DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Growth and Development in Rye Cultivars Based on the Feekes Scale in Rotation to Sowing Dates

추파용 호밀 품종의 파종기에 따른 Feekes scale에 의한 생장발달 분석

  • Kim, Su-Gon (National Jeju Agricultural Experiment Station, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Duk (National Jeju Agricultural Experiment Station, RDA) ;
  • Kwon, Chan-Ho (National Jeju Agricultural Experiment Station, RDA) ;
  • Park, Hyung-Soo (National Jeju Agricultural Experiment Station, RDA) ;
  • Ko, Han-Jong (Korea National Open University) ;
  • Ha, Jong-Kyu (College of Agric., & Life Sci., Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Am (College of Agric., & Life Sci., Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

This experiment was carried out to assess the growth and development of five rye(Secale cereale L.) cultivars based on the Feekes scale in relation to sowing date at the Experimental Livestock Farm, Seoul National University(SNU), Suwon from 30 September 2001 to 4 May 2002. The experiment was conducted in split plot design with three replications. The main plots consisted of two sowing date such as early(30 September) and late(15 October). The subplots consisted of rye cultivars of five different maturity groups such as 'Kodiak', 'Koolgrazer', 'Danko', 'Homil22' and 'Olhomil'. The plant height of early sowing rye cultivars was higher than that of late one. Among the rye cultivars tested, plant heights of early maturing cultivars were higher than those of the other cultivars. The tiller number at early sowing(48.0) was higher than that of late(24.3), however, late maturing cultivars were higher than those of the other cultivars among the rye cultivars tested. Growth and development in the early sowing were generally three days earlier than those of late sowing cultivars. Growth and development in 'Olhomil' rye cultivars was earlier than 'Danko' rye cultivars when sown in early, but 'Olhomil' and 'Koolgrazer' rye cultivars showed an early maturity than 'Danko' rye when sown in late. Therefore, the developmental stages of winter rye cultivars could be categorised the following maturity; 'Olhomil' and 'Koolgrazer' are early in maturity, 'Homil22' is medium, and 'Kodiak' and 'Danko' are late in maturity.

본 연구는 파종기가 다른 추파호밀의 Feekes scale에 의한 생장발달을 분석하기 위하여 수행하였다. 시험배치는 10처리 3반복의 분할구배치로 주구에는 9월 30일과 10월 15일의 파종시기를, 세구로는 'Kodiak', 'Koolgrager', 'Danko', 'Homil22', 'Olhomil' 품종을 두었다. 초장은 조기파종이 만기파종보다 높았으며, 공시품종간에는 조생품종이 가장 높았다. 분얼경수는 조기파종시에 48.0개로 만기파종시의 24.3개보다 높았으며, 공시품종간에는 만생품종이 다른 품종보다 높게 나타났다. 생장발달 분석에 있어서 조기파종이 만기파종보다 3일 빨랐다. 조기파종시에는 조생품종인 'Olhomil'이 만생품종인 'Danko' 보다 숙기가 빨랐으며, 만기파종시에도 조생품종인 'Olhomil' 및 'Koolgrager'가 빠른 숙기를 보여주었다. 그러므로 시험에서 얻은 결론은 추파용 호밀의 생장과 발달단계를 Feekes scale로 비교한 결과 'Olhomil' 및 'Koolgrazer'는 조생종,'Homil22'는 중생종 그리고 'Kodiak' 및 'Danko'는 만생종으로 분류가 가능했다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김동암, 서 성, 이효원, 허삼남. 1980. 외국산 도입호밀의 청예사료로서의 생산성 비교연구. II. 최종평가시험. 한축지. 22(6):461-469
  2. 김동암, 성경일, 권찬호. 1986. 파종기와 파종량이 사초용 호밀의 생육특성, 월동성 및 건물수량에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 6(3):164-168
  3. 김동암, 권찬호, 한건준. 1992. 청예용 호밀의 수확시기가 사초의 수량과 사료가치에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 12(3):173-177
  4. 김종림, 김동암. 1992. 춘계 파종시기가 조.만생 연맥의 생장, 사초수량 및 품질에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 12(2): 111-122
  5. 鎌田悅男, 懸和一. 達田文武. 1971. 牧草群落における 個體密度が 乾物生産量に及ぽす影響. 草試山地支場硏究資科. No. 10
  6. Anderson, B. 1988. Stand development in winter with different sowing dates. Field Crop Abstr. 41(8):608
  7. Chancellor, R.J. 1966. A note on the definition of cereal growth stages. Weed Res. 6:172-178 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1966.tb00878.x
  8. Donald, C.M. 1963. Competition among crop and pasture plants. Adv. Agron. 5. N. Y. and London
  9. Feekes, W. 1941. De Tarwe en haar milieu. Vers. X VII Tech. Tarwe Comn. Groningen, 560-561
  10. Garwood, E.A. 1969. Seasonal tiller production of grass and grass/clover swards with and without irrigation. J.Br. Grassl. Soc., 24:333-334 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1969.tb01090.x
  11. Haun, J.R. 1973. Visual quantification of wheat development. Agron. J. 65:116-119 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1973.00021962006500010035x
  12. Holmes, W. 1980. Grass, its production and utilization. Blackwell Scientific Pub., London
  13. Jones, M.B. and A. Lazenby. 1988. The grass crop, the physiological basis of production, Chapman and Hall, London
  14. Keller, C. and M. Baggiolini. 1954. Les Stades Reperes dans la Vegetation du Ble. Revue Romande, Lausanne, 10, 17-20. [For other illustration of the Feekes scale]
  15. Kuperman, F.M. 1973. Morfofiziologija rastenij. Moskva
  16. Large E.C. 1954. Growth stages in cereals, illustration of the Feekes' scale. Plant. Pathol. 3:128-129 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1954.tb00716.x
  17. Lermer, J.A. and G. Holzner. 1888. Beitrage zur kenntnis der Gerste. Ed. G. Holzner, Druck von R. Oldenburg, Munchen
  18. Mitchell, K.J. and S.T.J. Coles. 1955. Effect of defoliation and shading on short-rotation ryegrass. N. Z. J. Sci. Technol. Sec. 36(A):586-604
  19. Nowacki, A. 1886. Anleitung zum Getreidebau auf wissenschaftlicher und praktischer Grundlage. Paul Parey Verlag, Berlin, P. 304
  20. Schadlich, F. 1987. Effect of sowing time and sowing rate on stand development, stem stability and yield of winter rye. Field Crop Abstr. 40(6):396
  21. Wiggans, S.C. 1956. The effect of seasonal temperature on maturity of oats planted at different dates. Agron. J. 48:21-25 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1956.00021962004800010006x
  22. Woodford, E.K. and S.A. Evans. 1965. Eds. Weed Control Handbook. 4th Edition. Blackwell Sci entific Publications, Oxford
  23. Zadoks, J.C., T.T. Chang and C.F. Konzak, 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415-421 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x