Optimum Design of a Pin-Fins Type Heat Sink Using the CFD and Mathematical Optimization

  • Park, Kyoung-Woo (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hoseo University) ;
  • Oh, Park-Kyoun (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hoseo University) ;
  • Lim, Hyo-Jae (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hoseo University)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

The shape of $7\times7$ pin-fins heat sink is optimized numerically to obtain the minimum pressure drop and thermal resistance. In this study, the fin height (h), fin width (w), and fan-to-heat sink distance (c) are chosen as the design variables and the pressure drop $({\Delta}P)$ and thermal resistance $(\theta_j)$ are adopted as the objective functions. To obtain the optimum design values, we used the finite volume method for calculating the objective functions, the BFGS method for solving the unconstrained non-linear optimization problem, and the weighting method for predicting the multi-objective problem. The results show that the optimum design variables for the weighting coefficient of 0.5 are as follows: W=4.653 mm, h=59.215mm, and c=2.667mm. The objective functions corresponding to the optimal design are calculated as ${\Delta}P=6.82$ Pa and $(\theta_j)=0.56K/W$. The Pareto solutions are also presented for various weighting coefficients and they will offer very useful data to design the pin-fins heat sink.

Keywords

References

  1. Gallman, J. W., Smith, S. C. and Kroo, I. M., 1993, Optimization of joined-wing aircraft, J of Aircraft, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 897-905 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46432
  2. Craig, K. J., Venter, P. V., de Kock, D. J. and Suyman, J. A., 1999, Optimisation of structured grid spacing parameters for separated flow simulation using mathematical optimization, J. of Wind Enginering and Industrial Aero- dynamics, Vol. 80, pp. 221-231 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00208-6
  3. Park, K., Choi, D. H. and Lee, K. S., 2003, Design optimization of plate-fin and tube heat exchanger, Numerical Heat Transfer Part A, Vol. 45, pp. 347-361 https://doi.org/10.1080/10407780490250391
  4. Ledezma, G., Morega, A. M. and Bejan, A., 1996, Optimal spacing between pin fins with impinging flow, ASME J. of Heat Transfer, Vol. 118, pp. 570-577 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2822670
  5. Maveety, J. G. and Hendricks, J. F., 1999, A heat sink performance study considering material, geometry, nozzle placement, and Reynolds number with air impingement, ASME J. of Electronic Packaging, Vol. 121, pp. 156-161 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2792678
  6. Maveety, J. G. and Jung, H. R., 2000, Design of an optimal pin-fin heat sink with air impingement cooling, Int. Comm. Haet Mass Transfer, Vol. 27, pp. 229-240 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1933(00)00104-4
  7. Rodi, W., 1984, Turbulence models and their applications in hydraulics a state-art-of review, Book Publication of International Association for Hydraulic Research, Delft, Netherlands
  8. Abe, K., Kondoh, T. and Nagano, Y., 1996, A two-equation heat transfer model reflecting second-moment closures for wall and free turbulent flows, Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 17, pp. 228-237 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-727X(96)00037-9
  9. Koski, J., 1984, Multicreterion optimization in structural design, in New directions in optimum structural design, John Wiley, New York, pp. 483-503
  10. FLUENT 6 User's Guide, FLUENT Inc., 2003
  11. Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere, Washington
  12. Nocedal, J., 1992, Theory of algorithms for unconstrained optimization, Acta Numerica, Vol. 1, pp. 199-242 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492900002270