The Role of Pericranial Flap in Surgery of Craniosynostosis

두개골 조기 유합증 수술 시 두개골막 피판의 역할

  • Byeon, Jun-Hee (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Yim, Young-Min (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoo, Gyeol (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • 변준희 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 임영민 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 유결 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2004.08.02
  • Published : 2005.03.10

Abstract

Reconstruction of calvarial bone defects from congenital anomaly or from bone loss due to traumatic or neoplastic processes remains a significant problem in craniofacial surgery and neurosurgery. To facilitate bone regeneration, there have been many trials such as autologous bone graft or allograft, and the addition of demineralized bone matrix and matrix-derived growth factor. Guided bone regeneration is one of the methods to accelerate bone healing for calvarial bone defects especially in children. Pericranium is one of the most usable structure in bone regeneration. It protects the dura and sinus, and provides mechanical connection between bone fragments. It supplies blood to bone cortex and osteoprogenitor cells and enhances bone regeneration. For maximal effect of pericranium in bone regeneration, authors used pericranium as a flap for covering calvarial defects in surgeries of 11 craniosynostosis patients and achieved satisfactory results: The bone regeneration of original cranial defect in one year after operation was 74.6%(${\pm}8.5%$). This pericranial flap would be made more effectively by individual dissection after subgaleal dissection rather than subperiosteal dissection. In this article, we reviewed the role of pericranium and reported its usefulness as a flap in surgery of craniosynostosis to maximize bone regeneration.

Keywords

References

  1. Gosain AK, Santoro TD, Song LS, Capel CC, Sudhakar PV, Matloub HS: Osteogenesis in calvarial defects: contribution of the dura, the pericranium, and the surrounding bone in adult versus infant animals. Plast Reconstr Surg 112: 515, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000070728.56716.51
  2. Hobar PC, Masson JA, Wilson R, Zerwekh J: The impotance of the dura in craniofacial surgery. Plast Recolustr Surg 92: 405, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199309000-00003
  3. Hammerle CH, Schmid J, Lang NP, alah AJ: Temporal dymamics of healing in rabbit cranial defects using guided bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53: 167, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90396-8
  4. Linde A, Thoren C, Dahlin C, Sandberg E: Creation of new bone by an osteopromotive membrane technique: an experimental study in rats. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51: 892, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80111-9
  5. Reid, CA, McCarthy JG, Kolber AB: A study of regeneration in parietal bone defects in rabbits. Plast Recollstr Surg 67: 591, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198105000-00002
  6. Greenwald JA, Mehrara BJ, Spector JA, Chin GS, Steinbrech DS, Saadeh PB, Luchs JS, Paccione MF, Gittes GK, Longaker MT: Biomolecular mechanisms of calvarial bone induction: immature versus mature dura mater. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 1382, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200004040-00018
  7. Eyre-Brook AI: The periosteum: Its function reassessed. Clin Orthop 89: 300, 1984