Evaluation of Web Sites on Sexuality Education for the Adolescents

  • Moon, In-Ok (Department of Health Education. Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Hye-Kyeong (Department of Health Management, Hyupsung University)
  • Published : 2005.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the quality of the information and characteristics associated with information packaging, and develop suggestions for how this web site might be improved. Methods: The 50 sites were selected for evaluation. Inclusion criteria for evaluation were the purpose and the popularity of the sites. Two kinds of evaluation tool were employed for the analysis: one that evaluate the quality of information and the design of the web sites, and another that evaluate the covered contents. A scoring system allowed the sites point on yes/no basis on the evaluation items. The association between quality of the web sites on sexuality education and their site characteristics were assessed using ANOVA. Conclusions: Major conclusions were as follows. First, the scope and currency of the selected web sites were found to be appropriate. Second, the authority of the information was found to be the most serious problem of the selected sites. Third, the category of sexual behavior found to be the most frequently mentioned and sexual health was the second. The least mentioned category was personal skills. Finally, sites operated by private organization were found to have more accurate information and better design feature than those operated by public organization and/or individual.

Keywords

References

  1. Barak, A. and Fisher, W.A. 2001. Toward an Internet-driven, Theoretically-based, Innovative Approach to Sex Education. Journal of Sex Research 38(4):324-332 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490109552103
  2. Cline, R.J. and Haynes, K.M. 2001. Consumer Health Information Seeking on the Internet: the State of the Art. Health Education Research 16(6): 671-692 https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.6.671
  3. Flowers-Coulson, P.A., Kushner, M.A. and Bankowski. 2000. The Information is Out There, But is Anyone getting It? Adolescent Misconceptions About Sexuality Education and Reproductive Health and the Use of the Internet to Get Answers. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy 25(2&3): 178-188 https://doi.org/10.1080/01614576.2000.11074346
  4. Griffiths, K.M. and Christensen, H. 2000. Quality of Web Based Information on Treatment of Depression: Cross Sectional Survey. BMJ 321(16):1511-1515 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1511
  5. Jadad, A.R. and Gagliardi, A.G. 1998. Rating Health Information on the Internet. JAMA 279(8):611-614
  6. Kang, N.M., Hyun, T.S., Lee, P.R. and Kim, J. 2001. Application of Evaluation Criteria for Web Sites to Sexuality Education. The Journal of Korean Women's Health Nursing Academic Society 7(3):373-381
  7. Kotecki, J.E., and Chamness, B.E. 1999. A Valid Tool for Evaluating Health-Related WWW Sites. Journal of Health Education 30(1):56-59 https://doi.org/10.1080/10556699.1999.10628753
  8. National Internet Development Agency of Korea. 2003. Internet Usage Patterns in Korea and Japan
  9. Oh, Y.M. 2000. A Study on the Evaluation of Health Information on the Web. MPH Thesis, Department of Health Education, Ewha Womans University, Korea
  10. Pealer, L.N. and Dorman S.M. 1997. Evaluating Health-Related Web Sites. Journal of School Health 67(6):232-235 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1997.tb06311.x
  11. Smith, M., Gertz, E., Alvarez, S. and Lurie, P. 2000. The content and Accessibility of Sex Education Information on the Internet. Health Education & Behavior 27(6):684-694 https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700603
  12. Sohn, A. and Lee, S.M. 2002. Quality Management for Health Information Sites on the Internet. Journal of Korean Public health Association 28(1):89-94
  13. Stout, P.A., Villegas, J. and Kim, H. 2001. Enhancing Learning through Use of Interactive Tools on Health-Related Web Sites. Health Education Research 16(6):721-733 https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.6.721
  14. Wilson, S.N. 2001. Learning about Sexuality From the Internet. Independent School 60(2):50-55