Validation of Salinity Data from ARGO Floats: Comparison between the Older ARGO Floats and that of Later Deployments

  • Youn Yong-Hoon (Marine Meteorology & Earthquake Research Lab., Meteorological Research Institute) ;
  • Lee Homan (Marine Meteorology & Earthquake Research Lab., Meteorological Research Institute) ;
  • Chang You-Soon (Marine Meteorology & Earthquake Research Lab., Meteorological Research Institute) ;
  • Thadathil Pankajakshan (National Institute of Oceanography)
  • Published : 2005.03.01

Abstract

Continued observation of ARGO floats for years(about 4 years) makes the conductivity sensor more vulnerable to fouling by marine life and associated drift in salinity measurements. In this paper, we address this issue by making use of floats deployed in different years. Floats deployed in the East Sea and the Indian Ocean are examined to find out float-to-float match-ups in such a way that an older float pops up simultaneously with a newer deployment (with tolerable space-time difference). A time difference of less than five days and space difference of less than 100km are considered for the match-up data sets. For analysis of the salinity drift under the stable water mass, observations of the floats from deepest water masses have been used. From the cross-check of ARGO floats in the East Sea and the Indian Ocean, it is found that there is a systematic drift in the older float compared to later deployments. All drift results, consistently show negative bias indicating the typical nature of drift from fouled sensors. However, the drift is much less than 0.01, the specified accuracy of ARGO program.

Keywords

References

  1. Argo Science Team, 2000, Report of the Argo Science Team Meeting (Argo-2), March 2000. 7-9, Southampton Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UKTidewater Inn, Easton Maryland, 38 p
  2. Bacon, S., L. Centurioni, and W. Gould, 2001, The evaluation of salinity measurements from PALACE floats. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 18, 1258-1266 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1258:TEOSMF>2.0.CO;2
  3. Kim, Y. G and K. Kim, 1999, Intermediate waters in the East/Japan Sea, Journal of Oceanography, 55, 123-132 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007877610531
  4. Oka, E., and K. Ando, 2004, Stability of temperature and conductivity sensors of Argo profiling floats, Journal of Oceanography. 60 (2), 253-258 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCE.0000038331.10108.79
  5. Riser, S. and D. Swift, 2003, Long-term measurements of salinity from profiling floats, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, submitted
  6. Wong, A. P. S., G. C. Johnson, and W. B. Owens, 2003, Delayed-mode calibration of autonomous CTD profiling float salinity data by theta-S climatology. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 20, 308-318 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<0308:DMCOAC>2.0.CO;2