Temperature and diameter effect on hydrodynamic characteristic of surfactant drag-reducing flows

  • Indartono Y.S. (Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University) ;
  • Usui H. (Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Kobe University) ;
  • Suzuki H. (Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University) ;
  • Komoda Y. (Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Kobe University)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

Hydrodynamic characteristic of surfactant drag-reducing flows is still not fully understood. This work investigated the temperature and diameter effect on hydrodynamic characteristic of cationic surfactant drag reducing flows in pipes. Solution of oleyl bishydroxyethyl methyl ammonium chloride (Ethoquad O/12), 900 ppm, as a cationic surfactant and sodium salicylate (NaSal), 540 ppm, as a counter-ion was tested at 12, 25, 40, and $50^{\circ}C$ in pipes with diameter of 13, 25, and 40 mm. Drag reduction effectiveness of this surfactant solution was evaluated in 25 mm pipe from 6 to $75^{\circ}C$. Rheological characteristic of this solution was measured by stress control type rheometer with cone-and-plate geometry. Scale-up laws proposed by previous investigators were used to evaluate the flow characteristic of the solution. It was found that this surfactant solution has clear DR capability until $70^{\circ}C$. Result of this work suggested that temperature has a significant influence in changing the hydrodynamic entrance length of surfactant drag reducing flows. From rheological measurement, it was found that the solution exhibits Shear Induced Structure at all temperatures with different degree of peak viscosity and critical shear rate.

Keywords

References

  1. Aguilar, G., K. Galsjevic and E.F. Matthys, 2001, Asymptotes of maximum friction and heat transfer reductions for drag-reducing surfactant solutions, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 44, 2835-2843 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(00)00319-7
  2. Bewersdorff, H-W., 1996, Rheology of Drag Reducing Surfactant Solutions, FED-Vol. 237, 1996 Fluids Engineering Division Conference, 2, ASME, 25-29
  3. Bewersdorff, H-W., 1990, Drag Reduction in Surfactant Solution, In: A. Gyr, (ed.), Structure of Turbulence and Drag Reduction, IUTAM Symposium Zurich/Switzerland 1989, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 293-312
  4. Bewersdorff, H.-W. and D. Ohlendorf, 1988, The behaviour of drag-reducing cationic surfactant solutions, Colloid & Polymer Science 266, 941-953 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410851
  5. Cho, Y.I., J.P. Hartnett, Nonnewtonian Fluids, In: W.M. Rohsenow, J.P. Hartnett and E.N. Ganic (eds.), 1985, Handbook of Heat Transfer Applications, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Inc., USA, 2-2-2-50
  6. Chou, LC., RN. Christensen and JL. Zakin, 1989, The influence of chemical composition of quaternary ammonium salt cationic surfactants on their drag reducing effectiveness, in RHJ. Sellin and R.T. Mores (eds), Drag reduction in fluid flow, techniques for friction control, Ellis Horwood Pub., 141-148
  7. Gasljevic, K., G. Aguilar and E.F. Matthys, 2001, On two distinct types of drag-reducing fluids, diameter scaling, and turbulent profiles, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 96, 405-425 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(00)00169-5
  8. Gasljevic, K., G. Aguilar and E.F. Matthys, 1999, An improved diameter scaling correlation for turbulent flow of drag-reducing polymer solutions, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 84, 131- 148 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(98)00155-4
  9. Gasljevic, K. and E.F. Matthys, 1997, Experimental Investigation of Thermal and Hydrodynamic Development Regions for Drag-Reducing Surfactant Solutions, Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Heat Transfer 119, 80-88 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2824103
  10. Gasljevic, K. and E.F. Matthys, 1995, On The Diameter Effect for Turbulent Flow of Drag-Reducing Surfactant Solutions, To appear in the proceeding of 'Development and Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows III', IMECE, San Fransisco, ASME Pub
  11. Gyr, A. and H.-W. Bewersdoff, 1995, Drag reduction of turbulent flows by additives, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston
  12. Lu, B., Y. Zheng, HT. Davis, LE. Scriven, Y. Talmon and JL. Zakin, 1988, Effect of variations in counterion to surfactant ratio on rheology and microstructures of drag reducing cationic surfactant systems, Rheol. Acta 37, 528-548 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003970050140
  13. Lu, B., X. Li, J.L. Zakin and T. Talmon, 1997, A non-viscoelastic drag reducing cationic surfactant system, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 71, 59-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(96)01541-8
  14. Li, F.-C., Y. Kawaguchi and K. Hishida, 2004, Investigation on the characteristics of turbulence transport for momentum and heat in a drag-reducing surfactant solution flow, Physics of Fluids 16(9), 3281-3295 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1769375
  15. Lin, Z., B. Lu, J.L. Zakin, Y. Talmon, Y. Zheng, H.T. Davis and L.E. Scriven, 2001, Influence of Surfactant Concentration and Counterion to Surfactant Ratio on Rheology of Wormlike Micelles, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 239, 543- 554 https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.7618
  16. McComb, WD., 1990, The Physics of Fluid Turbulence, Oxford University Press Inc., New York, USA
  17. Myska, J. and P. Stern, 1998, Significance of shear induced structure in surfactant drag reduction, Colloid Polym. Sci. 276, 816- 823 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003960050315
  18. Pollert, J., P. Komrzy, K. vejkovsky and J.P. Jun, 1996, Drag Reduction and Heat Transfer of Cationic Surfactant Solutions, FED-Vol.237, 1996 Fluids Engineering Division Conference, Volume 2, ASME, 31-36
  19. Suzuki, H., GG. Fuller, T. Nakayama and H. Usui, 2004, Development characteristics of drag-reducing surfactant solution flow in a duct, Rheol. Acta 43, 232-239 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-003-0335-6
  20. Tagoku, H., S. Sumio and S. Goto, 2004, Flow Properties of Surfactant Aquwous Solutions in Pipe Junction, Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi, 32(1), 41-48 https://doi.org/10.1678/rheology.32.41
  21. Usui, H., T. Itoh and T. Saeki, 1998, On pipe diameter effects in surfactant drag-reducing pipe flows, Rheol. Acta 37, 122-128, Steinkopff Verlag https://doi.org/10.1007/s003970050098
  22. Zakin, J.L., J. Myska, Z. Chara, 1996, New Limiting Drag Reduction and Velocity Profile Asymptotes for Nonpolymeric Additives Systems, AIChe Journal 42(12), 3544-3546 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690421223
  23. Zhang, Y., J. Schmidt, Y. Talmon and J.L. Zakin, 2005, Co-solvent effects on drag reduction, rheological properties and micelle microstructures of cationic surfactants, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 286, 696-709 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.055
  24. Wilson, K.C., Additives: Theoretical models, In: R.H.J. Sellin and R.T. Moses (eds.), 1989, Drag reduction in fluid flows: Techniques for Friction Control, Ellis Horwood Publishers, England