An Accurate Radio Channel Model for Wireless Sensor Networks Simulation

  • Alejandro Martfnez-Sala (Department of Information Technologies and Communications at the Polytechnic University of Cartagena(UPCT)) ;
  • Jose-Maria Molina-Garcia-Pardo (Department of Information Technologies and Communications at the Polytechnic University of Cartagena(UPCT)) ;
  • Esteban Egea-Lopez (Department of Information Technologies and Communications at the Polytechnic University of Cartagena(UPCT)) ;
  • Javier Vales-Alonso (Department of Information Technologies and Communications at the Polytechnic University of Cartagena(UPCT)) ;
  • Leandro Juan-Llacer (Department of Information Technologies and Communications at the Polytechnic University of Cartagena(UPCT)) ;
  • Joan Garcia-Haro (Department of Information Technologies and Communications at the Polytechnic University of Cartagena(UPCT))
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

Simulations are currently an essential tool to develop and test wireless sensor networks (WSNs) protocols and to analyze future WSNs applications performance. Researchers often simulate their proposals rather than deploying high-cost test-beds or develop complex mathematical analysis. However, simulation results rely on physical layer assumptions, which are not usually accurate enough to capture the real behavior of a WSN. Such an issue can lead to mistaken or questionable results. Besides, most of the envisioned applications for WSNs consider the nodes to be at the ground level. However, there is a lack of radio propagation characterization and validation by measurements with nodes at ground level for actual sensor hardware. In this paper, we propose to use a low-computational cost, two slope, log-normal path­loss near ground outdoor channel model at 868 MHz in WSN simulations. The model is validated by extensive real hardware measurements obtained in different scenarios. In addition, accurate model parameters are provided. This model is compared with the well-known one slope path-loss model. We demonstrate that the two slope log-normal model provides more accurate WSN simulations at almost the same computational cost as the single slope one. It is also shown that the radio propagation characterization heavily depends on the adjusted model parameters for a target deployment scenario: The model parameters have a considerable impact on the average number of neighbors and on the network connectivity.

Keywords

References

  1. R. Szewczyk, A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, J. Anderson, and D. Culler, 'An analysis of a large scale habitat monitoring application,' in Proc. ACM SenSys 2004, Baltimore (USA), Nov. 2004
  2. D. Ganesan, D. Estrin, A. Woo, and D. Culler, 'Complex behavior at scale: An experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks,' Technical Report UCLA/CSD-TR02-0013, Center for Embedded Networked Sensing, University of California, Berkeley, Feb. 2002
  3. E. Egea-Lopez, J. Vales-Alonso, A. S. Martinez-Sala, P. Pavon-Marino, and J. Garcia-Haro, 'Simulation tools for wireless sensor networks,' in Proc. SPECTS 2005, Philadelphia, PA, July 2005, pp. 559-566
  4. D. Kotz, C. Newport, B. Gray, J. Liu, Y. Yuan, and C. Elliot, 'Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions,' in Proc. ACM/IEEE MSWiM 2004, Venice, Italy, Oct. 2004, pp. 78-82
  5. M. Takai, R. Bagrodia, K. Tang, and M. Gerla, 'Efficient wireless network simulations with detailed propagation models,' Wireless Networks, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 297-305, May 2001 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016682323833
  6. V. Naoumov and T. Gross, 'Simulation oflarge ad-hoc networks,' in Proc. ACM MSWiM 2003, San Diego, CA, 2003, pp. 50-57
  7. The network simulator ns-2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
  8. L. F. Perrone, Y. Yuan, and M. Nicol, 'Modeling and simulation best practices for wireless ad hoc networks,' in Proc. 2003 Winter Simulation Conf., New Orleans, LA, 2003, pp. 685-693
  9. K. Sohrabi, B. Manriquez, and G. Pottie, 'Near-ground wideband channel measurements,' in Proc. IEEE VTC'99, New York, 1999, pp. 571-574
  10. T. Rappaport, Principles of Communications Systems, Prentice Hall, 2nd ed
  11. J. Zhao and R. Govindan, 'Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks,' in Proc. ACM SenSys 2003, Los Angeles, California (USA), Nov. 2003
  12. A. Woo, T. Tong, and D. Culler, 'Taming the underlying issues for reliable multihop routing in sensor networks,' in Proc. ACM SenSys 2003, Los Angeles, California (USA), Nov. 2003
  13. N. Reijers, G. P. Halkes, and K. G. Langendoen, 'Link layer in sensor networks,' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems 2004, Florida (USA), Oct. 2004
  14. G. Zhou, T. He, S. Krishnamurthy, and J. A. Stankovic, 'Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks,' in Proc. MobySys 2004, Boston, MA, June 2004, pp. 125-138
  15. Chipcon CC1000, http://www.chipcon.com
  16. Mica2 MOTES, http://www.xbow.com
  17. H. L. Bertoni, Radio Propagation for Modern Wireless Systems, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 2000
  18. H. Spath, One Dimensional Spline Interpolation Algorithms, Wellesley, A. K. Peters Ltd., 1995