ELASTOKINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF A SUSPENSION SYSTEM WITH LINEAR RECURSIVE FORMULA

  • KANG J. S. (GM Daewoo Auto&Technology)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

This paper presents linear algebraic equations in the form of recursive formula to compute elastokinematic characteristics of a suspension system. Conventional methods of elastokinematic analysis are based on nonlinear kinematic constrant equations and force equilibrium equations for constrained mechanical systems, which require complicated and time-consuming implicit computing methods to obtain the solution. The proposed linearized elastokinematic equations in the form of recursive formula are derived based on the assumption that the displacements of elastokinematic behavior of a constrained mechanical system under external forces are very small. The equations can be easily computerized in codes, and have the advantage of sharing the input data of existing general multi body dynamic analysis codes. The equations can be applied to any form of suspension once the type of kinematic joints and elastic components are identified. The validity of the method has been proved through the comparison of the results from established elastokinematic analysis software. Error estimation and analysis due to piecewise linear assumption are also discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Bundrof, R. T. (1976). The cornering compliance concept for description of vehicle directional control properties. SAE Paper No. 760713
  2. Ellis, J. R., Bums, S. C., Garrot, W. R. and Bell, S. C. (1987). The design of a suspension parameter measurement device. SAE Paper No. 870576
  3. Erdogan, L., Guenther, D. A. and Heydinger, G. J. (1999). Suspension parameter measurement using side-pull test to enhance modeling of vehicle roll. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-1323
  4. Gorder, K. V., David, T. and Basas, J. (2000). Steering and suspension test and analysis. SAE Paper No. 200001-1626
  5. Kasprzak, E. M. and Milliken, D. L. (2000). MRA vehicle dynamics simulation-Matlab/Simulink. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-1624
  6. Lee, S. B., Park, J. R. and Yim, H. J. (2002). Numerical approximation of vehicle joint stiffness by using response surface method. Int. J. Automotive Technology 3, 3, 117-122
  7. Mani, N. K., Haug, E. J. and Atkinson, K. E. (1985). Application of singular value decomposition for analysis of mechanical system dynamics. ASME J. Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 107,82-87 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3258699
  8. Min, H. K., Lee, J. M. and Tak, T. O. (1997). Kinematic design sensitivity analysis of suspension systems using direct differentiation. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 5, 1, 38-48
  9. Nikravesh, P. E. (1988). Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs. NJ
  10. Orlandea, N., Chase, M. A. and Calahan, D. A. (1977). A sparsity-oriented approach to the dynamic analysis and design of mechanical systems - Part I and II. ASME J. Engineering for Industry, 99, 773-784 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3439312
  11. Shimatani, H., Murata, S., Watanabe, K., Kaneko, T. and Sakai, H. (1999). Development of Torsion beam rear suspensoin system with toe control links. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0045
  12. Tsukuda, Y., Tsubota, Y., Tonomura, H. and Noguchi, H. (1988). Development of a new multi-link rear suspension. SAE Paper No. 881774
  13. Wehage, R. A. and Haug E. J. (1982). Generalized coordinate partitioning for dimension reduction in analysis of constrained dynamic system. ASME J. Mechanical Design, 104,247-255 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3256318
  14. Zhang, L. J., Lee, C. M. and Wang, Y. S. (2002). A study on nonstationary random vibration of a vehicle in time and frequency domains. Int. J. Automotive Technology 3, 3, 101-109