Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop the ITS evaluation model using the Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) methodology and to demonstrate the goodness-of-fit of the large ITS projects through the comparative analysis between DEA and PRA model. The results of this study are summarized below. First, the evaluation mode] using PRA with Monte-Carlo Simulation(MCS) and Latin-Hypercube Sampling(LHS) is developed and applied to one of ITS projects initiated by local government. The risk factors are categorized with cost, benefit and social-economic factors. Then, PDF(Probability Density Function) parameters of these factors are estimated. The log-normal distribution, beta distribution and triangular distribution are well fitted with the market and delivered price. The triangular and uniform distributions are valid in benefit data from the simulation analysis based on the several deployment scenarios. Second, the decision making rules for the risk analysis of projects for cost and economic feasibility study are suggested. The developed PRA model is applied for the Daejeon metropolitan ITS model deployment project to validate the model. The results of cost analysis shows that Deterministic Project Cost(DPC), Deterministic Total Project Cost(DTPC) is the biased percentile values of CDF produced by PRA model and this project need Contingency Budget(CB) because these values are turned out to be less than Target Value(TV;85% value), Also, this project has high risk of DTPC and DPC because the coefficient of variation(C.V) of DTPC and DPC are 4 and 15 which are less than that of DTPC(19-28) and DPC(22-107) in construction and transportation projects. The results of economic analysis shows that total system and subsystem of this project is in type II, which means the project is economically feasible with high risk. Third, the goodness-of-fit of PRA model is verified by comparing the differences of the results between PRA and DEA model. The difference of evaluation indices is up to 68% in maximum. Because of this, the deployment priority of ITS subsystems are changed in each mode1. In results. ITS evaluation model using PRA considering the project risk with the probability distribution is superior to DEA. It makes proper decision making and the risk factors estimated by PRA model can be controlled by risk management program suggested in this paper. Further research not only to build the database of deployment data but also to develop the methodologies estimating the ITS effects with PRA model is needed to broaden the usage of PRA model for the evaluation of ITS projects.
본 연구는 결정적 경제성분석모형(Deterministic Economic Analysis : DEA)의 한계를 극복할 수 있는 확률적 위험도분석(Probabilistic Risk Analysis : PRA) 모형을 이용하여 ITS사업의 경제성평가모형을 개발하고 사례분석을 통해 모형의 적합성(Goodness-of-fit)과 유용성을 검증하는 것이다. 즉 ITS사업의 경제성에 영향을 미치는 위험변수를 확률밀도함수(PDF), 누적확률밀도함수(CDF)로 산출하고 몬테카를로 시뮬레이션기법(Monte-Carlo Simulation Approach : MCSA)을 통해 산출된 결과변수(사업비, 경제성지표)의 통계값에 대해 합리적인 의사결정 방법론을 정립하였다. 대규모 지방자치단체 ITS사업의 사례분석(대전광역시 첨단교통모델도시사업) 수행결과, 통합시스템의 사업비 총사업비는 PRA모형을 통해 산출된 확률분포 상에서 편의(Bias)된 백분율값으로 나타났으며, 사업비 총사업비의 변동계수가(각각 15, 4) 일반교통사업에 비해 낮아, ITS사업의 위험도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 PRA모형의 결과변수(B/C, NPA, IRP)가 변동가능한 사업환경 하에서 90%이상 모두 경제성이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 총사업비 사업비의 우발성비용(목표관리값 85%기준)이 발생하는 것으로 나타나 경제성은 높으나 사업비 초과 위험도는 높은 사업으로 분류되었다. 또한 DEA모형의 경제성평가지표는 PRA모형의 확률분포 상에 단일 %값(B/C:27%값, NPV:27%값, IRR:33%값)으로 나타나며, 평균값 또는 중앙값과 비교할 때, 경제성이 과소추정(Underestimate)되는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 단위시스템의 우선순위결과정에서 모형에 따라 우선순위가 바꾸는 결과가 나타났다. 특히 대규모 ITS사업의 경제성평가 시 DEA모형이 편의된 하나의 사례만으로 경제성을 평가함으로써, 경제성을 과대 과소추정하거나 비합리적인 투자우선 순위를 도출하는 오류를 범할수 있는 것으로 나타났다.
