대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제42권1호
  • /
  • Pages.30-40
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

레진 시멘트와 상아질접착제를 사용한 콤포지트 레진 코아의 전단결합강도에 관한 연구

SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE RESIN CORE USED IN COMBINATION WITH VARIOUS RESIN CEMENTS AND DENTIN BONDING AGENTS

  • 김현오 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 방몽숙 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Kim Hyun-O (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Vang Mong-Sook (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.02.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose : The purpose of this study was aimed to compare the shear bond strength on dentin of three dentin bonding agents and two resin cements used in conjunction with self-cured composite resin core material. Material and method : Control group and six experimental groups were divided for this study. Control group was designated as specimens bonded with Tenure$ A&B^{(R)}$. Experimental groups were as follows : PB-BL group : specimens bonded with Prime&Bond $NT^{(R)}$, $BondLink^{(R)}$ SB-BL group : specimens bonded with $^{(R)}$, BondLink$SingleBond^{(R)}$ PB group : specimens bonded with Prime&Bond $NT^{(R)}$ SB group : specimens bonded with $SingleBond^{(R)}$ PF group : specimens bonded with $Panavia-F^{(R)}$ BI group specimens bonded with Bistite $II^{(R)}$ All specimens were stored in $37^{\circ}C$ distilled water for 24 hours, followed by the shear bond strength was tested by universal testing machine. The data was analysed statistically by Mann-Whitney test. Results : 1. For Prime&Bond $NT^{(R)}$ and $SingleBonde^{(R)}$, the shear bond strength was 0.24 MPa and 7.19 MPa each by each, while Tenure $A&B^{(R)}$ group control was measured at 13.93 MPa (p<0.05). Especially for Prime&Bond $NT^{(R)}$ it did not get conjunction with dentin. 2. For Prime&Bond $NT^{(R)}$ and $SingleBond^{(R)}$ using $BondLink^{(R)}$, there was no significant difference as a result of 11.73 MPa and 14.00 MPa each by each (p<0.05). 3. For $Panavia-F^{(R)}$ and Bistite $II^{(R)}$, they showed the highest shear bond strength as measured by 18.24 MPa and 16.09 MPa each (p<0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Shillingburg HT. Kessler JC. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Chicago : Quientessence Pub Co 1982:13-44
  2. Stern N. Hirshfeld Z. Principles of preparing endodontically treated tooth for dowel and core restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1973: 30: 162-3
  3. Sapone J. Lorencki SF. An endodontic prosthodontic approach t internal tooth reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1981:45:164-74
  4. Sturdevent CM, Sockwell CL, Barton RE, Strickland WD. The art and science of operative dentistry. Mosby Co., St. Louis 1985:2: 273
  5. Kwon GW, Park SJ , Min BS et al. Scanning electron microscopic study on resin infiltrations after dentin treatments. J of Kor Aca of Conservative Dentistry 1993:18:38-53
  6. Donadl GM, Orson DW. Mercury toxicity in the dental office. J Am Dent Assoc 1976:92:1189-1194
  7. Leonard DP, ElIse MC. The silent hazard : An unusual case of mercury contamination of a dental suite. J Am Dent Assoc 1976:92:1195-1198
  8. Vrijhoff MMA. Letzel H. Creep versus marginal fracture of amalgam restorations. J Oral Rehabili 1986:13:299-303
  9. Osborne JW, Friedman SJ. Clinical evaluation of marginal fracture amalgam restoration, J Prosthet Dent 1986:55:335
  10. Habu H, Ohta K, Tanabe N, Hiraguchi H. Amalgam corrosion determined by dissolution of component elements and microstructural changes. Dent Mater J 1986:5:26-36
  11. Moberg LE, Oden A. Long term corrosion studies in vitro of amalgams in contact, Acta Odontol Scand 1985:43: 205-213
  12. Warren JA Jr. Soderholm KJ. Bonding amalgam to glass ionomer with PPA. Dent Mater 1988:4:191-196
  13. Osborne JW, Gale EN, Ferguson GW. One-year and two-year clinical evaluation of a composite resin vs. amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1973:30:795-800
  14. Eames WB, Weitman RT, Williams AK. Clinical comparison of composite, amalgam, and silicate restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1974:89:1111-1117
  15. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjoer IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990:48:297
  16. Jokstad A. Mjoer IA. Analysis of long-term clinical behavior of class-II amalgam restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1991: 49:47
  17. Nelson GV, Osborne JW, Gale EN et al. A three year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth. J Dent for Children 1980:47:414
  18. Hendriks FHJ, Letzel H, Vrijhoef MMA. Composite versus amalgam restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1986:13:401
  19. Linde LA. The use of composites as core material in root-filled teeth. Swed Dent J 1983: 7: 205-14
  20. Landwerlen JR. Berry HH. The composite resin post and core. J Prosthet Dent 1972:28:500-503
  21. Oliva RA. Lowe JA. Dimensional stability of composites used as a core material. J Prosthet Dent 1986:56:554-561
  22. Stahl GJ. O' Neal RB. The composite resin crown and core. <1> J Prosthet Dent 1974:33:642-648
  23. Craig RG. Direct esthetic restorative materials. Restorative Dental Materials 1997: 10:244-280
  24. Seltzer S. The penetration of micro-organism between the tooth and direct resin fillings. J Am Dent Assoc 1955:51:560-566
  25. Philips RW. Skinner's Science of Dental Materials. 8th ed Philadelpia WB Saunders Co 1982:58
  26. GW Reeves. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth. Oper Dent 1995:20:230-235
  27. Philips RW. Bond strength and microleakage with dentin bond systems. Oper Dent 1990:15: 53-60
  28. Prati C. Pashley DH. Montanari G. Hydrostatic intrapulpal pressure and bond stength of bonding systems. Dent Mater 1991:7: 54-58
  29. Pashley EL. Taiman R. Homer JA Pashley DH. Permeability of normal versus carious dentin. Endodont Dent Traumatol 1991:7:207-211
  30. Perinka L. Sano H. Dentin thickness. hardness and $Ca{2+}$ concentration vs.bond strength of dentin adhesive. Dent Mater 1993:8:229-233
  31. Elkins CJ. McCourt JW. Bond stength of dentinal adhesives in primary teeth. Quint Int 1993:24:271-273
  32. Miyazaki M. Dentin bonding system. Part I : Literature review. Bio-Med Mater and Eng 1996:6(1):15-31
  33. Freedman G. Fifth generation bonding systems. Canadian Dent Assoc 1997:63(6):439-443
  34. Setcos JC. Dentin bonding in perspective. Am J Dent 1988:1:173-175
  35. Hagge MS. Lindemuth JS. Shear bond strength of an autopolymerizing core build up composite bonded to dentin with 9 dentin adhesive systems. J.Prosthet Dent 2001:86(6):620-3
  36. O. Keefe KL. Powers JM. Adhesion of resin composite core materials to dentin. Int J Prosthodont 2001:14:451-456
  37. Gregory WA. Griffths L. Irwin G. Effects of intracore material interlocks and cement type on full crown retention. Am J Dent 1991:4:29-32
  38. Stenfort J. Deblauwe BM. Beertsen W. The inorganic components of cementum and enamel related dentin in the rat incisor. J Dent Res 1990:69:1287-1292
  39. Gwinnett AJ. The morphologic relationship between dental resins and etched dentin. J Dent Res 1977:56:1155-1160
  40. Pashley DH. Michelich V. Kehl T. Dentin permeability: effects of smear layer removal. J Prosthet Dent 1981:46:531-537
  41. Baire RE. Principle of adhesion. Oper Dent supplement 1992:5:1-9
  42. Erickson RL. Surface interaction of dentin adhesive materials. Oper Dent supplement 1992:5:81-94
  43. Gerzina TM. Hume WR. Effect of hydrostatic pressure on the diffusion of monomers through dentin in vitro. J Dent Res 1995: 74:369-373
  44. Nakabayashi N. Nakamura M. Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a Dentin-Bonding Mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991:123:35-43
  45. Kanca JK. Improving bond strength through acid etching of dentin and bond ing to wet dentin surfaces. JADA 1992:123:35-43
  46. Nakabayashi. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Bio-med Mater Res 1982:16:265-273
  47. Clinical Research Associates. Core buildup & adhesive incompatibility. CRA News letter 2000:24:1-2
  48. Staninec M, Giles WS, Saiku JM, Hattori M. Caries penetration and cement thickness of three luting agents. lnt J Prostodont 1988:1:259-263
  49. Shillingburg H. Hobo S. Fundermentals of fixed prosthodontics. Quintenssence Pub Co 1981:378
  50. Dennison JD, Powers JM. A review of dental cements used for permanent retention of restoration Part 2: Properties and criteria for selscion. Mich Dent Am J 1974:56:218
  51. Tjan AHL. Dunn JR. Grant BE. Marginal leakage of cast crowns luted with an adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:11-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90039-D