대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제42권6호
  • /
  • Pages.671-678
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

BONE RESPONSE OF THREE DIFFERENT SURFACE IMPLANTS: HISTOMORPHOMETRIC AND RESONANCE FREQUENCY ANALYSIS IN DOGS

  • Song Woo-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Yung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jang Kyung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem. Reducing treatment time in implant dentistry is a matter of main concern. There are so many factors affecting the success rate of immediate or early loaded implant for the initial bone response. The especially microscopic properties of implant surfaces playa major role in the osseous healing of dental implant. Purpose. The aims of this study were to perform a histologic and histomorphometric comparison of the healing characteristics anodically roughened surface, HA coated surface and RBM surface implant, and to compare of ISQ values measured by $Osstell^{TM}$ for resonance frequency analysis in dogs mandible during 2 weeks. Material and method. Bone blocks from 2 dogs were caught after covered healing for 0 day(2 h); Group I, 1 week; Group II and 2 weeks; Group III. One longitudinal section was obtained for each implant and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Histomorphometric analysis was done with Kappa Imagebase system to calculate bone-to-implant contact and bone volumes inside the threads. ISQ values were measured in every time of surgery schedule. Conclusion. The experiment revealed that: 1. The percentages of bone-to-implant contact on the fixture in each group were not significantly different(P > 0.05). 2. The percentages of bone area inside the threads on the fixture in each group were not significantly different(P > 0.05). 3. The ISQ level showed clinical stability of each fixture during 2 weeks(all ISQ level ${\geq}71$ ).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Pros Dent 1983;50:399 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  2. Branemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand Reconstr Surg 1977;11(suppI16)
  3. Roos J, Sennerby L, Albrektsson T. An update on the clinical documentation on currently used bone-anchored endosseous Implants. Dent Update 1997;24:194-200
  4. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxfacial Impl 1986 I:11-25
  5. Davies JE et al. The bone-titanium interface in vitro. J Biomedical Materials Research 1990;24;1289-1306
  6. Hazan R et al. Bone growth to metal implants is regulated by their surface chemical properties. Biomaterials 1993;14:570-574 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(93)90172-X
  7. Weinlaender M et al. Histomorphometry of bone apposition around three types dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofacial ImpI 1992;7:491-496
  8. Ericsson I, Johansson CB et al. A histomorphometric evaluation of implant contact on machined-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:2002-206
  9. Larsson C, Thomsen P. et al. Bone response to surface modified Ti implants : studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 1996:17(6):605-615
  10. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong YS, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002:13:252-259
  11. Meredith N, Alleybe D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:261-267 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  12. Donath K. Die Trenn-D$\"{u}$nnschliff-Technik zur Herstellung histologischer Pr$\"{a}$paraten von nichit schneidbaren Geweben und Materialien. Der Pr$\"{a}$parator 1988;34:197-206.
  13. Boyan BD, Hummert T, Kieswetter K. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and carilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996:17:137-146
  14. Kim YS. 3-D finite element study on surface characteristics and stress of implants. SNUDH Dept of Pros. Unpublished
  15. Simunnek A. Evaluation of stability of titanium and hydroxyappatite coated osseointegrated dental implants: a pilot study Clin Oral Impl Res 13, 2002;75-79 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130109.x
  16. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20 month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:297-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80163-5
  17. Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseo-integrated implants. A review of the literature. Int J Pros 1998; 11:408-420
  18. Sennerby L, Roos J. RFA: Measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compendium 1998:19;493-502
  19. Sennerby L, Friberg B, Linden B, Jemt T, Meredith N. Acomparison of implant stability in mandibular and maxillary bone using RFA. European Commission Demonstration Project. RFA Symposium. 2000 Sweden
  20. CJ Park. A study on the change of implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. J Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2003;41:271-287
  21. Albrektsson T et al. Histologic investigations on 33 retrieved Nobelpharma implants. Clin Materials 1993;12:1-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(93)90021-X
  22. Rocci A et al. Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: Light mocroscopic observations after 5-9 months of loading in the osterior mandible. Clin Impl Dent Related Res 2003;5(1):88-97 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00020.x
  23. Berglundh T et al. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants: A model study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:251-262 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x
  24. Botticelli D et al. Appositional bone formation in marginal defects at implants: A experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003:14; 1-9
  25. Zechner W. et al. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types: A histologic and histomorphometric study in mini-pigs. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14: 150-157 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140203.x
  26. YH Kim, JY Koak, IT Chang, SJ Heo. A histomorphometric analysis of the effect of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Impl 2003;18(3):349-356
  27. Albrektsson T et al. Bone metal interface in osseointegration. J Pros Dent 1987; 57:597-607 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90344-1
  28. Collier JP et al. Macroscopic and microscopic evidence of prosthetic fixation with porous coated materials. Clin Orthop 1988;235:173-180
  29. Pilliar RM. Porous-surfaceed metallic implants for orthopedic applications. J Biomed Material Res 1987;21:1-33 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820210106
  30. Sun L. Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings. A review J Biomed Materials Res 2001:58: 570-592
  31. Tal H. Spontaneous early exposure of submerged implants. II. Histopathology and histomorphometry of non-perforated mucosa covering submerged implants. J PeriodontoI 2000:71:1231-1235