Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제30권6호
  • /
  • Pages.461-469
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

단근 소구치의 근관계에 관한 방사선 사진과 투명표본 간의 일치도

COINCIDENCE BETWEEN RADIOGRAPHS AND CLEARING SAMPLES ON THE ROOT CANAL SYSTEMS OF SINGLE HOOTED PREMOLARS

  • 황호길 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 강호민 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 서강 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Hwang, Ho-Keel (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kang, Ho-Min (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Seo, Kang (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 발행 : 2005.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

한 개의 치근을 가진 상, 하악 소구치의 방사선 사진 상의 근관계와 동일치아의 투명표본 상의 근관계를 각각 관찰한 다음 상호 비교하기 위해 총 142개의 소구치를 선택한 후, 구내 치과용 표준 방사선 필름을 이용하여 근원심과 협설측으로 방사선을 채득하였다. 동일하게 교육받은 4명의 판독자가 방사전 사진을 판독하여 근관계의 형태를 분류하였다. 동일한 치아에 근판와동을 형성한 후 $5\%$ 질산용액에 48시간 동안 담가 치수조직을 용해시키고 인디안 잉크를 치수강 내로 주입하여 치수조직을 염색하였다. $5\%$ 질산용액에 48시간 동안 담가 탈회시킨 후 메틸 살리실레이트로 투명화시키고 입체현미경하에서 20배의 크기로 근관계의 형태를 평가하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 방사선과 입체현미경 소견간에는 판독자 간에 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 나타냈다 (p<0.05). 따라서 동일한 방사선 사진을 판독할 경우 판독자 간에 근관의 형태에 있어서 차이가 있을 수 있다. 그러므로 임상가는 방사전 사진을 주의깊은 판독과 예견된 근관의 형태에 따라 난이도를 고려하여 근관치료를 시행해야 할 것으로 사료된다.

The aim of this study was to compare the root canal systems of maxillary and mandibular premolars that had a single root using radiographs and clearing samples. 142 single rooted premolars were selected and mesio-distal and bucco-lingual views were radiographed using intra-oral dental standard films. Four equally trained examiners classify the root canal types from the developed radiographs. After opening the tooth for access, it was stored in $5\%$ NaOCl to dissolve the pulp tissue. Indian ink was then injected into the pulp cavity to stain the pulp tissue. It was cleared in methyl salicylate after being decalcified with $5\%$ nitric acid for 48 hours, and the root canal type was evaluated at a magnification of $\times$ 20 using a stereomicroscope. The results are as follows ; There were statistically significant differences between the radiographs and clearing samples of the root canal types among examiners (p < 0.05). There might be differences in the root canal types among examiners when the same radiograph is used. Therefore, considering the difficulty in estimating the root canal types, clinicians need to be careful when interpreting radiographs before root canal therapy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Weine FS. Endodontic Therapy. 3rd ed, Mosby: 210-211, 1982
  2. Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics. 5th ed, BC Decker Inc: 405-408, 2002
  3. Lim SS. Clinical Endodontics. 2nd ed, Dental & Medical Publishing Co.: 42-76, 1999
  4. Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed, St. Louis: CV Mosby, 2002, 194-209
  5. Hession RW. Endodontic morphology, II. A radiographic analysis. Oral Surg 44:610-620, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(77)90306-1
  6. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg 33:101-110, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(72)90214-9
  7. Pineda F. Roentgenographic investigations of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar. Oral Surg 36:253-260, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(73)90247-8
  8. Slowey RR. Radigoraphic aids in the detection of extra root canals. Oral Surg 37:762-772, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90142-X
  9. Green D. Double canals in single roots. Oral Surg 35:689-696, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(73)90037-6
  10. Hsu YY, Kim S. The receted root surface: The issue of canal isthmus. Dent Clin North Am 41:529-540, 1997
  11. Weller RN, Niemczyk SP, Kim S. Incidence and position of the canal isthmus. Part 1. Mesiobuccal oot of the maxillary first molar. J Endod 21:380-383, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80975-1
  12. Kartal N, Ozcelik B, Cimilli H. Root canal morphology of maxillary premolars. J Endodon 24:417-419, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80024-1
  13. Robertson D, Leeb IJ, McKee M, Brewer E. A clearing technique for the study of root canal systems. J Endod 6:421-424, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(80)80218-4
  14. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg 58:589-599, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9
  15. Vertucci FJ, Seelig A, Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg 58:456, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90374-0
  16. Gilles J, Reader A. An SEM investigation of the mesiolingual canal in human maxillary first and second molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 70:638-643, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(90)90415-O
  17. Baumann MA, Doll GM. Spatial reproduction of the root canal system by magnetic resonance microscopy. J Endod 23:49-51, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80207-5
  18. Goldman M, Pearson AH, Darzenta ND. Endodontic success-Who's reading the radiograph? Oral Surg 33:432-437, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(72)90473-2
  19. Gelfand M, Sunderman EJ, Goldman M. Reliability of radiographical interpretations. J Endod 9:71-75, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80079-X
  20. Zakariasen KL, Scott DA, Jensen JR. Endodontic recall radiographs: How reliable is our interpretation of endodontic success or failure and what factors affect our reliability? Oral Surg 57:343-347, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(84)90192-0
  21. Senia ES, Marshall FJ, Rosen S. The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on pulp tissue of extracted teeth. Oral Surg 31:96-103, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90040-5
  22. Pollard BK, Weller RN, Kulid JC. Standardized technique for linear dye leakage studies: Immediate versus delayed immersion times. Int Endod J 23:250-253, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1990.tb00857.x
  23. Tamse, Katz, Kablan. Comparison of apical leakage shown by four different dyes with two evaluating methods. Int Endod J 31:333-337, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00154.x
  24. Friedman S, Lustman J, Shaharabany V. Treatment results of apical surgery in premolar and molar teeth. J Endod 17:30-33, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80158-0
  25. Omer OE, Al Shalabi RM, Jennings M, Glennon J, Claffey NM. A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root-canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Int Endod J 37:291-296, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00731.x