Corporate Social Responsibility: A Survey of the Italian SA8000 Certified Companies

  • Rosa Salvatore La (Department of National Accounting and Analysis of Social Processes, University of Palermo) ;
  • Franco Eva Lo (Interdepartmental Research Centre for Economic and Territorial Monitoring University of Palermo)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

Today's society requires companies to act more and more effectively for the general good, by respecting human rights and the environment. Innovative and enlightened companies try to meet this need through the adoption of several initiatives. Accordingly, the International Standard Organisation is now working on attempts to unify these initiatives and to formulate an internationally recognised standard, providing guidance to companies on social responsibility. Currently the SA8000 international standard is the most often used tool-based on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) philosophy - which guarantees the respect of fundamental workers' rights. Since 2003, Italy holds the world record for its number of SA8000 certified companies. This paper discusses the findings of a two-stage survey of the Italian SA8000 certified companies carried out over the last two years. The focus of the survey is on both reasons and effects of the implementation of SA8000 standard. In the first stage the rate of response was very high while in the second stage it was satisfactory. The results provide a clear picture of the companies and their degree of achievement and awareness of the fundamental principles of human resource management. A section of the survey deals with some issues related to the Public Sector.

Keywords

References

  1. Agresti, A.(1990), Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons
  2. Arauz R. and Suzuki, H.(2004), 'ISO 9000. Performance in Japanese Industries,' Total Quality Management, Vol. 15, No.1, pp. 3-33
  3. CEPAA(1997), Social Accountability 8000, Council on Economics Priorities Accreditation Agency, New York, NY
  4. Cochran, W. G.(1997), Sampling Techniques, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons
  5. Cragg, W.(2000), 'Human Rights and Business Ethics: Fashioning a New Social Contract,' Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 27, pp. 205-214 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006488202305
  6. European Commission(2001), Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility-Green Paper, Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, ISBN 92-894-1478-2
  7. Hamschmidt J. and Dyllick T.(2001), 'ISO 14001. Profitable? Yes! But is it eco-effective?,' Greener Management International, No. 34, pp. 43-54
  8. Hayes, B. E.(1998), Measuring Customer Satisfaction: Survey Design, Use, and Statistical Analysis Methods, 2nd Edition, ASQ
  9. Keim, G. D.(1978), 'Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Enlightened Self-interest Model,' The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 32-39 https://doi.org/10.2307/257574
  10. Kolk, A. and Tulder, R. V.(2002), 'The Effectiveness of Self-regulation: Corporate Codes of Conduct and Child Labour,' European Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3 pp. 260-271 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00043-9
  11. La Rosa, S. and Lo Franco, E.(2004), 'On the Applicability of SA8000 in the Public Sector,' Proceedings of the 7th Toulon-Verona Conference: 'Quality in Services', Universite du Sud Toulon-Var, France, 2-3 September 2004
  12. Marc, J. T.(1999), 'The Institutional Determinants of Social Responsibility,' Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 20, No.2, pp. 163-179 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005871021412
  13. Mc Williams, A. and Siegel, D.(2001), 'Note - Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective,' Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No.1, pp. 117-127 https://doi.org/10.2307/259398
  14. Miles, M. P. and Munilla, L. S.(2004), 'The Potential Impact of Social Accountability Certification on Marketing: A Short Note,' Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 50, pp. 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000021139.94166.74
  15. Mills, A.(1999), 'Ethics goes Global: The DECO Council Recommendation on Improving Ethical Conduct in the Public Sector,' Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 58, No.2, pp. 61-69
  16. Punter, L. and Gangneaux, D.(1998), 'Social Accountability: The Most Recent Element to Ensure Total Quality Management,' Total Quality Management, Vol. 9, No. 4-5, pp. 196-198 https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412988893
  17. Rohitratana, K.(2002), 'SA8000: A Tool to Improve Quality of Life,' Management Auditing Journal, 17/1/2, pp. 60-64
  18. SAI website: www.sa-int.org
  19. Wilson, I.(2000), 'Note - The New Rules: Ethics, Social Responsibility and Strategy,' Strategy and Leadership, Vol. 20, No.3, pp. 12-16