DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of cavity shape, bond quality and volume on dentin bond strength

와동의 형태, 접착층의 성숙도, 및 와동의 부피가 상아질 접착력에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Hyo-Jin (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Soon (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Dental Research Institute School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Shin-Jae (Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Dept. of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Bum-Soon (Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Dept. of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Ho (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Dental Research Institute School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Byeong-Hoon (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Dental Research Institute School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 이효진 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김종순 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실, 서울대학교 치과대학 치학연구소) ;
  • 이신재 (서울대학교 치학연구소, 서울대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 임범순 (서울대학교 치과대학 치학연구소, 서울대학교 치과대학 치과생체재료학교실) ;
  • 백승호 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실, 서울대학교 치과대학 치학연구소) ;
  • 조병훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실, 서울대학교 치과대학 치학연구소)
  • Published : 2005.11.01

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cavity shape, bond quality of bonding agent and volume of resin composite on shrinkage stress developed at the cavity floor. This was done by measuring the shear bond strength with respect to iris materials (cavity shape , adhesive-coated dentin as a high C-factor and Teflon-coated metal as a low C-factor), bonding agents (bond quality: $Scotchbond^{TM}$ Multi-purpose and Xeno III) and iris hole diameters (volume; 1mm or 3mm in $diameter{\times}1.5mm$ in thickness). Ninety-six molars were randomly divided into 8 groups ($2{\times}2{\times}2$ experimental setup). In order to simulate a Class I cavity, shear bond strength was measured on the flat occlusal dentin surface with irises. The iris hole was filled with Z250 restorative resin composite in a bulk-filling manner. The data was analyzed using three-way ANOVA and the Tukey test. Fracture mode analysis was also done When the cavity had high C-factor, good bond quality and large volume, the bond strength decreased significantly The volume of resin composite restricted within the well-bonded cavity walls is also be suggested to be included in the concept of C-factor, as well as the cavity shape and bond quality. Since the bond quality and volume can exaggerate the effect of cavity shape on the shrinkage stress developed at the resin-dentin bond, resin composites must be filled in a method, which minimizes the volume that can increase the C-factor.

본 연구에서는 복합레진의 중합수축시 와동의 형태, 접착층의 성숙도, 및 와동의 부피가 와동저의 접착면에 발생되는 중합수축응력에 미치는 영향을 평가하였다. 1급 와동 충전시의 응력발생을 모방하기 위해, 98개의 대구치를 $2\times2\times2$ 실험군에 무작위로 분배하고 교합면 상아질을 평탄하게 연마한 후, 복합레진 충전을 위한 몰드의 역할을 할 수 있는 구멍을 가진 iris를 올려놓고 복합레진을 bulk-filling법으로 충전하였다. 각각의 변수로서 와동 형태에 관하여는 iris 재질 (접착제를 도포한 상아질 iris: 높은 C-factor, Teflon 처리된 금속 iris: 낮은 C-factor), 접착층의 성숙도에 관하여는 2종의 접착제 (Scotchbond Multi-purpose와 Xeno III), 와동의 부피에 관하여는 iris내 구멍의 직경 (직경 1 또는 $3mm{\times}높이$) 5mm)을 달리하여 전단접착강도를 측정하였다 와동의 C-factor가 클수록, 접착층의 성숙도가 우수할수록 그리고 부피가 클수록 접착력은 유의하게 감소하였다. 복합레진이 중합될 때, 와동의 형태적 제한에 따라 레진-상아질 접착계면에 발생되는 중합수축응력은 접착이 우수할수록 복합레진의 부피가 클수록 증가되므로, C-factor를 정의할 때 와동의 형태뿐 아니라, 접착층의 성숙도와 복합레진의 부피도 함께 고려되어야 된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Feilzer AJ, de GEE AF, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-1639, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
  2. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63:1396-1399, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101
  3. Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. The influence of water storage and C-factor on the dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin. Dent Mater 17:268-276, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00081-6
  4. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann KH, Chen H, Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Cox CF, Hickel R, Tagami J. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 18:269-275, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00048-3
  5. Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A. Dasch W, Frankenberger R. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 20:579-585, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.001
  6. Uno S, Shimokobe H. Contraction stress and marginal adaptation of composite restorations in dentinal cavity. Dent Mater J 13:19-24, 1994 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.13.19
  7. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 77:1435-1445, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770060801
  8. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Direction of shrinkage of light-curing resin composites. Acta Odontol Scnad 57:310-315, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428535
  9. Cho BH, Dickens SH, Bae JH, Chang CG, Son HH, Urn CM. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 27:297-304, 2002
  10. Dickens SH, Cho BH. Interpretation of bond failure through conversion and residual solvent measurements and Weibull analyses of flexural and microtensile bond strengths of bonding agents. Dent Mater 21(4):354-364, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.007
  11. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 32:109-115, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.008
  12. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, van Meerbeeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3:237-245, 2001
  13. Dickens SH, Milos MF. Relationship of dentin shear bond strengths to different laboratory test designs. Am J Dent 15:185-192, 2002
  14. Oilo G, Austrheim E. In vitro quality testing of dentin adhesives. Acta Odontol Scand 51:263-269, 1993 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040576
  15. Della Bona A, van Noort R, Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 74:1591-1596, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740091401
  16. DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 11:126-131, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80047-6
  17. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 76:1298-1307, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760061001
  18. Van Noort R, Cardew G, Howard IC, Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 70:889-893, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700050501
  19. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Harada N, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Shear and tensile bond testing for resin cement evaluation. Dent Mater 11:298-304, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80024-7
  20. Watanabe LG, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. Dentin sher strength: Effects of tubule orientation and intra tooth location. Dent Mater 12:109-115, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80077-7
  21. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different C-factor cavities. J Adhesive Dent 3:177-183, 2001
  22. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236-40, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  23. Cho BH, Dickens SH. Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater 20:107-115, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00071-X