털개구리미나리(Ranunculus cantoniensis)의 분자계통학적 유연관계 및 종분화

Molecular phylogenetic relationships and speciation of Ranunculus cantoniensis (Ranunculaceae)

  • 이창숙 (이화여자대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 이남숙 (이화여자대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 여성희 (이화여자대학교 사범대학 과학교육학과)
  • 투고 : 2004.11.08
  • 심사 : 2004.12.15
  • 발행 : 2004.12.30

초록

미나리아재비속(Ranunculus)의 털개구리미나리(R. cantonienesis)의 분자계통학적 유연관계를 조사하고 잡종화 가설을 추정하기 위하여, 군외군을 포함한 8분류군의 25개 DNA재료를 대상으로 핵 DNA와 엽록체 DNA의 염기서열을 분석하였다. 털개구리미나리와 근연종에 대하여 maximum parsimony와 maximum likelihood방법으로 분석한 핵 DNA의 ITS 계통수와 psbA-trnH, rps16, trnL 유전자 구간의 염기서열을 조합한 엽록체 DNA 계통수에서, 털개구리미나리는 젓가락나물과 가장 가깝고, 개구리미나리, 왜젓가락나물 순으로 유연관계를 나타내었다. 이러한 분자계통학적 유연관계는 털개구리미나리가 왜젓가락나물과 가장 가깝다는 기존의 외부형태학적 보고와 일치하지 않았다. 염기서열 분석에서 털개구리미나라는 조사된 분류군 중 유일하게 다형성을 나타냄으로서, 염색체수와 핵형에 의하여 보고된 털개구리미나라의 다형성을 지지하였다. 털개구리미나리는 ITS 에서 젓가락나물과 왜젓가락나물의 표지 유전자를 공유하고, 엽록체 DNA에서 왜젓가락나물의 표지 유전자를 공유하였다. 이 결과는 염색체수와 핵형에 의하여 제시되었던 털개구리미나리가 젓가락나물과 왜젓가락나물의 잡종화에 의하여 종분화되었다는 가설을 지지하였으며, 왜젓가락나물이 모계이며, 젓가락나물이 부계로 추정된다.

To investigate molecular phylogenetic relationships and to test hypothesis of hybrid origin of Ranunculus cantoniensis (Ranunculaceae), the sequences of nrDNA and chloroplast DNA were analyzed for 8 taxa and 25 accessions including 5 accessions of outgroup. In the phylogenetic trees by analyses of maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood for ITS nrDNA sequences and combined data of psbA-trnH, rps16 and trnL sequences of cpDNA, R. cantoniensis was most closely related to R. chinensis, and then to R. taciroi and R. silerifolius. The molecular phylogenetic relationships were not congruent with the previous report that R. cantoniensis was most closely related to R. silerifolius. In the sequence analysis of ITS and psbA-trnH, rps16, trnL for R. cantoniensis and the related taxa, R. cantoniensis showed polymorphism. It supported that the polymorphism also was reported in chromosome number and karyotype of R. cantoniensis. Ranunculus cantoniensis shared the marker gene of R. chinensis and R. silerifolius in ITS, and one of R. silerifolius in cpDNA. These results supported the hypothesis that R. cantoniensis was caused by hybridization between R. chinensis and R. silerifolius based on chromosome number and karyotype, and also estimated that R. silerifolius might be of maternal origin and R. chinensis be paternal.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 환경부

참고문헌

  1. Anderea, W. and B. B. Simpson, 2004. Mollecular genetic evidence for interstecific hybridization among endemic Hispaniolan Bursera(Burseraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 91: 976-984 https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.6.976
  2. Baldwin, B. G., M. J. Sanderson, J .M. Porter, M. F. Wojciechowski, C. S. Camoell, and M. J. Donoghue. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82 :247-277 https://doi.org/10.2307/2399880
  3. Doyle, J. J., D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis. 1985. An intergenehc hybrid in the Saxifragaceae: evidence from ribosomal RNA genes. Amer. J. Bot. 72: 1388-1391 https://doi.org/10.2307/2443510
  4. Doyle, J. J. and J. A. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quintities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. Bot. Soc. Amer. 19: 11-15
  5. Downie, S. R. and D. S. Katz-Downie. 1996. A molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 234-251 https://doi.org/10.2307/2445943
  6. -, -, and K. Spalik. 2000. A phylogeny of Apiaceae tribe Scandiceae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 76-95 https://doi.org/10.2307/2656687
  7. Farris, J. S., V. A. Albert, M. Kallersjo, D. Lipscomb and A. G. Kluge. 1996. Parsimony jacknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99-124 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00196.x
  8. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791 https://doi.org/10.2307/2408678
  9. Fujishima, H. 1983. Karyological and biogeographical studies of Ranunculus silerifolius Lev. from Tottori Prefecture. J. Fac. Educ. Tottori Univ., Nat. Sci. 32: 31-37
  10. -. 1985. Cytological studies on to varieties of Ranunculus silerifolius Lev. in Japan. Jap. J. Genet. 60: 215-224 https://doi.org/10.1266/jjg.60.215
  11. - and M. Kurita. 1974. Chromosome studies in Ranunculaceae XXVI. Vahation in karyotype of Ranunculus ternatus var. glaber. Mem. Ehime Univ., Nat. Sci. Ser. B. 7: 62-68
  12. Gibson, T., D. Higgins and J. Thompson. 1994. Clustal X Program. EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany
  13. Goepfert, D. 1974. Karyotypes and DNA content in species of Ranunculus L. and related genera. Bot. Notiser 127: 464-489
  14. Grant, V. 1981. Plant speciation. 2nd. ed. Columbia Univ. Press, New York
  15. Harris, S. A. and R. Ingram. 1991. Chloroplast DNA and biosystematics: the effects of intraspecific diversity and plastid transmission. Taxon 40: https://doi.org/10.2307/1223218
  16. Kang, S-H. and S. J. Yang. 2001. Intraspecific genetic vahation of ITS regions between two karyotypes in Ranunculus cantoniensis (Ranunculus). Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 31: 57-68
  17. Kurita, M. 1955. Cytological studies in Ranunculaceae I. The karyotype analysis in the genus Ranunculus. Bot. Mag. 66: 94-97
  18. -, 1957a. Chromosome studies in Ranunculaceae. Karyotypes of the subtribe Ranunculiae. Rep. Biol. Inst. Ehime Univ. 2: 1-8
  19. -. 1957b. Chromosome studies in Ranunculaceae. Karyotypes of Eranthis and some other genera. Mem. Ehime Univ., Nat. Sci. Ser. B. 2: 325-334
  20. Lawrence, A. A. and C. S. Campbell. 1999. Phylogeny of Rubus (Rosaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA intemal transcribed spacer region sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 81-97 https://doi.org/10.2307/2656957
  21. _, T. Eriksson, B. Eriksen and C. S. Campbell. 2001. Hybridization and gene flow between distantly related species of Rubus (Rosaceae): Evidence from Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Intemal Transcribed Spacer Region Sequences. Syst. Bot. 26:769-778
  22. Okada, H. 1981. On sexual isolation caused by karyotype vanatins in Ranunculus silerifolius Lev. J. Jap. Bot. 56: 41-49
  23. -. 1984. Polyphyletic Allopolyploid Origin of Ranunculus cantoniensis (4x) from R. silerifolius (2x) x R. chinensis (2x). Pl. Syst. Evol. 148: 89-102 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984571
  24. -. 1989. Cytogenetical changes of offsprings from the induced tetraploid hybhd between Ranunculus silerifotius (2n=16) and R. chinertsis (2n=16) (Ranunculaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 167: 129-136 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936401
  25. - and M. Tamura. 1977. Chromosome variations in Ranunculus quelpaertensis and its allied species. J. Jap. Bot. 52: 360-369
  26. Oxelamn, B., M. Liden and D. Berglund. 1997. Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae(Caryophyllaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 206: 393-410 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987959
  27. Rieseberg, L. H. and D. E. Soltis. 1991. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol. Trends Pl. 5: 65-84
  28. Saitou, N. and M. Nei. 1987. The Neighbour-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molec. Biol. Evol. 4:
  29. Sang, T., J. Crawford, and T. F. Stuessy. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 84:1120-1136 https://doi.org/10.2307/2446155
  30. Stebbins, G. L. 1984. Polyploid and the distribution of the arctic-alpine flora: new evidence and a new approach. Bot. Helv. 94:1-13
  31. Swofford, D. L. 2002. $PAUP\ast.$ Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony $(\ast and\,other\,methods).$ Version 4.01b10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. MA, USA
  32. Taberlet, P., L. Gielly, G. Pautou, and J. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 105-1109
  33. Takahashi, C. 2003. Physical mapping of rDNA sequences in four karyotypes of Ranunculus silerifolius (Ranunculaceae). J. Plant Res. 116: 331-336 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-003-0104-8
  34. Tamura, M. 1978. Nelalese specimens of Ranunculus and its allied genera preserved in British Museum (Natural History). Sci. Rep. Osaka Univ. 27: 99-117
  35. Wallander E. and V. A. Albert. 2000. Phylogeny and classification of Oleaceae based on rps16 and trnL-F sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1827 -1841 https://doi.org/10.2307/2656836
  36. 여성희. 1985. 한국산 미나리아재속(Ranunculus)식물의 계통분류학적 연구. 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문
  37. 이영노. 1996. . 교학사. 서울