Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회지)

The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation between Nutrient Components of Grass Roughages Mainly Used in Korea

국내 주요 화본과 조사료의 영양성분 간 상관관계

  • Published : 2005.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To evaluate the possibility of predicting a specific nutrient component, which nay be difficult in analysis, from a component of nutrient relatively easy to analyze, six grass roughage sources (bermuda grass hay, klein grass hay, oat hay, orchard grass straw, tall fescue straw and timothy hay) mainly used in Korea were analyzed for the heat-stable $\alpha-amylase$ treated neutral detergent fiber (aNDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), neutral detergent insoluble crude protein (NDICP) and acid detergent insoluble crude protein (ADICP) as well as proximate analytical components, and correlation coefficients between nutrient components were calculated. Some chemical components appeared to have significant correlation (p<0.05) through Pearson's correlation coefficients (i.e. between crude protein (CP) and NDICP in oat hay, orchard grass straw and tall fescue, between CP and ADICP in oat hay and timothy hay, between crude fiber (CF) and aNDF in klein grass hay, tall fescue straw and timothy hay, between CF and ADF in oat hay, tall fescue straw and timothy hay, and between CF and ADL in orchard pass straw and timothy hay). It is therefore suggested that it would be worthy to predict a specific nutrient component, which may be difficult in analysis such as aNDF, ADF, ADL, NDICP and ADICP, from a component of nutrient relatively easy to analyze such as CP and CF. However, it would be needed to improve the correlation coefficients, more samples should be measured.

본 연구에서는 국내에서 반추가축용 조사료 원으로 많이 사용하고 있는 화본과 수입조사료 6종(bermuda grass hay, klein grass hay, oat hay, orchard grass straw, tall fescue straw and timothy hay)에 대하여 최근 NRC의 nutrient requirements of daily cattle(7th revised edition, 2001)에서 권장하는 사료의 영양성분 분석방법에 따라 일반조성분과 함께 heat-stable $\alpha-amylase$ treated neutral detergent fiber (aNDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin(ADL), neutral detergent insoluble crude protein(NDICP)과 acid detergent insoluble crude protein(ADICP) 등의 함량을 분석하고 영양성분간의 Pearson의 상관계수를 산출하였다. 조사료에 따라 다소 차이는 있으나 oat hay는 CP와 NDICP(p<0.05), CP와 ADICP(p<0.01)의 상관관계가 높게 나타났고, orchard grass straw는 CP와 NDICP의 상관관계가 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). Tall fescue straw도 CP와 NDICP의 상관관계가 높게 나타났으며(p<0.01), timothy hay는 CP와 ADICP의 상관관계가 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). Klein grass hay는 CF와 aNDF (p<0.01), oat hay는 CF와 ADF(p<0.05), orchard grass straw는 CF와 ADL(p<0.05), tall fescue straw는 CF와 aNDF(p<0.01), CF와 ADF(p<0.01), timothy hay는 CF와 aNDF(p<0.01), CF와ADF(p<0.05), CF와 ADL(p<0.01)에서 높은 상관관계를 나타내었다. 이렇게 영양성분 간에 상관관계가 높은 성분들 간에는 앞으로 조사료의 영양성분에 영향을 미치는 제 요인들을 고정하여 상관관계를 조사하고, 분석점수를 많이 하여 회귀식을 만들 수 있다면 수입조사료 평가에 실질적인 적용이 가능할 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 농업협동조합. 2002. 2002년 농업협동조합통계
  2. Albrecht, K.A., W.F. Wedin and D.R. Buxton. 1987. Cell-wall composition and digestibility of alfalfa stems and leaves. Crop Sci., 27:735-741 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183X002700040027x
  3. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed, A.O.A.C., Arlington, VA
  4. Buxton, D.R. 1990. Cell-wall components in divergent germplasm of four perennial forage grass species. Crop Sci. 29:213-219
  5. Buxton, D.R. 1996. Quality-related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 59: 37-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00885-3
  6. Cherney, D.J.R. 1993. In vitro digestion kinetics and quality of perennial grasses as influenced by forage maturity. J. Daily Sci. 76:790-797 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77402-0
  7. David, R.M. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. JAOAC. 85:6
  8. Licitra, G., T.M. Hernandez and P.J. Van Soest. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim. feed Sci. Technol. 57:347-358 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3
  9. Minson, DJ. 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. Academic Press, New York
  10. National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of diry cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC
  11. Pichard, D.G.R. 1977. Forage nutritive value. Continuous and batch in vitro rumen fermentations and nitrogen solubility. Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY
  12. SAS package. 1985. SAS Institute Inc
  13. Traxler, M.J., D.G. Fox, P.J. Van Soest, A.N. Pell, C.E. Lascano, D.P.D. Lanna, J.E. Moore, R.P. Lana, M. Velez and A. Flores. 1998. Predicting forage indigestible NDF from lignin concentration. J. Anim. Sci. 76, 1469-1480
  14. Van Soest, P.J. 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the ruminant (2th Ed.). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
  15. Van Soest, P.J. 1996. Environment and forage quality. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. for Feed Manuf. p 1. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY
  16. Van Soest, PJ., D.R. Mertens and B. Deinum. 1978. Preharvest factos influencing quality of conserved forage. J. Anim. Sci. 47:712-720
  17. Weiss, W.P., H.R. Conrad and N.R.S. Pierre. 1992. A theoretically-based model for predicting total digestible nutrient values of forages and concentrates. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 39:95-110 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90034-4