Effects of Planting Dates on Growth and Yield of Soybean Cultivated in Drained-Paddy Field

  • Cho Jin-Woong (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee Jung-Joon (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim Choong-Soo (College of Agriculture & Life Science, Chungnam National University)
  • Published : 2004.09.01

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine adequate planting date, to compare the growth characteristics between early and late maturing cultivars, and to provide the data for the cultivation techniques of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in double cropping system with winter crops on paddy field in Korea. Cultivars were planted on 26 May, 16 June, and 7 July with a planting density of $70cm(row\;widtb)\;{\times}\;10cm$ (planting spacing). Seed yield of soybean planted on June 16 and July 7 was approximately $37\%\;and\;53\%$, respectively, less than that of conventional planting date of May 26 in Pungsan-namulkong, and planted on June 16 and July 7 was about $30\%\;and\;37\%$, respectively, less then that of conventional planting date of May 26 in Hanamkong. The number of pods and seeds per plant decreased as planting date delayed. Seed weight increased in Pungsan-namulkong but decreased in Hannamkong as planting date delayed. The flowering date was late in delayed planting plots, but it was shorted for days from emergence to flowering and from emergence to maturity. The plant height of Hannamkong was greater than Pungsan-namulkong from the emergence to flowering stages, but in contrast, it was greater in Pungsan-namulkong than Hannamkong after flowering stage (50d after emergence) when it planted on May 26. There were no significant differences between two soybean cultivars at planting dates of June 16 and July 7. Leaf number, leaf area, and dry matter were also reduced by late planting, and Both of them were shown in high reduction at the later planting. There was a high significant difference at the flowering $(r\;=\;0.87^{**})$ and pod formation $(r\;=\;0.91^{**})$ stages between leaf dry matter and seed yield. Crop growth rate (CGR) was greater at $R2\~R3$ growth stages compared to $R3\~R4\;or\;R4\~R5$ growth stages in two soybean cultivars and the greatest CGR was obtained at planting date of May 26 in two soybean cultivars except for R4-R5 growth stage in Pungsan-namulkong. There was a highly significant positive difference between the seed yield and the leaf area index (LAI) across R3 to R4 and R2 to R3 stages. The photosynthetic rate $(P_N)$ of the uppermost leaf position had no significant difference among planting dates and between two soybean cultivars. However, $P_N$ of the $7^{th}$ leaf position increased as the planting date delayed.

Keywords

References

  1. Board, J E and B G. Harville 1996 Growth dynamix during the vegetative period affects yield of narrow-row late-planted soybean. Agron J. 88 : 567-572 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800040012x
  2. Boquet. D J. 1990. Plant population density and row spacing effects on soybean at post-optimal planting dates Agron J 82 59-64 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200010013x
  3. Cho, J. W, C H Kim, and J D. So 2003 Varietal difference of dry matter production and photosynthesis of middle and lower leaves in soybean. Korean J Crop Sci 48 . 25-30
  4. Chu, Y. H., K W. Chung, and M K Joo 1996. Effect of different planting dates on growth and yield component in two ecotypes of soybean Korean J Crop Sci 41 86-94
  5. Chung, K W 1988 Growth and dry matter accomulation in different ecotypes of soybeans (Glycine max. L) Korean J Crop Sci. 33: 174-181
  6. Fehr, W R., C E Caviness, D. T. Burmood, and J S. Pennington. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill Crop Sci 11 929-931 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x
  7. Ford, D. M., R. Shibles, and D. E. Green 1983 Growth and yield of soybean lines selected pod divergent leaf photosynthetic ability Crop Sci. 23 517-520 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300030018x
  8. Hunt, R 1982 Plant growth curves An introduction to the functional approach to plant growth analysis Edward Arnold, London, pp. 14-46
  9. Kokubun, M., H. Mochida, and Y Asahi. 1988. Soybean cultivars difference in leaf photosynthetic rate and its relation to seed yield Jpn, J. Crop Sci 57. 743-748 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.57.743
  10. Kokubun, M. and K Watanabe 1982. Analysis of the yield-dertermining process of field-grown soybeans in relation to canopy structure. VI Characteristics of grain production in relation to plant types as affected by planting patterns and planting densities Japan J Crop Sci 51 . 51-57 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.51.51
  11. Lee, S. C, K. G. Choi,J.H Kim, and Y N Chang 1989 Variation of major characters in soybean varieties Effects of seeding date Korean J. Crop Sci 34: 440-448
  12. Ookawa, T., Y Takase, K Ishihara, and T Hirasawa. 1999 Dry matter production and ecophysiological characteristIcs between soybean cultivars, Enrei and Tachinagaha Jpn. J Crop Sci 68: 105-111 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.68.105
  13. Paker, M B ,W H Marchant, and B. J Mullmex.Jr 1981 Date of planting and row spacing effects on four soybean cultIvars. Agron. J. 73.759-762 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300050003x
  14. Quattara, S and D B. Weaver. 1994 Effect of growth habit on yield and agronomic characteristics of late-planted soybean Crop Sci. 34 . 870-873 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040008x
  15. Sagawa, S. 1998 Varietal difference in photosynthetic rate of midddle and lower leaves and Its relation to seed yield in soybean plants. Jpn. J. Crop Sci 67 221-225 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.67.221
  16. Seong, R C, J Y. Sohn, and S I Shim 2000 Responses of soybean cultivars to excessive moisture Imposed at different growth stages Korean J. Crop Sci 45 282-287
  17. Seung, Y. K., S. H. Lee, Y H Kim, S D Kim, K. W. Chung. and C. S. Moon. 1995. Varietal difference of flowering, maturity and yield in response to planting time in soybean. Korean J Breed 27 . 252-258
  18. Shin, D C., H. S Suh,, and K Y Chang 1992 Studies on limiting time of soybean planting in southern region of Korea I. The effect og different planting times on the variability of characterIstics in soybeans Res Rept RDA. 35 40-46
  19. Shin, D. C ,C K Park, I Y. Baek, I. Y jung, S B Song, H S Suh, and Y. J. Oh 1995 Early maturing, resistant to disease and Iogging, small seed size sprouting soybean variety 'Hannamkong' RDA. J. Agri. Sci 37 139-143
  20. Suh, S. K, H. S Kim, Y J Oh, K H. Kim, S. K Cho, Y J Kim, S D. Kim, H K Park, M. S Park, and S Y Cho. 1997 A new soybean variety for sprout with small seed high yielding 'Pungsan- namulkong' RDA J Sci 39 120-124