Determination of Optimum EC of Nutrient Solution by Season in Closed System of Rosa hybrida by Total Integrated Solar Radiation

장미 일사비례제어에 의한 순환식 양액재배시 계절별 급액 EC농도 구명

  • Na, Taek-Sang (Horticultural Research Division, Jeollanamdo Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Choi, Kyong-Ju (Horticultural Research Division, Jeollanamdo Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Cho, Myoung-Soo (Horticultural Research Division, Jeollanamdo Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Gi, Gwang-Yeon (Horticultural Research Division, Jeollanamdo Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Yoo, Yong-Kweon (Division of Biotechnology and Resources, Mokpo Nat'l Univ.,)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the optimum EC supply by accumulation amount of solar radiation in closed system. EC concentration of drainage was higher than that of supply. The higher EC concentration of supply was, the lower pH of drainage was. It was no difference in the quality of cut rose 'Nobles' (Rosa hybrida), stem length, stem diameter, leaf number, petal length, and petal diameter by EC treatment by season. The yield was higher about $6\%$ in treatment of EC $1.3dS{\cdot}m^{-1}$ in April and May, about $10\%$ in treatment of EC $10dS{\cdot}m^{-1}$ in June, July and August, and about $10\%$ in treatment of EC 1.0 or $1.3dS{\cdot}m^{-1}$ in September and October than the others. In general, the yield of the cut rose was higher in treatment of (B) EC 1.3 mS/cm in spring, EC $1.0dS{\cdot}m^{-1}$ in summer, EC $1.3dS{\cdot}m^{-1}$ in autumn, and EC$1.6dS{\cdot}m^{-1}$ in winter.

계절별로 EC를 달리하여 처리한 결과, EC농도는 급액보다 배액이 높았고 EC를 높게 급액하면 급배액간의 농도차가 많았으며 pH는 급액 EC가 높을수록 배액의 pH가 낮았다. 장미품질은 절화장, 경경, 엽수, 화고, 화폭과 같은 장미의 품질에는 차이가 없었다. 수량은 4월과 5월에 EC 1.3으로 공급한 처리에서 $6\%$ 정도 많았고, 6, 7, 8월에는 EC 1.0으로 공급한 처리에서 $10\%$정도 많았다. 또한 9월과 10월에는 EC 1.0과 1.3으로 공급한 처리에서 수량이 $10\%$정도 많았다. 전체적으로는 EC를 봄에는 1.3,여름에는 1.0, 가을에 1.3, 그리고 겨울에 1.64로 조절한 (B)처리가 수량이 가장 많았다.

Keywords

References

  1. 荒木浩一. 1986. ロックウル栽培の基礎と實際. 農業およぴ園藝. 61(9):1093-1097
  2. Bartosik, M.L., K. Salonen, R. Jokinen, and K.R. Huk­knen. 1993. Comparison of open and closed growing methods on peat and rock-wool and the leaching of nutrients. Acta Hort 342:303-305
  3. Benoit F. 1992. Practical guide for simple soilless cul­ture techniques. European vegetable R & D Center p. 28-37. Belgium
  4. Boertje, G.A. 1986. The effect of the untrient concen­tration in the propagation of tomatoes and cucumber on rockwool. Acta Hort. 178:59-65
  5. Bohme, M. 1995. Effects of closed systems in sub­strate culture for vegetable production in greenhouses. Acta Hort. 396:45-54
  6. Jensen, M.H. 1997. Hydroponics. HortScience 32: 1018-1021
  7. Kang, Y.H., Y.M. Kwon, H.J. Kim, U.S. Shim, J.B. Lee, Y.N. Hong. 2000. Plant physiology. academy­books. p. 123. Seoul
  8. Krussmann, G. 1982. Roses. BT Batsford LTD. Lon­don. p. 6
  9. Kueak, P.J. 1982. Agriculture & forest fertilizer. Hak­moonsa. p. 86. Seoul
  10. Lim, S.O. 1982. Plant science of nutrient-fertilizer. Ilshinsa. p. 12. Seoul
  11. MAE 2005. Floriculture growth situation
  12. Schwarz, M. 1995. Soilless culturs management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. p. 31 -32, 43-56
  13. Youn, P.S. 1989. Horticulture & plant pictorial book. pp. 890-901. Jishinsanueb, Seoul
  14. Zekki, H., L. Gauthier, and A. Gosselin. 1996. Growth, productivity and mineral composition of hydroponically cultivated greenhouse tomatoes with or without nutrient solution recycling. J. Amer. Soc Hort. Sci. 121:1082-1088