Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지

Application of Landscape Ecology Indicators for Conservation Value Assessment

보전가치평가를 위한 경관생태학적 지표의 활용 및 적용

  • Published : 2005.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess conservation value of forests and cultivated areas from the landscape ecological point of view. The main focus of landscape ecology estimates the reciprocal relationships between spatial patterns and ecological processes. This paper sets the criteria for conservation value and classify the conservation value based on the criteria. Forests and cultivated areas in Seo-Gu, Incheon Metropolitan City was selected as the case study area. In this research, factors such as patch size and connectivity have been selected in order to consider the landscape ecological aspect, gradient for the environmental physics aspect and to consider the environment-ecological aspect, grade of environmental-oriented land suitability analysis Map developed by the ROK Ministry of Environment has been utilized. GIS methodologies have been adopted to calculate the relationships among the above variables. Through literature review, the following evaluation criteria have been adopted: (1) based on island biogeography and metapopulation dynamics theory, patch size criteria are set 2ha and 10ha; (2) connectivity was set the degree of connection with surrounding grids; and (3) gradient of 20 degrees. Conclusively, this paper suggests that local conditions, landscape ecology and physical environment aspects should be considered to develop an estimation framework of the conservation value.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토연구원(2003) 토지적성평가 매뉴얼
  2. 김명수(2002) 대도시 녹지 연결성과 생물이동성 평가기법 개발:경관생태학적 접근. 서울대학교 박사학위논문
  3. 나정화, 이정민(2002) 도시 비오톱의 경관생태학적 특성분석 -대구광역시를 사례로-. 한국조경학회지 30(6): 128-140
  4. 문태훈, 홍민선(2001) 지탱가능한 발전을 위한 서울시 환경 용량의 산정과 정책적 합의. 국토계획 36(4): 245-266
  5. 안동만, 박은관, 김인호 김명수, 박소영(1998) 서울시 주변 지역의 경관이질성 변화 분석기법 개발을 위한 기초연구. 한국 조경학회지 26(3): 288-296
  6. 안동만, 김명수(2003) 환경친화적인 도시공원녹지계획 연구. 한국조경학회지 31(1): 34-41
  7. 이동근, 윤소원(1998) 지속가능한 도시개발을 위한 환경지표에 관한 연구-인간과 자연과의 공생지표를 중심으로-. 환경영향 평가 7(1): 93-107
  8. 이동근, 전성우, 이상문(2004) 토지환경성평가의 이론 및 기준. 지도작성에 관한 연구. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 7(1):116-127
  9. 한국환경정책. 평가연구원(2003) 국토환경보전계획수립 연구. 환경부
  10. 環境法政策學會 (2000) 自然は守れみか. 東京部:商事法務硏究會
  11. Barnes, T. G.(1999) A Guide to Urban Habitat Conservation Planning. In www.ca.uky.edu/agc/pubs/for/for74/for74.htm (Nov. 2004)
  12. Collinge, S. K.(1996) Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 36: 59-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00341-6
  13. Cook. E. A.(2002) Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological network. Landscape and Urban Planning 58 : 269-280 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00226-2
  14. Kohn, D. D., and D. M. Walsh(1994) Rant species richness - the effect of island size and habitat diversity. J. of Ecology 82: 367-377 https://doi.org/10.2307/2261304
  15. Lee. J. T., S. J. Woddy. and S. Thompson(2001) Targeting sites for conservation: Using a patch-based ranking scheme to assess conservation potential. Joumal of Environmental Management 61: 367-380 https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0419
  16. John, L., G. Meir, and F. John(1995) Greeiiway planning: developing a landscape ecological network approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 33: 179-193 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)02017-A
  17. Lomolino, M. V., and M. D. Weiser(2001) Towards a more general species-area relationship: diversity on all island, great and small. Journal of Biogeography 28: 431-445 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00550.x
  18. MacArthur, R. H. and E. O. Wilson(1963) An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17: 373-387 https://doi.org/10.2307/2407089
  19. Johannes, P., W. Thomas, P. Chnstoph, S. Ingrid, K, Andrea, S. Erich, R. Karl, S. Wemer. S. Franz. and B. Helmut(2004) Evaluating the ecological sustainability of Austrian aghcu-Itural landscape-the SINUS approach. Land Use Policy 21:307-320 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.011
  20. Ricklefs, R E., and I. J. Lovette(1999) The roles of island area perse and habitat diversity in the species-area rela-tionship of four Lesser Antillean faunal groups. Joumal of Animal Ecology 68: 1142-1160 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00358.x
  21. Rossi. E., and M. Kuitunen(1996) Ranking of habitat for the assessment of ecological impact in land use planning. Bio-logical Conservation 77: 227-234 https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(95)00139-5
  22. Schonewald-Cox,C.M.(1983)Conclusion:Guideiinestoma-nagement:A begining attenmpt. In リチャ-ド B. プリマッ ク.小堀洋美(1997)保全生物學のすすめ.東京都:文一線 合出版
  23. Tischendorf, L., and L. Fahrig (2000) How should we mea-sure landscape connectivity?. Landscape Ecology 15: 633-641 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008177324187
  24. Triantis, K. A., M. Mylonas, K. Lika, and K. Vardinoyannis (2003) A model for the species-area-habitat relationship. Joumal of Biogeography 30: 19-27 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00805.x
  25. Wilcove, D. S., C. H. McLellan, and A. P. Dobson(1986) Habitat Fragmentation in the Temperate Zone, in Soule, E. M(ed)(1986) Conservation Biology : The Science of Scar-city and Diversity. Sunderland, Massachusetts. Sinauer Associates. Inc
  26. Wu, X. B., and F. E. Smeins (2000) Multiple-scale habitat modeling approach for rare plant conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 51: 11-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00095-5
  27. www.seo.incheon.kr