식물분류학회지 (Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy)

  • 제35권4호
  • /
  • Pages.247-272
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 1225-8318(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1546(eISSN)
한국식물분류학회 (The Korean Society of Plant Taxonomists)
권호 표지

고광나무분류군(Philadelphus schrenkii complex)의 실체에 대한 형태 고찰

Taxonomic reconsideration of the Philadelphus schrenkii complex

  • 박하늘 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부 및 수목원) ;
  • 김휘 (목포대학교 응용생명과학부) ;
  • 이흥수 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부 및 수목원) ;
  • 장진성 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부 및 수목원)
  • Park, Sky (The Arboretum and Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Hui (Department of Medicinal Plants Resources, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Lee, Heung-Soo (The Arboretum and Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chang, Chin-Sung (The Arboretum and Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2005.10.04
  • 심사 : 2005.12.05
  • 발행 : 2005.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

한반도에는 고광나무속 식물로 애기고광나무, 얇은잎고광, 고광나무, 섬고광나무, 흰털고광, 털고광나무, 서울고광 등(모두 Philadelphus schrenkii complex로 지칭)이 보고되는데, 본 연구는 이들 종간 식별형질로 알려진 암술대와 화반의 털, 꽃받침통의 털, 잎에 난 털 등, 각 형질의 변이를 조사하여 분류학적 실체를 재고찰하였다. 애기고광(P. pekinensis)은 잎과 화서, 소화경, 꽃받침통 등 식물체 전반에 털이 거의 없고, 잎 앞면, 뒷면, 주맥에 난 털이 매우 적어 다른 분류군들과 쉽게 구별이 되지만, 기존 연구와 달리 화서에 달리는 꽃의 개수(애기고광 (5)7-9(11)개 vs 다른 종 5-7개)가 많고, 꽃받침통이 다소 작으며 (나비 2.5-3 mm vs. (2.5)3-4(5.9) mm), 암술대가 얕게 갈라지는 등의 특징에 있어 다른 분류군들과 뚜렷이 구별되었다. 반면, 고광나무(P. schrenkii var. schrenkii)와 그 근연종으로는 꽃받침통에 털이 많고, 암술대에서 화반까지 털이 나타나는 털고광나무(P. schrenkii var. jackii), 엽저가 평저에 가깝고 잎 모양이 아원형인 왕고광나무(P. schrenkii var. mandshuricus), 잎, 암술대와 화반에 털이 많이 존재하는 흰털고광(P. lasiogynus) 등이 존재하는데, 소화경, 잎 앞 뒷면 털의 밀도는 흰털고광-털고광-고광나무 순으로 변이 폭이 연속, 중첩하였고, 화반의 털은 고광나무-흰털고광-털고광에서도 확인되어, 모두 고광나무의 변이체로 판단된다. 한편, 꽃받침통에만 털이 발달하는 얇은잎고광(P. tenuifolius)는 특히 잎에 털이 많은 개체를 서울고광(P. seoulensis)으로 분리되었는데, 본 연구 결과 화서, 화반, 암술대, 꽃받침통의 털이 변이가 얇은잎고광과 중첩되어 별개 독립종으로 처리하는 것은 무리라고 판단된다. 한반도 남부 도서 지역에 고유종으로 언급되는 섬고광나무(P. scaber)는 수피[박리(剝離) 현상]가 벗겨지지 않으면서 예거치의 발달, 암술대가 뒤로 젖혀져 갈라지는 특징도 얇은잎고광의 극단적 변이체로 생각된다. 본 연구결과, 얇은잎고광, 고광나무, 애기고광 등 3종으로 정리하였으며, 분포에서는 애기고광만이 남부지방에 주로 분포하며, 얇은잎고광과 고광나무는 비교적 한반도 전체에 분포함을 확인하였다.

The Philadelphus schrenkii complex including P. schrenkii var. schrenkii, P. schrenkii var. jackii, P. schrenkii var. mandshuricus, P. tenuifolius, P. pekinensis, P. seoulensis, P. lasiogynus, and P. scaber, is distributed in China, Korea, japan, and far eastern Russia. Their taxonomic delimitations are obscure because quantitative characters, such as presence/absence and density of hair on leaf, petiole, style, disc, calyx-tube, and pedicel, are highly variable with no apparent characteristics that consistently distinguish from each other within the group. Thus, these morphological characters are reexamined using univariate analyses. P. pekinenesis is distinct from other taxa in having glabrous disk, calyx, pedicel, and leaf blade. In addition, the number of flowers in an inflorescence [(5)7-9(11) vs 5-7 in other taxa], smaller calyx tube [2.5-3 mm vs. (2.5)3-4(5.9) in other taxa], and slightly divided styles help distinguish P. pekinenesis from other related taxa in Korea. However, P. schrenkii var. schrenkii, P. schrenkii var. jackii, P. schrenkii var. mandshuricus, and P. lasiogynus show continuous variation in the pubescence of disk, calyx, pedicel, and leaf blade, and this may reflect a lack of divergence among them. Particular emphases are placed on P. tenuifolius and P. seoulensis, because of the high degree of morphological intergradation with respect to the degree of pubescence in disk, calyx, pedicel, and leaf blade and their inconsistent circumscription across various systematic treatments. P. scaber, distributed in the southern Korea, has often been treated as an independent species having exfoliated branchlets, distinct serrated leaf margin, and recurved styles. However, this current study suggests that P. scaber should be recognized as a form of P. tenuifolius because these distinguishing characters are continuous between P. tenuifolius and P. scaber. In geographical distribution, P. pekinensis is mainly distributed in the southern part of Korea, while P. tenuifoilus and P. schrenkii are commonly found all over the country.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 환경부

참고문헌

  1. Bangham, W. 1929. The chromosomes of some speCles of the genus Philadelphus. J. Arnold Arbor. 10: 167-9
  2. Bohm, B. R., K. W. Nicholls, and U. G. Bhat. 1985. Flavonoids of the Hydrangeaceae Dumortier. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 13: 441-445 https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-1978(85)90090-0
  3. Chang, C. S. 2001. Reconsideration of Acer pictum complex in eastern Asia. Korean J. PI. Taxon. 31: 283-309 (in Korean). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2001.31.3.283
  4. Chang, C. S. and H. Kim. 2003. An analysis of morphological variation of Acer tschonoskii complex in eastern Asia: Implications of inflorescence size and the number of flowers within section Macrantha. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 143:29-42 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00191.x
  5. Charkevicz, S. S. 1991. Plantae Vasculares Orentis Extremi Sovietici. Vol. 5. Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian)
  6. Chung, T. H. 1943. Korean Woody Flora. Yeon-gu-sco-rim. Seoul (in Japanese)
  7. Chung, Y. H. and H. Shin. 1991a. Philadelphus seoulensis, a new species of Philadelphus from Korea (Saxifragaceae). Korean J. PI. Taxon. 21: 211-216 (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.1991.21.3.211
  8. Chung, Y. H. and H. Shin. 1991b. A taxonomic study on the genus Philadelphus in Korea. Korean J. PI. Taxon. 21: 251-266(in Korean) https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.1991.21.4.251
  9. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Glowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York
  10. Frazier, C. K. 1999. A taxonomic study of Philadelphus (Hydrangeaceae) as it occurs in New Mexico. The New Mexico Botanist 13: 1-8
  11. Hu, S. Y. 1954. A monograph of the genus Philadelphus. J. Arnold Arbor. 35: 275-333 https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.8320
  12. Hu, S. Y. 1955a. A monograph of the genus Philadelphus. J. Arnold Arbor. 36: 52-109 https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.24326
  13. Hu, S. Y. 1955b. A monograph of the genus Philadelphus. J. Arnold Arbor. 36: 325-368
  14. Hu, S. Y. 1956. A monograph of the genus Philadelphus. J. Arnold Arbor. 37: 15-90 https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.25735
  15. Hufford, L. 1995. Seed morphology of Hydrangeaceae and its phylogenetic implications. Int. J. PI. Sci. 156: 555-80
  16. Hufford, L. 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of Hydrangeaceae based on morphological data. Int. J. PI. Sci. 158: 652-72
  17. Hufford, L. 1998. Early development of androecia In polystemonous Hydrangeaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 1057-1067 https://doi.org/10.2307/2446339
  18. Hufford, L., M. L. Moody and D. E. Soltis. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of Hydrangeaceae based on sequences of the plastid gene matK and their combination with rbcL and morphological data. Int. J. PI. Sci. 162: 835-846 https://doi.org/10.1086/320789
  19. Huang, S. M. Ohba, S. Akiyama. 2001. Philadelphus In Flora of China. Vol. 8 (Brassicaceae through Saxifragaceae). Flora of China Editorial Committee (eds.). Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis
  20. Hwang, S. M. 1995. Philadelphus In Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Vol. 35(1). Lu, L. T. and S. M. Hwang (eds.), Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
  21. Hwang, S. M. 2003. Philadelphus. In Higher Plants of China. Vol. 6. Fu L.K., T-I. Chen, K-Y. Lang, T-O. Hong, and Q. Lin. (eds.). Qingdao Publishing House. Qingdao (in Chinese)
  22. lm, R. J. 1997. Flora Coreana Vol. 3. The Science and Technology Publishing House, Pyongyang (in Korean)
  23. Kriissmann, G. 1978. Manual of Cultivated Broad-Leaved Trees & Shrubs. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon
  24. Lee, T. B. 1980. Illustrated Flora of Korea. Hyang-mun-sa, Seoul (in Korean)
  25. Lee, W. T. 1996. Lineamenta Florae Koreae. Academy Publishing Company, Seoul (in Korean)
  26. Lee, Y. N. 1996. Flora of Korea. Kyo-hak Publishing Co LTD., Seoul (in Korean)
  27. Linneaus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. Holmiae, Stockholm
  28. Nakai, T. 1915. Philadelphus Japono-Coreanae. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 29: 63-67 (in Japanese) https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.29.341_63
  29. Nakai, T. 1926. Flora Sylvatica Koreana. Vol. 15. Pp 50-56 (in Japanese)
  30. Nakai, T. 1943. Notulae ad Plantas Asiae Orientalis (XXIX). J. Jap. Bot. 19: 361-380 (in Japanese)
  31. Nam, S. K. 2005. Red Data Book of DPR Korea. Minchuchosensa, Pyongyang
  32. Ohba, H. and S. Akiyama. 2001. Genus Philadelphus In Flora of Japan Vol. 2b. Iwatsuki, K., D. E. Boufford, and H. Ohba. (eds.) Kodasha LTD., Tokyo
  33. Ohwi, J. 1984. Flora of Japan. Smithsonian Institution. Washiongton D. C
  34. Pojarkova, A. I. 1985. Philadelphus. In Flora of USSR, Vol. IX. Rosales and Sarraceniales. Komarov, V. L. and S. V. Yuzepchuk (eds.), Pp. 170-173. Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem
  35. Rehder, A. 1940. Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs. The Macmilian Company, New York
  36. Rehder, A. 1949. Bibiliography of Cultivated Trees and Shrub. The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard Unversity Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, USA
  37. SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Ver. 6. Cary, SAS Institute INC., North Carolina
  38. Soltis, D. E., Q. Y. Xiang and L. Hufford. 1995. Relationships and evolution of Hydrangeaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 82: 504-14 https://doi.org/10.2307/2445698
  39. Spongberg, S. A. 1972. The genera of Saxifragaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 53: 409-98
  40. Styer, C. H. and W. L. Stern, 1979. Comparative anatomy and systematics of woody Saxifragaceae. Philadelphus. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 267-289 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1979.tb01818.x
  41. Takhtajan, A. 1986. Floristic Regions of the World. University of California Press, Berkeley
  42. Willis, J. C. 1985. A Dictionary of the Flowering Plants and Ferns. 8th Edition. Cambridge University Press, New York
  43. 정태현 1957. 한국식물도감 상권 목본부. 신지사, 서울
  44. 鏑木徳二. 1940. 鮮滿實用林業便覧, 養賢堂, 東京
  45. 南滿洲鐵道株式會社 總務部調査課. 1939. コマロフ滿洲植物誌. Vol.4. 大阪每日新聞社. 大阪