DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

동진강 유역의 오염부하량 평가

Assessment of Pollutant Loads in the Dongjin River

  • 발행 : 2005.06.30

초록

동진강 수질관리 대안을 제시하고자 점 및 비점 오염원으로부터 발생, 배출, 유달부하량을 평가하였다. 용호 덕천천 유역은 BOD의 평균농도가 4.44 mg $L^{-1}$로 동진강 유역에서 가장 높았으며, T-N의 농도는 7.44 mg $L^{-1}$를 나타냈다. 정읍천 유역은 BOD의 평균농도가 2.29 mg $L^{-1}$, T-N의 농도는 4.40 mg $L^{-1}$, T-P의 농도는 0.27 mg $L^{-1}$를 나타냈다. 칠보천 유역은 타 지역에 비하여 오염도가 가장 낮았으며, BOD의 평균 농도는 1.19 mg $L^{-1}$로 I급수 수질을 나타냈고, T-N의 농도는 3.15 mg $L^{-1}$, T-P의 농도는 0.13 mg $L^{-1}$이었다. 원평천과 신평천은 BOD의 평균 농도가 $2.59{\sim}3.56mg\;L^{-1}$를 나타냈으며, T-N의 농도는 $4.06{\sim}7.35mg\;L^{-1}$로 타 지역에 비해 다소 높았다. 동진강 각 유역별 비점오염의 T-N 배출부하량은 원평천, 고부천, 용호 덕천천, 정읍천, 신평천 유역 순으로 많았다. T-P 배출부하량은 고부천 유역이 53 kg $day^{-1}$, 용호 덕천천 유역이 58 kg $day^{-1}$, 정읍천 유역이 45 kg $day^{-1}$, 원평천 유역이 68 kg $day^{-1}$, 칠보천 유역이 30 kg $day^{-1}$, 신평천 유역이 30kg $day^{-1}$이었다. 배출부하량의 오염원별 비율은 축산에 의한 영향이 가장 컸다. 용호천 유역은 강우기와 비강우기 T-N 유달부하량 차이가 매우 컸으며, 칠보천 유역은 비강우기와 강우기에 T-N 유달부하랑이 크지 않았다. 유역별 BOD, T-N, T-P의 유달율은 동진강 모든 유역에서 100% 이하였으나 강우시 T-N 유달율은 용호천 유역이 119.4%, 칠보천 유역이 117.5%로 높았다.

This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of pollutant loads on the water quality in the Dongjin River area from January 2003 to December 2004. The average value of BOD and T-N showed the highest peak in Yongho, Dukcheon watershed among Dongjin River. Concentrations of BOD, T-N and T-P in Jeongeup watershed were 2.29 mg $L^{-1}$, 4.40 mg $L^{-1}$ and 0.27 mg $L^{-1}$, respectively. Concentration of BOD in Chilbo was 1.19 mg $L^{-1}$ which would be in the grade I according to water quality criteria by Ministry of Environment. The BOD level in Wonpeung and Sinpeung watershed ranged from 4.06 to 7.35 mg $L^{-1}$. The T-N effluent loads of non-point pollutants were high in Wonpeung, Gobu, Yongho Dukcheon, Jeongeup and Sinpeung watershed in order. The major sources of BOD, T-N and T-P effluent loads were Livestock. The T-P effluent load of non-point pollutant was 68 kg $day^{-1}$ in Wonpeung, 58 kg $day^{-1}$ in Yongho Dukcheon and 45 kg $day^{-1}$ Jeongeup watershed. The delivered loads of BOD was high in Gobucheon, while both T-N and T-P were high in Yongho Dukcheon. The delivery ratio of BOD and T-N at dry season was below 100% in all watershed of Dongjin River. The delivery ratio of T-N at raining season was high in Yongho Dukcheon and Chilbo watershed

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jain, C. K., Bhatia, K. K. S. and Seth, S.M. (1998) Assessment of point and non-point sources of pollution using a chemical mass balance approach, Hydrological Sciences, 43(3), 379-390 https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669809492133
  2. Chesters, G. and Schierow, L.J. (1985) A primer on nonpoint pollution, Journal. of Soil & water conservation 40(1):9-13
  3. Osborne, L.L. Wiley, and M.J. (1988) Empirical relationship between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed, Journal. of Environmental Management 26:9-27
  4. Budd, W.W., Cohen, P.L., Saunders, P.R. and Steiner, F.R. (1987) Stream corridor management in the Pacific northwest: determination of stream corridor width, Environmental Management 11:587-597 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01880157
  5. Charles, M.C. and William, M.L. (1992) Water quality and agriculture Mississippi experiences. J. of soil and water conservation, 47(3):220-223
  6. Ministry of Environ. (2000) The standard method of water analysis
  7. William Horwitz. 1980. Methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists. A.O.A.C: 550-552
  8. Ministry of Environ. (1999) Guideline of total pollutant to stream management
  9. Knox, E. and Moody. D.W. (1991) Influence of hydrology. soil properties, and agricultural land use on nitrogen in ground water. In managing nitrogen for ground water quality and farm profitability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.:19-57
  10. John, Cobourn and Sue. D. (1996) Water quality education for owners of small ranches. J. of soil and water conservation, 51(1):41-45

피인용 문헌

  1. Physicochemical water quality characteristics in relation to land use pattern and point sources in the basin of the Dongjin River and the ecological health assessments using a fish multi-metric model vol.40, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-016-0011-2
  2. Long-Term Ecological Health Assessment of a Restored Urban Stream Based on Chemical Water Quality, Physical Habitat Conditions and Biological Integrity vol.11, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010114