토양세척용매의 종류 및 농도에 따른 폐금속광산 폐기물내 중금속의 추출특성

Evaluation on Extractability of Heavy Metals in Mine Tailings of Disused Metal Mines with Concentrations and Kinds of Soil Washing Solutions

  • 김정대 (한림성심대학 보건환경과) ;
  • 남궁완 (건국대학교 차세대환경기술센터)
  • Kim, Joung-Dae (Department of Health & Environment, Hallym College) ;
  • NamKoong, Wan (Innovative Environmental Technology Center, Konkuk University)
  • 발행 : 2005.08.31

초록

본 연구에서는 폐광산지역에서 발생되는 폐기물인 광미를 대상으로 토양세척공정을 이용하여 다양한 세척용매와 농도, 그리고 추출시간에 따른 중금속의 추출특성을 파악하였다. 세척용매로는 물, HCl(0.1, 0.3, 1.0 N), EDTA(0.01, 0.05, 0.1 M), SDS(0.1, 0.5, 1.0%)를 이용하였다. 그 결과, 물과 SDS 용매에서 Zn과 Cd이 Pb과 Cu보다 높은 추출효율을 보였지만, 전체적으로는 1%이하로 중금속의 추출에 효과적이지 못하였다. 그러나, SDS에서 Pb과 Cu의 추출효율은 추출시간이 길어질수록 증가하였다. HCl과 EDTA를 이용한 중금속의 추출은 물과 SDS보다 빠른 추출경향을 보였고, 대부분의 중금속이 6시간 이내에 추출되었으며 용매의 농도와 무관하였다. 6시간 이후에는 느린 추출경향을 보였지만 세척용매의 농도에 따라 좌우되었다. 또한, 용매의 농도가 증가할수록 추출경향은 빨라졌고, 추출 효율도 증가하였다. 추출효율은 1.0 N HCl에서 Cd>Pb>Zn>Cu로, 0.1M EDTA에서 Pb>Cd>Zn>Cu 순으로 높았다. 농도증가에 따른 추출효과는 HCl에서 Pb이, EDTA에서 Pb과 Cd이 가장 컸으며, 중금속제거를 위한 6시간이상의 추출은 비효과적이었다.

The objectives of this study were to assess extraction kinetics of heavy metals with extraction times and to assess extraction efficiencies of heavy metals with concentrations and kinds of washing solutions. Target materials were obtained from disused metal mines. Washing solutions were water, HCl(0.1, 0.3, 1.0 N), EDTA(0.01, 0.05, 0.1 M), and sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS, 0.1. 0.5, 1.0%). Extraction efficiencies of heavy metals by water and SDS were below 1%, and extraction efficiencies of Zn and Cd were higher than those of Pb and Cu. As results, water and SDS were not effective in extracting heavy metals from mine tailings as washing solution, but extraction efficiencies of Pb and Cu with SDS solution increased as extraction time increased. Extraction kinetics of heavy metals with HCl and EDTA were faster than those with water and SDS. The majority of heavy metals were extracted within 6 hours, and extraction kinetics was almost independent of the solution concentration. Extraction kinetics of heavy metals after 6 hours was slow, but extraction kinetics was dependent on the solution concentration. Also, as concentrations of HCl and EDTA solution were stronger, heavy metals were extracted rapidly and extraction efficiencies were increased. The extraction efficiency was high in order of Cd>Pb>Zn>Cu in using 1.0 N HCl, and Pb>Cd>Zn>Cu in using 0.1 M EDTA. Consequently, extraction effectiveness was highest for Pb in using HCl, and for Pb and Cd in using EDTA with concentration increase. Extraction time of over 6 hours was not effective in extracting heavy metals.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Heavy metals in soil Alloway, B.J.
  2. Journal of Environmental Quality v.21 Distribution and partitioning of trace metals in contaminated soils near Leadville, Colorado Levy, D.B.;Barbarick, K.A.;Siemer, E.G.;Sommers, L.E. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1992.00472425002100020006x
  3. European Journal of Soil Science v.48 Solubility control of Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb, in contaminated soils Mcbride, M.B.;Sauve, S.;Hendershot, W. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00554.x
  4. J Environ. Eng. no.March Evaluation and analysis of soil washing for seven lead-contaminated soils Vanbenschoten, J.E.;Mastumoto, M.R.;Young, W.H.
  5. J Environ. Qual. v.15 no.3 Competitive adsorption of heavy metals by soils Elliott, J.A.;Liberati, M.R.;Huang, C.P. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1986.00472425001500030002x
  6. Soil Washing을 이용한 폐광산에서 발생되는 광미 및 주변오염토양 처리 김정태
  7. 한국토양환경학회지 v.4 no.2 폐금속광산 광미 및 주변 오염토양 세정에 관한 연구 이동호;박옥현
  8. 한국지하수토양환경학회지 v.9 no.4 토양세척에 의한 비소 및 중금속 오염토양의 복원 고일원;이철효;이광표;김경응
  9. Soil Flushing을 이용한 중금속 오염토양 정화 고병익
  10. 한국지하수토양환경학회지 v.9 no.4 EDTA와 붕산 혼합용출제를 이용한 중금속으로 오염된 토양의 처리에 관한 연구(I): 납 이종열;김용수;권영호;공성호;박선영;이창환;성혜련
  11. 한국지하수토양환경학회지 v.9 no.4 EDTA와 붕산 혼합용출제를 이용한 중금속으로 오염된 토양의 처리에 관한 연구(II): 카드륨 및 크롬 이종열;김용수;권영호;공성호;박신영;이창환;성혜련
  12. Innovative technology evaluation report; BIOGENESISTM Soil washing technology, EPA/540/R-93/510 USEPA
  13. Tcehnology evaluation report: Rcmediation of metals-contaminated soils and grouridwater Evanko, C.R.;Dzombak, D.A.
  14. Report: Recent developements for in situ treatment of metal contaminated soils USEPA
  15. 토양화학분석법 농업기술연구소
  16. Methods of soil analysis Black, C.A.;Evans, D.D.;Ensminger, L.E.;White, J.L.;Clark, F.E.;Dinauer, R.C.
  17. Soil Science Plant Nutrition v.26 Relationship bel\veen cation exchange capacity and degree of maturity of city refuse composts Harada, Y.;Inoko, A. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1980.10431220
  18. J. Environ. Qual. v.25 Forms of cadmium, lead, and zinc in contaminated soils from southwest poland Chlopecka, A.;Bacon, J. R.;Willson, M.J.;Kay, J. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500010009x
  19. Method of analysis for heavy metals in soils;Heavy Metal in Soil Ure, A.M.;Allmvay, B.J.(ed.)
  20. 환경복원 및 재생기술:폐광산 복원기술 과학기술부
  21. Efficiencies of soil washing/flushing solutions for the remediation or lead contaminated soils Cline, S.R.
  22. Treatment of soils contaminated with heavy metals;}Metal Speciation and Contamination of Soil Peters, R.W.;Shem, L.;Allen, H.E.(ed.);Huang, C.P.)ed.);Bailey, G.W.(ed.);Bowers, A.R.(ed.)
  23. 오염토양분석, Workshop 중금속 분석용 용출시험법의 개선의 위한 제안 윤양희;김선태
  24. Water Environment Research v.66 no.2 Metal removal by soil washing tor an iron oxide coated sandy soil Vanbenschoten, J.E.;Reed, B.E.;Mastumoto, M.R.;McGarvey, P.J. https://doi.org/10.2175/WER.66.2.11
  25. Environ. Eng. Sci. v.14 no.2 Comparison of solvents for ex situ removal of chromium and lead from contaminated soil Piehtel, J.;Pichtel, T.M. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.1997.14.97
  26. Environmenfal Progress v.18 no.1 On the use of biosurtaclants lor lhe removal of heavy metals from oil-contaminated soil Mulligan, C.N.;Yang, R.N.;Gibbs, B.F. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670180120
  27. Water Science and Technology v.37 no.8 Surfactant enhanced remediation of cadmium contaminated soils Doong, R.A.Wu, Y.W.;Lei, W.G.
  28. CERCLA BDAT Standard Analytical Refference Matrix(SARM) preparation and results of physical soils washing experiments Esposito, M.P.;Locke, B.B.;Greber, J.;Traver, R.P.
  29. 한국토양환경학회지 v.2 no.3 구봉광산 주변 중금속의 분포 양상 및 인근농경지와 하천수계에 미치는 영향 이도경;정덕영;이규승
  30. 자원환경지질 v.32 no.1 휴/폐광 금은광산 주변의 토양오염조사와 복구 시스템 연구 정명채
  31. 광산지질 v.3 no.3 구봉광산의 지질과 광상 전찬규;오민수
  32. 금은 광산활동에 의한 비소 및 중금속 환경오염과 광산폐기물 격리저장 처리기법 안주성
  33. Lead, Metals and their compounds in the environmental Ewers, U.;Schlipkoter, H.W.;Merian, E.(ed.)
  34. Trace elements in soils and plants Kabata, P.A.;Pendias, H.
  35. 한국토양환경학회지 v.4 no.1 구봉광산 주변 토양에서의 중금속과 시안의 분포 김선태;윤양희;박제안;심의섭
  36. Monitoring and risk assessment of contaminated soils around mining areas by sequential extraction analysis Kim, K.G.
  37. 토양오염조사 및 광해방지 시스템연구, 연구보고서, 광진 96-4
  38. J. Environ. Eng. no.October Lead removal from soils via bench-scale soil washing techniques Cline, S.R.;Reed, B.E.
  39. Environ. Technol. Left. v.11 Extraction kinetics of six heavy metals from contaminated clay soils Tuin, B.J.W.;Tels, M. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593339009384895
  40. Water Environ. Technol. v.66 no.2 Effects of iron oxides on soil washing a metal contaminated sandy soil Van Benschoten, J.E.;Reed, B.E.;Mastumoto, M.R.;McGarvey, P.J.
  41. J. Environ. Qual. v.13 no.3 Chemical partiti.ming cadmium, copper, nickel and zinc in soils and sediments containing high levels of heavy metals Hickey, M.G.;Kittrick, J.A. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1984.00472425001300030010x
  42. J. Environ Eng. v.124 no.7 Ex-Situ eemediation of a metal-contaminated superfund soil using selective extractants Steele, M.C.;Pichtel, J. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:7(639)
  43. Cadmium : Heavy Metals in Soils Alloway, B.J.
  44. Principles and applications of metal chelatio;Oxford Chemistry Series Bell, C.F.
  45. Water. Air. and Soil Pollution v.34 Cadmium sorption at low concentrations: evidence of competition by other heavy metals Christensen, T.H. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00193777