DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influence of Midsole Hardness of Running Shoes on Shoes Flex Angle during Running

달리기 시 운동화 중저의 경도가 신발굴곡각도의 크기에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2004.08.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine what effects would the midsole hardness of running shoes have on shoe flex angle and maximum propulsive force. Furthermore, the relationship between the shoes flex angle and maximum propulsive force was elucidated in order to provide basic data for developing running shoes to improve sports performances and prevent injuries. The subjects employed in the study were 10 college students majoring in physical education who did not have lower limbs injuries for the last one year and whose running pattern was rearfoot strike pattern of normal foot. The shoes used in this study had 3different hardness, shore A 40(soft), 50(medium) and 60(hard). The subjects were asked to run at a speed of $4{\pm}0.08m/sec$, and their movements were videotaped with 2 S-VHS video-cameras and measured with a force platform. And the following results were obtained after analyzing and comparing the variables. 1. Although the minimum angle of shoes flex angle was estimated to appear at SFA4, it appeared at SFA2 except in those shoes with the hardness of 40. 2. The minimum angle of shoes flex angle was $145.1^{\circ}$ with barefoot. Among the shoes with different hardness, it was the smallest when the hardness was 50 at $149.9^{\circ}$. The time to the minimum angle was 70.7% of the total ground contact time. 3. Maximum propulsive force according to midsole hardness was the largest when the hardness was 50 at $1913.9{\pm}184.3N$. There was a low correlation between maximum propulsive force and shoes flex angle.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽창수, & 이계산(1997). 전족과 후족의 부위별 경도가 후족제어 및 Torsion의 크기에 미치는 영향, 한국체육학회지, 제36권, 제4호, 337-347.
  2. 홍성표(1990). 보행 시 하지 비대칭성의 역학적 분석, 한양대학교 대학원 박사 학위 논문.
  3. Ariel, G. B.(1973). Biomechanics of athletic shoe design, In Biomechanics V-B, P. V. Komi(ed.), Baltimore : University Park Press, 361-367.
  4. Bates, B. T.(1980). Functional evaluation of footwear, Proceedings of Biomechanics Symposium Indiana State Board of Health.
  5. Cavanagh, P. R.(1978). A technique for averaging center of pressure paths from a force platform, J. Biomechanics, 11 : 487-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(78)90060-X
  6. Cavanagh, P. R. & Lafortune, M. A.(1980). Ground reaction forces in distance running, J. Biomechanics, 13 : 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(80)90033-0
  7. Cavanagh, P. R., Andrew, G. C., Kram, R., Rogers, M. M., Sanderson, D. J. & henning, E. M.(1985). An approach to biomechanical profiling of elite distance runner, Int. J. of Sport Biomechanics, 1(1) : 36-63. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsb.1.1.36
  8. Guenther, R.(1967). Ueber stosser schuetterunger beim gang des menschen, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitat Saarbruecken.
  9. Mann, R. A.(1980). Biomechanics of Running, In Symposium on the Foot and Leg in Running Sports, R. P. Mack(ed.), St. Louis : The C. V. Mosby Co., 1-29.
  10. Nigg, B. M.(1986). Biomechanics of Running Shoes, Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics.
  11. Nigg, B. M., Bahlsen, H. A., Denoth, J. & Luethi, S. M.(1986). Factors influencing kinetics and kinematic variables in running, In B. M. Nigg(Ed.), Biomechanics of Running Shoes (1-25), Champaign, IL : Human kinetics.
  12. White, C. A.(1982). The effects of selected running shoes and orthotic devices on ground reaction force parameters, University Oregon, University of Oregon.

Cited by

  1. Influence of Midsole Hardness on Vertical Ground Reaction force and Heel Strike Angle during Men's and Women's Running vol.19, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2009.19.2.379