노출된 영구 심박조율기의 치험례

  • Oh, Deuk Young (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Tae Hyung (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Rhie, Jong Won (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lee, Paik Kwon (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Han, Ki Taik (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Ahn, Sang Tae (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Choi, Yun Seok (Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 오득영 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김태형 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이종원 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이백권 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 한기택 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 안상태 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 최윤석 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2005.08.17
  • Published : 2005.11.10

Abstract

In the cases of severe arrythmia and conduction failure, a permanent implanted pacemaker is considered an essential treatment modality with less complication rate, broad indications and low morbidity. However, some pacemakers needs to be removed or replaced due to infection, in need of a lead upgrade, elective replacement, conduction failure or insulation failure. The most common indication for pacemaker extraction is infection. Conservative treatments such as administration of intravenous antibiotics and limitation of debridement are not effective and the removal of the entire pacing system is considered to be the best approach to pacemaker pocket infection. Although a locking stylet, a laser sheath and other newer methods of transvenous lead extraction have been proven to be effective, all leads cannot be removed. Moreover, major complications such as, cardiac tamponade and respiratory arrest during leads extraction procedure should not be ignored. We experienced two cases of exposed pacemakers in the subclavicular region. After removing the pacemaker body, exposed proximal lead was pulled out and cut off. The end of remnant external insulation tube was tied to prevent infection propagation between external insulation tube and inner metalic coil. Wounds were covered by local flap coverage. No other problems were detected during the one-year follow-up. Since there are few reports on lead-preserving method of treating limited infection of exposed pacemakers, we would like to present our new method for treating exposed pacemakers.

Keywords

References

  1. Golan J, Sterenberg N, Farkash T, Ben-Hur N: A new technique for treating the exposed cardiac pacemaker wires in the supraclavicular region. Plast Reconstr Surg 67: 74, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198101000-00019
  2. Saad EB, Saliba WI, Schweikert RA, Al-khadra AS, Abdul-karim A, Niebauer MJ, Wilkoff BL: Nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator lead extraction: Results and comparison with extraction of pacemaker leads. Pace 26: 1944, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00300.x
  3. Rio AD, Anguera I, Mi개 JM, Mont L, Fowler VG, Azqueta M, Mestres CA: Surgical treatment of pacemaker and defibrillator lead endocarditis. CHEST 124: 1451, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.124.4.1451
  4. Nakamoto S, Oka H, Zhang Z, Onoe M, Kaneda T, Inoue T, Saga T: Intravascular extraction of permanent pacemaker leads. Surg Today 32: 947, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950200190
  5. Yamada M, Takeuchi S, Shiojiri Y, Maruta K, Oki A, Iyano K, Takaba T: Surgical lead-p reserving procedures for pacemaker pocket infection. Ann Thorac Surg 74: 1494, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03949-8
  6. Ku GW, Kang SK, Won TH, Kim SW, Yu JH, Na MH, Lim SP, Lee Y: Endocarditis with intracardiac migration of transvenous permanent pacing lead: 1 case report. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 35: 831, 2002