Comparison of Phosphorus and Nitrogen Removal Characteristics between A2/O and Modified Phostrip Processes

A2/O공정과 수정 Phostrip공정과의 질소 및 인제거 특성비교

  • Kim, Kwang-Soo (Construction Environment Research Dept., Korea Institute of Construction Technology) ;
  • Kim, I-Tai (Construction Environment Research Dept., Korea Institute of Construction Technology)
  • 김광수 (한국건설기술연구원 건설환경연구부) ;
  • 김이태 (한국건설기술연구원 건설환경연구부)
  • Received : 2005.08.08
  • Accepted : 2005.10.18
  • Published : 2005.11.30

Abstract

An experimental study for the comparison of nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiencies between $A^2/O$ and modified Phostrip (M-Phostrip process) were carried out with bench-scale reactors. In case of nitrogen removal efficiencies both of processes showed similar ones when influent organic loadings were high. However, M-phostrip process was more effective than $A^2/O$ at low organic loadings. This is why M-phostrip process consumes the whole mass of influent organics as a carbon sources for denitrification in anoxic reactor but the anoxic reactor of $A^2/O$ process utilizes the residual carbon followed by consumming a part of influent carbon for phosphorus release in anaerobic reactor. $A^2/O$ process required the influent COD/T-P and COD/TKN ratios were more than 56 and 10, respectively, to take place the phosphorus release in anaerobic process and phosphorus uptake in oxic process. However, the luxury uptake of phosphorus in M-phostrip process was not affected by influent COD/T-P and COD/TKN ratios and the adverse effect of nitrate in return sludge introduced to the p-stripper from the 2nd clarifier was not significant due to the configurational advantage of the p-stripper.

Keywords

References

  1. 전항배, 이용택, 신항식, 유기물질이 인제거 특성에 미치는 영향, 상하수도학회지, 8(2), pp. 25-34 (1994)
  2. Eikelboom, I. D., Biosorption & Prevention of Bulking Sludge by Means of a High Floc Loading, Eater Research Centre, pp. 163-173 (1980)
  3. Kim, K. S., Joe, K. M., and Choi, H. C., Pilot Study on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal by a Modified Phostrip Process, Water Sci. and Tech., 42(3-4), pp. 199-206 (2000)
  4. Kuba, T., Vanloosdrecht, M. C. M., and Heijnen, J. J., Occurence of DenitritYing Phosphorus Removing Bacteria in Modified UCT-Type Wastewater Treatment Plants, Wat. Res., 31(4), pp. 777-786 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00370-3
  5. Levin, G. V. et aI., Phosphate Stripping of Sewage, USA patent 4,141,822 (1979)
  6. Marais, G. v. R., Loewenthal, R. E., and Siebritz, I. P., Observations Supporting Phosphate Removal by Biological Excess Uptake-A Review, Wat. Sci. Tech., 15, pp. 15-41 (1983)
  7. Ostgaard, K., Chrisrensson, M., Jonsson, K., and Welander, T., Anoxic Biological Phosphorus Removal in a Full-Scale UCT Process, Wat. Res., 11(4), pp. 2719-2726 (1997)
  8. Siebritz, I. P., Ekama, G. A., and Marais, G. V. R., Parametric Model for Biological Excess Phosphorus Removal, presented at the I.W.P.R. Post Conference Seminar on Phosphate Removal, Pretoria (1982)