LAG TIME RELATIONS TO CATCHMENT SHAPE DESCRIPTORS AND HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE

  • Kim, Joo-Cheol (Hydrologic System Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Han (Department of Civil Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • 발행 : 2005.04.01

초록

One of the most important factors for estimating a flood runoff from streams is the lag time. It is well known that the lag time is affected by the morphometric properties of basin which can be expressed by catchment shape descriptors. In this paper, the notion of the geometric characteristics of an equivalent ellipse proposed by Moussa(2003) was applied for calculating the lag time of geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph(GIUH) at a basin outlet. The lag time was obtained from the observed data of rainfall and runoff by using the method of moments and the procedure based on geomorphology was used for GIUH. The relationships between the basin morphometric properties and the hydrological response were discussed based on application to 3 catchments in Korea. Additionally, the shapes of equivalent ellipse were examined how they are transformed from upstream area to downstream one. As a result, the relationship between the lag time and descriptors was shown to be close, and the shape of ellipse was presented to approach a circle along the river downwards. These results may be expanded to the estimation of hydrological response of ungauged catchment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chutha, P., and Dooge, J. C. I., 1990. The shape parameters of the geomorphologic unit hydrograph. Journal of Hydrology, 117, pp. 81-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90087-E
  2. Gupta, V.K., Waymire, E., and Wang, C.T., 1980. A representation of an instantaneous unit hydrograph from geomorphology. Water Resources Research. 16(5), pp. 855-862
  3. Gupta, V.K., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Wood, E.F., 1986. Scale problems in hydrology. D. Reidel Publishing company
  4. Horton, R.E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America. 56, pp. 275-370 https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2
  5. Jin, C. X. (1992). 'A deterministic gamma type geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph based on path types', Water Resources Research, 28(2), 479-486 https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02577
  6. Klemes, V., 1983. Conceptualization and scale in hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 65, pp. 1-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(83)90208-1
  7. Moussa, R. (2003). 'On morphometric properties of basins, scale effects and hydrological response', Hydrological Processes, 17, 33-58 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1114
  8. Nash, J.E., 1957. The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. IASH Assemblee Generale de Toronto. (3), pp. 114-121
  9. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Valdes, J.B., 1979. The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response. Water Resources Research. 15(6), pp. 1409-1420
  10. Rosso, R., 1984. Nash model relation of Horton order ratio. Water Resources Research. 20(7), pp.914-920
  11. Shumm, S.A., 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America. 67, pp. 597-646 https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2
  12. Smart, J.S., 1968. Statistical properties of stream length. Water resources Resarch. 15(6), pp. 1409-1420
  13. Stralhler, A.N., 1952. Hypsometric(area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America. 63, pp. 1117-1142 https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[1117:HAAOET]2.0.CO;2