Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society (한국지반공학회논문집)

Korean Geotechnical Society (한국지반공학회)
권호 표지

Assessment of Static and Cyclic Load Model Test on Soft Clay Layer Reinforced by Geosynthetics

토목섬유로 보강한 연약지반의 정$\cdot$반복하중 모형실험에 의한 평가

  • Published : 2005.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Each static and cyclic load test was performed in a laboratory model test. As a result, ground displacement decreased and bearing capacity of the soil increased owing to the sheer strength of geosynthetics in general. In addition, numerical analysis was operated using Mohr-Coulomb, Modified Cam-Clay models, and FLAC 4.0 2D and compared with the laboratory model test. The results were shown to be of a great difference because the existing equations had not considered the characteristics that sheer strength increases with a load increment. Therefore, this paper proposes an equation of cable elements considering an effect of load given through repeated tests.

실내 모형실험으로 정,반복하중 재하 실험을 실시하여 하중과 침하, 지중 측방변위, 토목섬유 변위 등을 측정한 결과 지반과의 마찰과 토목섬유 인장력의 영향으로 전반적으로 지반의 변위가 줄고 지지력이 증가하였다. 또한 Mohr-coulomb 및 수정Mohr-Coulomb 모델들과 FLAC 4.0 2D을 사용하여 수치해석을 실시하였고 실내 모형 실험결과와 비교하였다. 기존식들은 토목섬유 모델링시 FLAC의 케이블 요소는 하중증가에 따른 전단강도를 증가되는 특성을 고려할수 없었기 때문에 실험 결과치와 상이하게 나타났다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 반복적인 학습으로 상재 하중의 영향을 고려한 케이블 구성요소의 적절한 식을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 고홍석 (1987), 토목섬유 보강이 점토의 역학적 거동에 미치는 영향. 박사학위논문, 서울대학교, pp.38-112
  2. 손숭종 (1990), Geogrid와 Geotextile에 의한 지반보강 효과의 실험 및 해석, 박사학위논문, 전남대학교, pp.91-115
  3. 주재우 등 (2003), 토목섬유-Sand Mat 로 보강한 지반의 지지력 연구, 대한 토목학회 정기 학술대회 논문집, pp.3163-1369
  4. 황순종 (1989), Geotextile을 이용한 모형 연약 지반의 거동 연구, 석사학위논문, 전남대학교, pp.15-37
  5. Adams, M.T. and Collin, J. C. (1997), 'Large Model Spread Footing Load Test s on Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Foundations' Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 123, No.1, pp.66-72 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:1(66)
  6. Andrawes, K.Z., A. McGown, M.M., Mashhour and R.F. Wilson-Fahrny, and (1982), 'The finite element methods of analysis applied to soil geotextile systems', Proc. of the 2nd lnt'l, Conf. on Geotextile, Vol.3, pp.695-700
  7. Ashmawy, A.K and Bourdeau. P. L. (1995), 'Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soils Under Repeatehodd Loading : A Review and Comparative Design Study', Geosynthetics International, Vol.2, No.4, pp.643-678
  8. Binquet, J. and Lee, K.L. (1975), 'Bearing capacity analysis of reinforced earth slabs', Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol.101, No.GT 12, pp.1257-1276
  9. Cernica, J.W (1995), Geotechnical Engineering: Foundation Design, pp.113-134
  10. Das, B.M. and Omar, M.T. (1994), 'The Effect s of Foundation Width on Model Tests for Bearing Capacity of Sand with Geogrid Reinforcement', Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol.12, No.2, pp.133-141 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429771
  11. Das, B.M. and Shin, E.C. (1998), 'Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Strip Foundation on Geogrid-Reinforced Sand', 4th International Symposium on Environmental Geotechnical and Global S us tainable Development
  12. Guido, V.A., Chang, D.K. and Sweeney, M.A. (1986), 'Comparison of Geogrid and Geotextile Reinforced Earth Slabs', anadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.23, No.4, pp.436-440
  13. G.V. RAO & R.K. DUTTA. (2002), 'Testing and application of coir based geotextiles', 7th International Conference on Geosynthetics, pp.955-958
  14. J.G. Collin, T.C. Kinney and X. Fu. (1996), 'Full scale highway load test of flexible pavement systems with geogrid reinforced base courses', Geosynthetics International, pp.537-548
  15. McGown, A., K.Z. Andrawes, M.M. Mashhour and B. Myles (1981), 'strain behaviour of soil-fabric model embankments' proc. of the 10th int,l. Conf. on SM and FE, Stockholm, pp.739-744