Management Science and Financial Engineering

The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회)
권호 표지

Dynamics of Industry-wide versus Firm-specific Benefits when Firms Collaborate on Building an Industry Infrastructure

  • Kim Bowon (Graduate School of Management Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Lee Seungchul (KAIST Graduate School of Management)
  • Published : 2005.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Firms often collaborate on building an infrastructure, which benefits all the firms in the industry, although in unequal magnitudes. Then a difficult and tricky issue is concerned with 'free riding.' Should there be only 'common, i.e., industry-wide' benefits in such collaboration, the literature indicated that the free rider problem is unavoidable, In this paper, however, we suggest that while collaborating, the firm also learns firm-specific knowledge, experience, and know-how, which can be directly utilized for its own internal improvement. That is, the collaboration between firms provides them with not only 'industry-wide,' but also 'firm-specific' benefits, Our analysis shows that if there indeed exist two types of benefits simultaneously, depending on the balance between the two, the free rider problem can be mitigated or even eliminated.

Keywords

References

  1. Amaldoss, W., R. J. Meyer, J. S. Raju, and A. Rapoport, 'Collaborating to compete,' Marketing Science 19, 2 (2000), 105-126 https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.2.105.11804
  2. Baumol, W. J .. 'When is inter-firm coordination beneficial: The case of innovation,' International Journal of Industrial Organization 19 (2001),727-737 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00091-6
  3. Brandenburger, A. M. and B. Nalebuff, Co-opetition. New York: Currency/ Doubleday, 1996
  4. Buchholz, W. and K. A. Konrad, 'Strategic transfers and private provision of public goods,' Journal of Public Economics 57 (1995), 489-505 https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(95)80008-W
  5. Bureth, A., S. Wolff, and A. Zanfei, 'The two faces of learning by cooperating: The evolution and stability of inter-firm agreements in the European electronics industry,' Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 32 (1997), 519-537 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(97)00009-7
  6. Cadsby, C. B. and E. Maynes, 'Voluntary provision of threshold public goods with continuous contributions: experimental evidence,' Journal of Public Economics 71 (1999), 53-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00049-8
  7. Chari, V. V. and L. E. Jones, 'A reconsideration of the problem of social cost: free riders and monopolists,' Economic Theory 16 (2000), 1-22 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001990050324
  8. Depken, II, C. A., D. R. Kamerschen, and A. Snow, 'Generic advertising of intermediate goods: theory and evidence on free riding,' Review of Industrial Organization 20 (2002), 205-220 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015069023770
  9. Dickinson, D. L., 'The voluntary contributions mechanism with uncertain group payoffs,' Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 35 (1998), 517-533 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00048-1
  10. Dockner, E. J., S. Jorgensen, N. V. Long and G. Soger, Differential Games in Economics and Management Science, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2000
  11. Fershtman, C. and S. Nitzan, 'Dynamic voluntary provision of public goods,' European Economic Review 35 (1991), 1057-1067 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90004-3
  12. Jap, S. D., 'Pie-expansion efforts: Collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships,' Journal of Marketing Research 36, 4 (1999), 461-475 https://doi.org/10.2307/3152000
  13. Jap, S. D., 'Pie sharing in complex collaboration contexts,' Journal of Marketing Research 38, 1 (2001), 86-99 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.86.18827
  14. Kamien, M. I. and N. L. Schwartz, Dynamic Optimization: The calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management, NorthHolland, 1991
  15. Madhok, A. and S. B. Tallman, 'Resources, transactions and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships,' Organization Science 9, 3 (1998), 326-339 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.326
  16. Nault, B. R. and R. K. Tyagi, 'Implementable mechanisms to coordinate horizontal alliances,' Management Science 47, 6 (2001),787-799 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.6.787.9808
  17. Phillips, C. and M. Meeker, The B2B Internet Reports: Collaborative Commerce, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Equity Research, North America (April 2000), 2000
  18. Wathne, K. H. and J. B. Heide, 'Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions,' Journal of Marketing 64,4 (2000), 36-51 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.4.36.18070
  19. Wirl, F., 'Dynamic voluntary provision of public goods: extension for nonlinear strategies,' European Journal of Political Economy 12 (1996), 555-560 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(96)00016-X