Three Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship on the Fungicidal Activities of New Novel 2-Alkoxyphenyl-3-phenylthioisoindoline-1-one Derivatives Using the Comparative Molecular Field Analyses (CoMFA) Methodology Based on the Different Alignment Approaches

상이한 정렬에 따른 비교 분자장 분석(CoMFA) 방법을 이용한 새로운 2-Alkoxyphenyl-3-phenylthioisoindoline-1-one 유도체들의 살균활성에 관한 3차원적인 정량적 구조와 활성과의 관계

  • Sung, Nack-Do (Division of Applied Biologies and Chemistry, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yoon, Tae-Yong (Research Institute, Dongbang Agro Corporation) ;
  • Song, Jong-Hwan (Cytosine Laboratory, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Jung, Hoon-Sung (Division of Applied Biologies and Chemistry, Chungnam National University)
  • 성낙도 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물화학부) ;
  • 윤태용 (동방 아그로(주) 연구소) ;
  • 송종환 (한국화학연구원 세포화학연구팀) ;
  • 정훈성 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물화학부)
  • Published : 2005.03.31

Abstract

3D QSAR studies for the fungicidal activities against resistive phytophthora blight (RPC; 95CC7303) and sensitive phytophthora blight (Phytopthora capsici) (SPC; 95CC7105) by a series of new 2-alkoxyphenyl-3-phenylthioisoindoline-1-one derivatives (X: A=propynyl & B=2-chloropropenyl) were studied using comparative molecular field analyses (CoMFA) methodology. The CoMFA models were generated from the two different alignment, atom based fit (AF) alignment and field fit (FF) alignment. The atom based alignment exhibited a higher statistical results than that of field fit alignment. The best models, A3 and A7 using combination fields of H-bond field, standard field, LUMO and HOMO molecular orbital field as additional descriptors were selected to improve the statistic of the present CoMFA models. The statistical results of the two models showed the best predictability of the fungicidal activities based on the cross-validated value $q^2\;(r^2_{cv.}=RPC:\;0.625\;&\;SPC:\;0.834)$, non cross-validated value $(r^2_{ncv.}=RPC:\;0.894\;&\;SPC:\;0.915)$ and PRESS value (RPC: 0.105 & SPC: 0.103), respectively. Based on the findings, the predictive ability and fitness of the model for SPC was better than that of the model for RPC. The fugicidal activities exhibited a strong correlation with steric $(66.8{\sim}82.8%)$, electrostatic $(10.3{\sim}4.6%)$ and molecular orbital field (SPC: HOMO, 12.6% and RPC: LUMO, 22.9%) factors of the molecules. The novel selective character for fungicidal activity between two fungi depend on the positive charge of ortho, meta-positions on the N-phenyl ring and size of hydrophilicity of a substituents on the S-phenyl ring.

새로운 2-alkoxyphenyl-3-phenylthioisoindoline-1-one 유도체(A & B)들의 치환기 변화에 따른 저항성(RPC; 95CC7303)과 감수성(SPC; 95CC7105) 고추역병 균주(Phyto pthora capsici)들의 살균활성에 대한 3차원적인 정량적 구조-활성관계(3D-QSAR)를 비교 분자장 분석(CoMFA) 방법으로 연구하였다. 정렬방법에 따라 field fit(FF) 보다는 atom based fit(AF) 정렬시에 양호한(AF>FF) 모델, A3 및 A7을 얻을 수 있었다. AF 정렬시, 부가적 설명인자로서 HOMO 및 LUMO 분자 궤도장이 추가된 H-bond와 standard field에서 유도된 균주별 두 모델의 cross-validated $r^2\;_{cv.}$$(q^2=0.625{\sim}0.834)$과 non cross-validated 값$(r^2_{ncv.}=0.894{\sim}0.915)$에 근거하여 SPC 균주의 살균활성에 대한 모델, A7이 RPC 균주의 살균활성에 대한 모델, A3보다 양호한 예측성(q2)을 나타내었다. 두 균주에 대한 살균활성은 분자의 입체장$(66.8{\sim}82.8%)$, 정전기장$(10.3{\sim}4.6%)$ 그리고 분자 궤도장(SPC: HOMO, 12.6% 및 RPC: LUMO, 22.9%)이 영향을 미치는 중요한 요소이었다. 두 균주에 대한 선택성은 N-phenyl 고리상 ortho, meta-위치의 양하전과 S-phenyl 고리상 치환기의 친수성의 크기에 의존적이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. FRAC (2002) Publications, FRAC fungicide group names and codes, Fungicide Ressistance and Action Committee/www.frac.info
  2. Leonard, G. C. and Hewitt, H. G. (1998) In Chemistry and Mode of Action of Crop Ptotection Agents. The Royal Society of Chemistry. UK
  3. Lee, Y. J. (2003) Analyses of 2D and 3D-QSARs on the protox inhibition activities of 2N-substituted-phenylisoindoline-1-one derivatives., MS Thesis, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
  4. Kang, E. K. (2002) Effect of 3-Thioalkoxy groups on the herbicidal activity of 2-(5-alkoxyphenyl)-3-phenylthioisoindoline- 1-one derivatives. MS Thesis, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
  5. Sung, N. D., Ock, H. S., Chung, H. J. and Song, J. H. (2003) Quantitative structure- activity relationship and molecular shape similarity of the herbicidal N-substituted phenyl-3,4-dimethylmaleimide derivatives. Kor. J. Pesticide Sci. 7, 100-107
  6. Sung, N. D., Ock, H. S., Chung, H. J. and Lee, Y. G. (2003) Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) on the growth inhibition activity of N-sub.phenyl-3,4,5,6- tetrahydrophthalimide and N-sub. phenyl-3,4-dimethylmaleimide derivatives, Kor. J. Pesticide Sci. 7, 75-82
  7. Tomlin, C. D. S. (2000) The Pesticide Manual (12th ed.), Britsh Crop Protection Council, 49 Downing Street, Farnham, Surrey GU9 7PH, UK
  8. Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E. and Bunce, J. D. (1988) Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), I. Effect of shape on the binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 5959-5967 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00226a005
  9. Klebe, G. (1993) In 3D QSAR Drug Design, Theory, Methos and Applications: Structural Alignment of Molecules ESCOM. (Kubinyi, H. ed.) Leiden. pp. 173-199
  10. Ryu, E. G., Kim J. Y., Song, J. H., Chung, G. H. and Kim, J. S. (1995) Herbicidal N-sub.phenyl-3,4-dimethyl-2-(S-sub.thio)- 5-oxo-2,5-dihydropyrrol derivatives and their synthetic method. Korea Papent, No 088511
  11. Yoon, T. Y. (2002) Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) on the fungicidal activity of 2-(5-alkoxyphenyl)-3-phenylthioisoindoline-1-one derivatives. Ph.D. Thesis, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
  12. Tripos Associates, Inc., 1699 S. Hanley Road, Suite 303, St. Louis, MO 63144-2913, USA, http://www.tripos.com/Bookshelf/qsar/
  13. Waller, C. L. and Marshall, G. R. (1993) Three-dimensional quantitative structure- activity relationship of angiotesinconverting enzyme and thermolysin inhibitors. 11. A comparasion of CoMFA models incorporating molecular orbital fields and desolvation free energies based on active-analog and complementary-receptor-field alignment rules. J. Med. Chem. 36, 2390-2403 https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00068a017
  14. Anand V. Raichurkar and Vithal M. Kulkarni (2003) Understanding the antitumor activity of novel hydroxysemicarbazide derivatives as ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors using CoMFA and CoMSIA. J. Med. Chem. 46, 4419-4427 https://doi.org/10.1021/jm030016a
  15. Kerr, R. (1994) Parallel helix bundles and ion channels: molecular modeling via simulated annealing and restrained molecular dynamics. Biophys. J. 67, 1501-1515 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80624-1
  16. Purcell, W. P. and Singer, J. A. (1967) A brief review and table of semiempirical parameters used in the Huckel molecular orbital method. J. Chem. Eng. Data 122, 235-246
  17. Marshall, G. R., Barry, C. D., H. E. Bosshard, R. A. Dammkoehler, D. A. Dunn (1979) In Computer-assisted drug design: The conformational parameter in drug design; active analog approach. Olsen, E. C. and Christoffersen, R. E. (eds), Ammerican Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. pp. 205-226
  18. Clark, M., Cramer III, R. D., Jones, D. M., Patterson, D. E. and Simeroth, P. E. (1990) Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 2. Toward its use with 3D-structural databases. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 3, 47-59 https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5529(90)90120-W
  19. Kellogg, G. E., Semus, S. F. and Abraham, D. J. (1991) HINT: A new method of empirical hydophobic field calculation for CoMFA. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 5, 545-552 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135313
  20. Cramer, R. D., Bunce, J. D. and Patterson, D. E. (1988) Crossvalidation, bootstrapping, and partial least squares compared with multiple regression in conventional QSAR studies. Quant. Struct. -Act. Relat. 7, 18-25 https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.19880070105
  21. Sung, N. D. and Song, S. S. (2003) Range of physicochemical parameters for active ingredients of fungicides and insectcides as crop protection agents. J. Kor. Soc. Agric. Chem. Biotechnol. 46, 280-284
  22. Tanaka, S., Takahashi, M., Funaki, Y., Izumi, K., Takano, H. and Miyakado (1995) In Classical and Three-Dimensional QSAR in Agrochemistry: Hydrophobicity and Systemic Activities of Fungicidal Triazoles and Blaching Herbicidal Compounds. Hansch, C and Fujita, T. (eds.) Ch. 8., ACS Symposium Series 606, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA