Bony change of apical lesion healing process using fractal analysis

프랙탈 분석을 이용한 치근단병소 치유과정의 골 변화

  • Lee Ji-Min (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park Hyok (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jeong Ho-Gul (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim Kee-Deog (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park Chang-Seo (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 이지민 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선과학교실) ;
  • 박혁 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선과학교실) ;
  • 정호걸 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선과학교실) ;
  • 김기덕 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선과학교실) ;
  • 박창서 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

Purpose : To investigate the change of bone healing process after endodontic treatment of the tooth with an apical lesion by fractal analysis. Materials and Methods Radiographic images of 35 teeth from 33 patients taken on first diagnosis, 6 months, and 1 year after endodontic treatment were selected. Radiographic images were taken by JUPITER Computerized Dental X-ray $System^{(R)}$. Fractal dimensions were calculated three times at each area by Scion Image $PC^{(R)}$ program. Rectangular region of interest $(30\times30)$ were selected at apical lesion and normal apex of each image. Results : The fractal dimension at apical lesion of first diagnosis $(L_0)$ is $0.940{\pm}0.361$ and that of normal area $(N_0)$ is $1.186{\pm}0.727(p<0.05)$. Fractal dimension at apical lesion of 6 months after endodontic treatment $(L_1)$ is $1.076{\pm}0.069$ and that of normal area $ (N_1)$ is $1.192{\pm}0.055(p<0.05)$. Fractal dimension at apical lesion of 1 year after endodontic treatment $(L_2)$ is $1.163{\pm}0.074$ and that of normal area $(N_2)$ is $1.225{\pm}0.079(p<0.05)$. After endodontic treatment, the fractal dimensions at each apical lesions depending on time showed statistically significant difference. And there are statistically significant different between normal area and apical lesion on first diagnosis, 6 months after, 1 year after. But the differences were grow smaller as time flows. Conclusion : The evaluation of the prognosis after the endodontic treatment of the apical lesion was estimated by bone regeneration in apical region. Fractal analysis was attempted to overcome the limit of subjective reading, and as a result the change of the bone during the healing process was able to be detected objectively and quantitatively.

Keywords