Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

INTERNAL VS. RIGID EXTERNAL DISTRACTION DEVICE FOR THE MAXILLARY HYPOPLASIA OF CLEFT PATIENTS

구순구개열 환자의 상악골 열성장에서 골신장술을 위한 Internal distraction device와 Rigid external distraction의 비교

  • Paeng, Jun-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hwang, Soon-Jung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seo, Byoung-Moo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choung, Pill-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Hak (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 팽준영 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 명훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 황순정 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 서병무 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 최진영 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이종호 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 정필훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 백승학 (서울대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 김명진 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.07.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis for the advancement of hypoplastic maxilla of cleft patients has shown successful results. In this report, rigid external distraction(RED) system and internal distraction device were used for maxillary advancement. Each system has its advantages and disadvantages. Larger amount of advancement can be achieved with RED system. But complex external device may give patients psychological stress. Internal device is invisible. However its distraction amount have limitation for the advancement (< 20mm) and the vector cannot be changed freely during distraction. The authors treated five cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia(three with RED system and two with internal distractor). Their results were clinically satisfactory. We present the pros and cons of RED and internal system for maxillary distraction osteogenesis.

Keywords

References

  1. Aduss H : Craniofacial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Angle Orthod 41(3) : 202, 1971
  2. Cohen SR, Corrigan M, Wilmot J, Trotman CA : Cumulative operative procedures in patients aged 14 years and older with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(2) : 267, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199508000-00003
  3. da Silva Filho OG, Normando AD, Capelozza Filho L : Mandibular growth in patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate--the influence of cleft type. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104(3) : 269, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81729-9
  4. DeLuke DM, Marchand A, Robles EC, Fox P : Facial growth and the need for orthognathic surgery after cleft palate repair: literature review and report of 28 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55(7) : 694, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90579-6
  5. Erbe M, Stoelinga PJ, Leenen RJ : Long-term results of segmental repositioning of the maxilla in cleft palate patients without previously grafted alveolo-palatal clefts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 24(2) : 109, 1996
  6. Felemovicius J, Ortiz Monasterio F, Gomez Radillo LS, Serna A : Determining the optimal time for consolidation after distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 11(5) : 430, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200011050-00004
  7. Figueroa AA, Polley JW : Management of severe cleft maxillary deficiency with distraction osteogenesis: procedure and results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115(1) : 1, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70310-0
  8. Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Friede H, Ko EW : Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(6) : 1382, 2004
  9. Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Ko EW : Maxillary distraction for the management of cleft maxillary hypoplasia with a rigid external distraction system. Semin Orthod 5(1) : 46, 1999
  10. Gateno J, Engel ER, Teichgraeber JF, Yamaji KE, Xia JJ : A new Le Fort I internal distraction device in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(1) : 148, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.09.010
  11. Hochban W, Ganss C, Austermann KH : Long-term results after maxillary advancement in patients with clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 30(2) : 237, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1993)030<0237:LTRAMA>2.3.CO;2
  12. Kessler P, Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Hirschfelder U, Neukam FW : Distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla and midface using a subcutaneous device: report of four cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(1) : 13, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.2000.0545
  13. Mofid MM, Manson PN, Robertson BC, Tufaro AP, Elias JJ, Vander Kolk CA : Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of 3278 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(5) : 1103, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200110000-00001
  14. Polley JW, Figueroa AA : Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. J Craniofac Surg 8(3) : 181, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199705000-00008
  15. Polley JW, Figueroa AA : Rigid external distraction: its application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(5) : 1360, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00007
  16. Posnick JC, Dagys AP : Skeletal stability and relapse patterns after Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy fixed with miniplates: the unilateral cleft lip and palate deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 94(7) : 924, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199412000-00004
  17. Rosenstein S, Kernahan D, Dado D, Grasseschi M, Griffith BH : Orthognathic surgery in cleft patients treated by early bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 87(5) : 835, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199105000-00003
  18. Ross RB : Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 24(1) : 5, 1987
  19. Satoh K, Mitsukawa N, Kadomatsu K, Tosa Y, Hosaka Y : Direct skeletal traction for Le Fort I halo distraction replacing an intraoral dental splint and connecting traction hook. Ann Plast Surg 53(4) : 348, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000120527.84027.48
  20. Kim MJ, Yun PY, Shin DJ, Kim SK, Kim JW, Kim KS : Case reports : step osteotomy technique through intraoral approach for mandibular distraction. The Korean J Maxillofac Plast Recon Seug 22(2) : 123, 2000
  21. Kim MJ, Yu HS, Kim JW, Kim KS : Skeletal stability after Le Fort I osteotomy in the cleft patients. The Korean J Cleft Lip Palate 2(1) : 15, 1999