Perineal Reconstruction with the Perineal Perforator Based Island Flap

회음 천공지 기저 도서형 피판을 이용한 회음부 재건

  • Lee, Hae Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Jeong Tae (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Hwang, Weon Joong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
  • 이혜민 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김정태 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 황원중 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2004.09.06
  • Published : 2005.01.10

Abstract

Perineal area is composed of compact structures of urogenital organs and anus requiring a more sophisticated selection of flap and reconstruction. For achieving better outcome then conventional flap surgery, we use the perineal perforator based island flap for its reconstruction. After locating the perforator by Doppler, the flaps were designed according to the defect or expected vaginal orifice. The flaps were elevated bilaterally as island pattern. Finally defect or neovagina was reconstructed with inconspicious linear scar hidden in the inguinal crease. Five cases were performed with the perineal perforator based island flap. There were 3 cases of vulvar cancer, 1 case of transsexualism, and 1 case of ambiguous genitalia because of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Operative results were satisfactory with good contouring and less prominent donor scar, when they were compared with other flap reconstructions such as latissimus dorsi perforator flap, groin flap, gracilis myocutaneous flap etc. The perineal perforator based island flap is highly recommended with the advantages of easy flap elevation, good rotation arc, and appropriate flap thickness for contouring. Compared with other conventional flaps, it can be selected as a good option for moderate defect of perineal area.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee PK, Choi MS, Oh DY, Lee JW, Ahn ST: Vulvoperieneal Reconstruction Using Various Fasciocutaneous Flaps J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 31: 479, 2004
  2. Wee JT, Joseph VT: A new technique of vaginal reconstruction using neurovascular pudendal-thigh flaps: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 4: 701, 1989
  3. Goldwyn RM: History of attempts form a vagina. Plast Reconstr Surg 59: 319, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197703000-00002
  4. McCraw JB, Massey FM, Shanklin KD, Horton CE: Vaginal reconstruction with gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 58: 176, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197608000-00006
  5. Park CS, Moon JH, Lee NH, Yang KM: Gluteal Fold Fasciocutaneous Turnover Flap for Reconstruction of Perineum and Vaginal Wall J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 29: 475, 2002
  6. Oosterlinck W, Monstrey S: The pudendal thigh fasciocutaneous flap to cover deep perineal defects, combined with reconstruction of the posterior urethra. BJU Int 89: 133, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02448.x
  7. Gurlek A, Monstrey S, Prof S: The versatility of the pudendal thigh fasciocutaneous flap used as an island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 109: 402, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200201000-00077
  8. Giraldo F, Mora MJ, Solano A, Abehsera M, Ferron M, Smith JM: Anatomic study of the superficial perineal neurovascular pedicle: implications in vulvoperineal flap design. Plast Reconstr Surg 1: 100, 1997
  9. Giraldo F: Cutaneous Neovaginoplasty using the Malaga flap (Vulvoperineal Fasciocutaneous flap): a 12-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 111: 1249, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000046036.29786.F4
  10. Gurlek A, Evans GR: The Malaga flap for vaginoplasty in the Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: experience and early-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg 100: 806, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199709000-00046
  11. Shigenobu S,Shugo S,Hideo H: A Subcutaneous Pedicle Flap for Perineal Reconstruction Ann Plas Surg 22: 440, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198905000-00010
  12. Knol AC, Hage JJ: The infragluteal skin flap: a new option for reconstruction in the perineogenital area. Plast Reconstr Surg 99: 1954, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199706000-00022