Monitoring of Soil Bacterial Community and Some Inoculated Bacteria After Prescribed Fire in Microcosm

  • Song Hong-Gyu (Division of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim Ok-Sun (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Yoo Jae-Jun (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Jeon Sun-Ok (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Hong Sun-Hee (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee Dong-Hun (Division of Life Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn Tae-Seok (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

The soil bacterial community and some inoculated bacteria were monitored to assess the microbial responses to prescribed fire in their microcosm. An acridine orange direct count of the bacteria in the unburned control soil were maintained at a relatively stable level $(2.0\~2.7\times10^9\;cells/g^{-1}{\cdot}soil)$ during the 180 day study period. The number of bacteria in the surface soil was decreased by fire, but was restored after 3 months. Inoculation of some bacteria increased the number of inoculated bacteria sev­eral times and these elevated levels lasted several months. The ratios of eubacteria detected by a flu­orescent in situ hybridization (FISH) method to direct bacterial count were in the range of $60\~80\%$ during the study period, with the exception of some lower values at the beginning, but there were no definite differences between the burned and unburned soils or the inoculated and uninoculated soils. In the unburned control soil, the ratios of $\alpha-,\beta-\;and\;\gamma-subgroups$ of the proteobacteria, Cytophaga-Fla­vobacterium and other eubacteria groups to that of the entire eubacteria were 13.7, 31.7, 17.1, 16.8 and $20.8\%,$ respectively, at time 0. The overall change on the patterns of the ratios of the 5 subgroups of eubacteria in the uninoculated burned and inoculated soils were similar to those of the unburned con­trol soil, with the exception of some minor variations during the initial period. The proportions of each group of eubacteria became similar in the different microcosms after 6 months, which may indicate the recovery of the original soil microbial community structure after fire or the inoculation of some bac­teria. The populations of Azotobacter vinelandii, Bacillus megaterium and Pseudomonas fluorescens, which had been inoculated to enhance the microbial activities, and monitored by FISH method, showed similar changes in the microcosms, and maintained high levels for several months.

Keywords

References

  1. Acea, M. and T. Carballas. 1996. Changes in physiological groups of microorganisms in soil following wildfire. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 20, 33-39
  2. Acea, M., A. Prieto-Fernandez, and N. Diz-Cid. 2003. Cyanobacterial inoculation of heated soils: effect on microorganisms of C and N cycles and on chemical composition in soil surface. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 513-524
  3. Ahn, T., J. Lee, D. Lee, and H. Song. 2002. Ecological monitoring of soil microbial community after forest fire, p. 144-175. In Proceedings of Symposium on Prevention of large forest fire and remediation of ecosystem. Korea Forest Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  4. Alfreider, A., J. Pernthaler, R. Amann, B. Sattler, F. Glöckner, A. Wille, and R. Psenner. 1996. Community analysis of the bacterial assemblages in the winter cover and pelagic layers of a high mountain lake by in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 2138-2144
  5. Amann, R., W. Ludwig, and K. Schleifer. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59, 143-169
  6. Atlas, R. and R. Bartha. 1998. Microbial Ecology: fundamentals and applications. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA
  7. Baath, E., A. Frostegard, T. Pennanen, and H. Fritze. 1995. Microbial community structure and pH response in relation to soil organic matter quality in wood-ash fertilized, clear-cut or burned coniferous forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 229-240
  8. Bashan, Y. 1998. Inoculants of plant growth-promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnol. Adv. 16, 729-770
  9. Belkova, N.L., V.V. Dryukker, S.H. Hong, and T.S. Ahn. 2003. A study of the composition of the aquatic bacterial community of Lake Baikal by the in situ hybridization method. Microbiol. 72, 244-245
  10. Ellis, R.J. 2004. Artificial soil microcosms: a tool for studying microbial autecology under controlled conditions. J. Microbiol. Methods 56, 287-290
  11. Fischer, K., D. Hahn, W. Honerage, F. Schonholzer, and J. Zeyer. 1995. In situ detection of spores and vegetative cells of Bacillus megaterium in soil by whole cell hybridization. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 18, 265-273
  12. Gabos, S., M. Ikonomou, D. Schopflocher, B. Fowler, J. White, E. Prepas, D. Prince, and W. Chen. 2001. Characteristics of PAHs, PCDD/Fs and PCBs in sediment following forest fires in Northern Alberta. Chemosphere. 43, 709-719
  13. Glöckner, F.O., B.M. Fuchs, and R. Amann. 1999. Bacterioplankton compositions of lakes and oceans: a first comparison based on fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 3721-3726
  14. Harris, P., H. Schomberg, P. Banks, and J. Giddens. 1995. Burning, tillage and herbicide effects on the soil microflora in a wheatsoybean double-crop system. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 153-156
  15. Hicks, R., R. Amann, and D. Stahl. 1992. Dual staining of natural bacterioplankton with 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and fluorescent oligonucelotide probes targeting kingdom level 16S rRNA sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 2158-2163
  16. Hobbie, J., R. Daley, and S. Japer. 1977. Use of Nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33, 1225-1228
  17. MacGregor, B. 1999. Molecular approaches to the study of aquatic microbial communities. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10, 220-224
  18. Manz, W., R. Amann, W. Ludwig, and M. Wagner. 1992. Phylogentic oligodeoxynucleotide probes for the major subclasses of Proteobacteria: Problems and solutions. Syst. Appl. Micorbiol. 15, 593-600 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80121-9
  19. Martínez, M., J. Díaz-Ferrero, R. Martí, F. Broto-Puig, L. Comellas, and M. Rodríguez-Larena. 2000. Analysis of dioxin-like compounds in vegetation and soil samples burned in Catalan forest fire. Comparison with the corresponding unburned material. Chemosphere 41, 1927-1935
  20. Neary, D., C. Klopatek, L. DeBano, and P. Ffolliott. 1999. Fire effects on belowground sustainability: a review and synthesis. Forest Ecol. Manage. 122, 51-71
  21. Sharma, G.D. 1981. Effect of fire on soil microorganisms in a Meghalaya pine forest. Folia Microbiol. 26, 321-327
  22. Trebesius, K., R. Amann, W. Ludwig, K. Mühlegger, and K. Schleifer. 1994. Identification of whole fixed bacterial cells with nonradioactive rRNA targeted transcript probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3228-3235
  23. Vázquez, F., M. Acea, and T. Carballas. 1993. Soil microbial populations after wildfire. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 13, 93-104
  24. Walstad, J., S. Radosevich, and D. Sandberg. 1990. Introduction to natural and prescribed fire in Pacific Northwest forests, p. 3-5. In J.D. Walstad, S.R. Radosevich, and D.V. Sandberg (eds.) Natural and Prescribed Fire in Pacific Northwest Forests Oregon State University Press, Corvallis