Spatial changes of the upper dentition following en-masse space closure: A comparison between first and second premolar extraction

En-masse 견인에 의한 발치공간 폐쇄 후 상악치열의 이동양상 -제1소구치 및 제2소구치 발치 비교

  • Kim, Hui-Jung (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Chun, Youn-Sic (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Jung, Sang-Hyuk (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
  • 김희정 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 교정과) ;
  • 전윤식 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 교정과) ;
  • 정상혁 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Published : 2005.10.01

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental study was to evaluate aㅜd compare maxillary arch dimensional and positional changes between first and second premolar extraction groups. The Calorific Machine was used to illustrate tooth movement in three dimensions. The experimental teeth except the first or second premolars were embedded in artifical alveolar bone. The extraction space was closed using arch wires with bull loops into which 15 degree gable bends were placed. Before and after space closure, radiographs were taken in the sagittal and occlusal directions using occlusal films. The results showed greater mean maxillary incisor retraction and less anchorage loss in the maxillary first premolar extraction group than in the maxillary second premolar extraction group. Mesiopalatal rotation of anchor teeth was greater after extraction of a maxillary second premolar than a maxillary first premolar (P<.001).

제1소구치 또는 제2소구치 발치 후 발치공간 폐쇄 시 치아이동의 양상 즉, 치아이동방향과 이동량을 구명하는 것이 본 연구의 목적이었다. 상악 우측 인공 치조골부에 제1소구치 또는 제2소구치를 제외한 중절치부터 제2대구치 까지 실험용 치아들을 식립하고 bull loop이 형성된 반쪽 호선에 15도의 gable bend를 부여한 후 전치부를 후방견인하여 발츠공간을 폐쇄시켰다. 실험 전후에 교합면 방사선사진과 시상면 방사선사진을 촬영하고 인공치조골부 하단에 식립된 기준표지점에 중첩하여 이동방향 및 이동량을 계측하였다. 그 결과 제2소구치 발치군의 전치부후방이동량이 제1소구치 발치군에 비해 더 적었으며 구치부의 고정원 소실 및 고정원의 근심설측회전량은 제2소구치 발치군에서 더 크게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Sadowsky C, Sakols EI. Long-term assessment of orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod 1982;82:456-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90312-8
  2. Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-First premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981;80:349-65 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(81)90171-8
  3. Kahl-Nieke B, Fischbach H, Schwarze CW. Treatment and postrotention changes in dental arch width dimensions-a long term evaluation of influencing cofactors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109: 368-78 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70118-X
  4. Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogel DS. 1986 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part I - overall results. J Clin Orthod 1986;20:612-25
  5. Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogel DS. 1996 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part I - results and trends. J Clin Orthod 1996;30:615-29
  6. Proffit WR. Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 1994;64:407-14
  7. Crossman IG, Reed RT. Long term results of premolar extractions in orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1978;5:61-6 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.5.2.61
  8. Ong HB, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects. Angle Orthod 2001;71:90-102
  9. Shearn BN, Woods MG, An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of mandibular first and second premolar extraction effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117:351-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70240-X
  10. Lee RT. Arch width and form: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:305-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70334-3
  11. Schoppe RJ. An analysis of second premolar extraction procedures. Angle Orthod 1964;34:292-302
  12. Williams R, Hosila FJ. The effect of different extraction sites upon incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 1976;69:388-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90208-6
  13. Saelens NA, De Srnit AA. Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:225-36 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/20.3.225
  14. Rhee JN, Chun YS, Row J. A comparison between friction and frictionless mechanics with a new typodont simulation system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:292-9 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.112452
  15. 양성재, 정성권, 노준, 전윤식. Precision- TPA를 이용한 구치부 회전시 근심 및 원심 삽입법에 따른 동적인 치아이동 양상에 관한 실험 연구. 대치교정지 1999:29:442-33
  16. Brandt S, Safirstein GR. Different extractions for different malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1975;68: 15-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(75)90157-8
  17. Steyn CL, du Preez RJ, Harris AM. Differential premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997:112:480-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70074-X
  18. Proffit WR, Fields HWJ. Contemporary Orthodontics, 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 308-11
  19. 전윤식, 노준, 정상혁, 김희정. 상악전치 후방 견인시 견인 loop 후방에 부여한 gable bend 양에 따른 치아이동 양상에 관한 연구. 대치교정지 2004;34:33-45
  20. Creekmore TD. Where teeth should be positioned in the face and jaws and how to get them there. J Clin Orthod 1997;31 :586-608
  21. Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE. The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in 'clear-cut' extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod 1993;63:257-72
  22. De La Cruz A. Sampson P, Little RM, Artun J, Shapiro PA. Longterm changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:518-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70119-2
  23. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning- Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993:103:395-411 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81791-3