The Effect of Buoyancy Orientation on Flow Structures in Turbulent Channel Flow using DNS

  • El-Samni Osama (Advance Ship Engineering Research Center, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yoon HyunSik (Advance Ship Engineering Research Center, Pusan National University) ;
  • Chun Ho Hwan (Advance Ship Engineering Research Center, Pusan National University)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

The effect of buoyancy orientation on turbulent channel flow has been investigated using DNS (direct numerical simulation). Grashof number is kept at 9.6 $\times 10^{5}$ while changing the orientation of the buoyancy vector to be parallel or perpendicular to the channel walls. Four study cases can be distinguished during this research namely; streamwise, wall-normal unstable stratification, wall-normal stable stratification and spanwise oriented buoyancy. The driving mean pressure gradient used in all cases is adjusted to keep mass flow rate constant while friction Reynolds number is around 150. At this Grashof number, the skin friction shows decrement in the unstable and stable stratification and increment in the other two cases. Analyses of the changes of flow structure for the four cases are presented highlighting on the mean quantities and second order statistics.

Keywords

References

  1. Dol, H.S., K. Hanjalic, and S. Kenjeres. 1997. A comparative assessment of the second-moment differential and algebraic models in turbulent natural convection. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow, 18, 4-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-727X(96)00149-X
  2. Dol, H.S., K. Hanjalic, and T.A.M. Versteegh. 1999. A DNS-based thermal second-moment closure for buoyant convection at vertical walls. J. Fluid Mech, 391, 211-247 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112099005327
  3. Eaton J.K. 1995. Effects of mean flow three dimensionality on turbulent boundary-layer structure. AIAA J., 33, 2020-2025 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12942
  4. El-Samni, O.A., H.S. Yoon and H.H. Chun. 2005. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow in a vertical channel with buoyancy orthogonal to mean flow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 48, 1267-1282 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.10.014
  5. Girimaji, S.S. and S. Balachandar. 1998. Analysis and modeling of buoyancy-generated turbulence using numerical data. Int. J. Mass and Heat Transfer, 4, 915-929
  6. Iida, O. and N. Kasagi. 1997. Direct numerical simulation of unstably stratified turbulent channel flow. ASME Trans. Heat Transfer, 119, 53-61 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2824100
  7. Iida, O., N. Kasagi and Y. Nagano. 2002. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow under stably density stratification. Int. J. Mass and Heat Transfer, 45, 1693-1703 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00271-X
  8. Jeong, j., F. Hussain, W. Schoppa and J. Kim. 1997. Coherent structures near the wall in a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech., 332, 185-214
  9. Kasagi, N. and M. Nishimura. 1997. Direct numerical simulation of combined forced and natural turbulent convection in a vertical plane channel. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow, 18, 88-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-727X(96)00148-8
  10. Kim, J., Moin, P. and Moser, R. 1987. Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech., 177, 133-166 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112087000892
  11. Sommer, T.P. and R.M.C. So. 1996. Wall-bounded buoyant turbulent flow and its modeling. Int. J. Mass and Heat Transfer, 39, 3595-3606 https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(96)00048-8