Analysis on the Importance Degree of Design Checklist for the Elderly Housing Unit

노인공동주거시설 단위주호의 설계지침 중요도 분석

  • Ju Seo Ryeung (Division of Housing and Interior Design, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Cho You Jin (Department of Housing, Child and Family Studies, fyunghee University)
  • 주서령 (경희대학교 생활과학부 주거환경학과) ;
  • 조유진 (경희대학교 대학원 아동주거학과)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

A rapid increase of the elderly population and changes in the social structure, family type and lifestyle bring us to the moment for considering the various aspects of supporting the elderly including the elderly housing facilities. Traditionally it is considered as a merit for a son to support parents in his own house. Hut recently the elderly increasingly want to live independently without support from their children. To satisfy these needs, new housing facilities for the elderly were developed by private non-profit foundations. A number of outstanding housing facilities for the elderly have been built in the last five years. These facilities show significant progress in housing for the elderly. Unfortunately, there u e no standard design checklists or guidelines for housing for the elderly available in Korea. The housing facilities were built based on foreign design guidelines or architect's experience. This research aims to develop an affordable design checklist that can meet the needs of the Korean elderly lifestyle. This study evaluated the senior residential facilities using Woo's checklist which consolidated the guidelines available here and abroad. As the result of this study, we presented the checklist subject in upper group $25\%, middle group, lower group $25\% distribution and 6, 5, 4, categories in order to importance. When designing the future senior residential facilities, a constraint can be made based on the scope and financial factors of the facility first and the determine how extensive the application of the checklist should be.

Keywords

References

  1. 강병근(1996). 노인주거의 설계기준. 건축사 9603(1), 77-81
  2. 김태현. 이인수(1999). 실버산업의 미래. 미래인력 연구센터
  3. 서혜경(1998). 고령화사회의 의의와 의미. 건축42(2), 8-13
  4. 우정민(1999). 생태학적 접근으로 본 노인 주거환경 계획지침에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  5. 이연숙(1993). 노인주택 실내디자인지침. 경춘사
  6. 이지숙. 박정아(2003). 대전시 거주 노인의 욕실 및 통로 공간 디자인에 대한 중요도 평가. 한국 실내디자인학회지, 41(12), 121-128
  7. 이현애(2003). 유료노인 주거시설의 거주환경에 대한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  8. 주거학연구회(2000). 더불어 사는 이웃, 세계의 코 하우징. 서울: 교문사
  9. 주택산업연구원(1998). 고령화계층의 미래주택 선호에 관한 연구
  10. 홍형옥(2001). 영국의 노인공동생활주택에 대한 검토. 한국가정관리학회지, 19(4), 49-68
  11. 홍형옥(2002). 제3의 연령기의 공간환경 연구를 위한 관점과 쟁점-사회 구성주의적 접근을 중심으로. 한국가정관리학회지, 20(6), 37-48
  12. Gilleard(1996). Consumption and Identity in Later Life: toward a cultural gerontology. Ageing and Society, 16(4), 489-498 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X00003640
  13. Heywood, H. Oldman, C. and Means, R.(2002). Housing and Home in Later Life. Buckingham: Open University Press
  14. Myles, J.(1984). Old Age in Welface State. Boston: little Brown
  15. Phillipson, C.(1998). Reconstructing Old Age: New Agendas in Social Theory and Practice. London: Sage
  16. Regnier, V(1987). Housing the Aged. N.Y. : Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc
  17. Tinker, A. (1996) . Older People in Modem Society(4th ed). London: Longman
  18. Walker, A. (1981). Towards a political economy of old age, Ageing and Society, 1(1), 73-94 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X81000056
  19. Wasch, W.K. (1996). Home Planning for your Later Years. Middletown Conn.: Beverly Cracorn Publications