The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지

Nonextraction treatment of Class II division 2 in an adult patient using microimplant anchorage (MIA)

Microimplant Anchorage(MIA)를 이용한 II급 2류 성인 환자의 비발치 치험례

  • Chae, Jong-Moon (Department of Dentistry and Orthodontics, Eulji University)
  • Published : 2005.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Maxillary anterior teeth were intruded and lingually root torqued with two maxillary anterior microimplants between the lateral incisors and canines. Overerupted maxillary canines were intruded with two other microimplants between the maxillary canines and first premolars. Maxillary posterior teeth and canines were distalized, then the maxillary incisors were retracted with two maxillary posterior microimplants between the first and second molars. The mandibular anterior teeth were intruded and the mandibular posterior teeth were extruded with conventional method such as anterior bite plane, intrusion arch and Class II elastics. The mandible moved slightly forward after the correction of deep bite and retroclination of the upper incisors. Consequently, microimplant anchorage (MIA) provided absolute anchorage for simultaneous correction of Class II canine and molar relationships and deep overbite.

상악 측절치와 견치의 치근 사이에 식립한 microimplant를 이용하여 상악 전치의 합임과 설측으로의 치근 이동을 얻을 수가 있었으며, 상악 견치와 제1소구치의 치근 사이에 식립한 microimplant를 이용하여 과맹출된 상악 견치를 함입시켰다. 또한 상악 제1, 2대구치의 치근 사이에 식립한 microplant를 이용하여 상악 견치 및 구치의 후방 이동 및 상악 전치의 후방 견인을 시행하였다. Anterior bite plane과 intrusion arch, 그리고 II급 고무 등과 같은 전통적인 방법을 사용하여 하악 전치의 합입 및 구치부의 정출을 얻을 수가 있었으며, 과개 교합 및 상악 전치의 설측 경사가 해소 되면서 하악골이 전방으로 약간 이동하였다. 이와 같이, MIA는 II급 2류 부정교합환자에 있어서 II급 견치 및 구치 관계 그리고 과개 교합을 동시에 해소 하는데 절대적인 고정원을 제공하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hitchkock HP. The cephalometric distinction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1976:69:447-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90211-6
  2. Brezniak N, Arad A, Heller M, Dinbar A, Dinte A, Wasserstein A. Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class II Division 2 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2002:72:251-7
  3. Arvystas MG. Nonextraction treatment of severe Class II, Division 2 malocclusions. Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97;510-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80032-0
  4. Ferreira SL. Class II Division 2 deep overbite malocclusion correction with nonextraction therapy and Class II elastics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998:114:166-75 https://doi.org/10.1053/od.1998.v114.a87601
  5. Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1983:17:266-9
  6. Chae JM. Directional forces using skeletal anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class II div.1 malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 2004:34:197-203
  7. Park HS, Kwon TG, Sung JH. Nonextraction treatment with microscrew implants. Angle Orthod 2004:74:539-49
  8. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dent Cosmos 1899:41 :24864, 350-7
  9. Delevianis HP, Kuftinec MM. Variation in morphology of the maxillary cetral incisors found in Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1980;78:438-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90024-X
  10. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Class II division 2 malocclusion: a heritable pattern of small teeth in well-developed jaws. Angle Orthod 1998:6:9-20
  11. Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The Class II Division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000:22:529-35 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.5.529
  12. Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod 1977:72:1-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90121-X
  13. Kinzel J. Aberschek P, Mischak I, Droschl H. Study of the extent of torque, protrusion and intrusion of the incisors in the context of Class II, division 2 treatment in adults. J Orofac Orthop 2002:63:283-99 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-002-0109-2
  14. Uribe F, Nanda R. Treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusion in adults: biomechanical considerations. J Clin Orthod 2003:37:599-606
  15. Demisch A, Ingervall B, Ther U. Mandibular displacement in Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 102:509-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70067-K
  16. Ellenbogen R, Swara N. The improvement of the gummy smile using the implant spacer technique. Ann Plast Surg 1984:12:16-24 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198401000-00004
  17. Matarasso SL, Matarasso A. Treatment guidelines for botulinum toxin type A for the periocular region and a report on partial upper lip ptosis following injections to the lateral canthal rhytids. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:208-14: discussion 215-7 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200107000-00033
  18. Polo M. Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of excessive gingival display. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005:127:214-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.013
  19. Riedel RA. A review of the retention problem. Angle Orthod 1960:30; 179-99
  20. Canut JA, Arias S. A long-term evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions: a retrospective study model analysis. Eur J Orthod 1999:21:377-86 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.4.377
  21. Engel G, Cornforth G, Damerell JM, Gordon J, Levy P, McAlpine J. et al. Treatment of deep-bite cases. Am J Orthod 1980:77:1-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90220-1
  22. Sheridan JJ, McMinn R, LeDoux W. Essix thermosealed appliances: various orthodontic uses. J Clin Orthod 1995:29: 108-13