DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ecotourism of Upo Wetland and Perceptions of Stakeholders

  • Roh Yong-Ho (Department of Hospitalality Management, Daekyung College) ;
  • Kim Sang-Ho (Division of Hotel and Culinary, Daekyung College)
  • Published : 2005.10.01

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to investigate ecotourism goals of conservation and increasing residents' benefits based on perceptions from the stakeholders of the Upo wetland. The stakeholders are residents, five villages' reprensentatives, people who were residents but now live out of the area, civil officals, and environmental NGO staffs of he Upo wetland. The results of this study were as follows: While the perceptions of environmental conservation among interviewees were positive, the residents' perceptions about residents' benefits were very negative in the Upo wetland. People who used to reside and then moves out had pride about the Upo and they wanted to return to live in the Upo wetland area. Even though the wetland is named as one of the most well known ecotourism sites by the Ministry of Environment and Korean National Ecotourism Organization(KNTO), the Upo wetland area is not an ecotourism site yet based on the definition of ecotourism goals which seek generating conservation and residents' benefits in this study. There are suggestions for this wetland area. The conservation policy with the residents' benefits are strongly recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. Hearne, R. R. and S. M. Zenia, 2002, The use of choice experiments in the analysis of tourist preferences for ecotourism development in Costa Rica, Journal of Environmental Management, 65, 153-163 https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0541
  2. UNDP Korea, 2005, Project Document Conservation of Globally Significant Wetlands in the Republic of Korea, Distributed at the International Wetland Day (Feb 2nd) in Changyoung, Korea
  3. Gyungnam Province, 2005, Inviting You to 2008 Ramsar Convention in Gyungnam Province, Korea, 5
  4. Weaver, 1998, Ecotourism in the Less Developed World, Wallington, U.K., Oxon International, 25
  5. Korea National Tourism Organization, 1996, The Direction of Development and Prediction of Ecotourism, 152
  6. Boo, E., 1990, Ecotourism: The Potential and Pitfalls, Washington D.C., World Wildlife Fund, 55
  7. Buckley, R., 1994, A Framework for Ecotourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 21, 629-642 https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(94)90124-4
  8. Higgins, B. R., 1996, The Global Structure of the Nature Tourism Industry; Ecotourists, tour operators and local business, J. of Travel Research, 35(2), 11-18
  9. Ross, S. and G. Wall, 1999, Ecotourism: towards Congruence between Theory and Practice, Tourism Management
  10. Butler, R., 1989, Alternative tourism : Pious Hope or Trojan Horse?, J. of Travel Research, 28(3), 40-45
  11. Kim S. S., 1998, Economic Impact of a Birding Festival, Festival Management & Event Tourism, 5, 51-58 https://doi.org/10.3727/106527098792186702
  12. Jeong, G. H. and Y. H. Roh, 2003, The Appraisal of the Muju Firefly Festival(.99-.01), J. of Tourism and Leisure Research, The Korea Academic Society of Tourism and Leisure, 14(4), 445-460
  13. Lindberg, K, J. Erena and K. C. Sproule, 1995, Ecotourism Questioned case studies from Belize, Annals of Tourism Research, 23(3), 543-562 https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00074-7
  14. Stone, M. and G. Wall, 2003, Ecotourism and Community Development: Cases Studies from Hainan, China, Environmental Management, 33(1), 12-24
  15. Park, S. Y., S. Y. Yoon, G. C. Lee and G. G. Kim, 2000, Introduction to Wetland(Korean wetland), Kyeungnam Development Institute, 287-288
  16. The Chang young County, 1997, The Direction of Ecosystem of the Upo and Mokpo
  17. Kim, S., 2000, An anlysis of Avifauna and Community Structure of Waterbirds at Woopo Wetland, Provo Kyung-nam, Master Thesis of Kyungpook National University, 1-32
  18. The Changyoung County, 2002, Living Natural Mystrious the Upo wetland, 20-32
  19. Lee, K. O., 2000, A Study on the Relationship of Ecotourist's Individual Characteristics, Tourism Activity Participation and Satisfaction, Doctoral Dissertation of Taegu University, 1-142
  20. Roh, Y. H., 2004, The Determinants of Ecotourists Satisfaction and Behavioral Responses, Doctoral Dissertation of Kyungpook National University, 1-130
  21. Kim, S., J. Cho and S. Kim, 2000, The Conservation of Woopo Swamp Ecosystem Conservation Area and Ecotourism(1), The Korean Academy of Parks & Recreation, 2(1), 13-20
  22. Roh, Y. H. and Y. Jo, 2004, Event Programs for Ecotourism: The Case Study of the Upo Wetland, J. of Korean Society of Event, 4(1), 41-60
  23. Kim, K. S., 2004, Competition with Regional Brand, The Busan Daily Newspaper October 29, 6
  24. The Changyong Country, 1998, The Short History of Dehap sub-county of Changyoung County, www.me.or.kr, 84-86