The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

EFFECT OF IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE ON THE ACCURACY OF MASTER CAST FOR IMPLANT PROSTHESIS

인상채득방법이 임플란트 주모형의 정확성에 미치는 영향

  • Kim Young-Oh (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yang Hong-So (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 김영오 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 양홍서 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 2004.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem: Major objective in making on implant-supported prosthesis is the production of superstructure that exhibits a passive fit when connected to multiple abutments. One requirement to ensure passive fit is to make an accurate impression. Purpose : The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of master cast fabricated by using different impression methods at the different impression levels. Material and method: The master model used in this study was resin block having low implant analogs. Impression method studied were 1) direct method on fxiture level (Group FIX-D), 2) indirect method on fixture level(Group FIX-I), 3) modified indirect method on fixture level(Group FIX-M), 4) direct method on abutment level(Group AB-D) and 5) indirect method on abutment level(Group AB-I). Each of the five groups took 10 impressions. Fifty impressions were made for master cast by using Impregum $F^{(R)}$ impression material loaded on individual tray. Three dimensional measuring microscope was used to measure the inter-implant distance. Error rate of each inter-implant distance were calculated and evaluated. Results : The results were as follows. 1. Group FIX exhibited higher accuracy than group AB. 2. In group FIX, modified indirect method showed the highest accuracy, while indirect method showed the lowest accuracy. In group Ab, indirect method showed the higher accuracy than direct method. 3. Group FIX showed larger horizontal error than group AB. But, group AB showed the larger vertical error than group FIX. 4. Group Fix-M showed smallest vertical and horizontal error. Conclusion: An impression method have more effect on accuracy of master model than an impression level. A modified indirect method showed smallest vertical and horizontal error.

Keywords

References

  1. Adell R. Lekholm D, Rockler B. Bransmark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981: 10:387-416
  2. Han ET. Kim YS. Kim CW, A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant impression techniques by using strain gauge. J Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 1995:33:539
  3. Burguete RL. Johns RB. King T. Patterson EA. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1994: 71: 592-9
  4. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. Mosby Year Book. Inc. St. Louis 1993
  5. Zarb GA. Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Tronto study. Part III : Problem and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990:64: 185
  6. Humphries RM. Yaman P. Bleom TJ. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990:5:331-6
  7. Rangert B. Jemt T. Jorneus L. Forces and movements on Branomark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990:4:241-7
  8. Bransmark PI. Zarb GA. Albrektsson T. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, Quintessence Publ Co 1985: 117-28
  9. Branarnark PI. Zarb GA. Albreksson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses. Quintessence publish Company 1990:233-40
  10. Sones AD. Complications with osseointegrated implants. J. Prosthet Dent 1989:62:581-5
  11. Barrett MG. de Rijk WG. Burgess JO. The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthodont 1993: 2: 75-82
  12. Assif D. Marshak B. Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996:11:216-22
  13. Carr AB. A comparison of impression techniques for a five implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991 :6:448-55
  14. Assif D. Fenton A. Zarb G. Schmitt A. Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992: 12: 113-21
  15. Phillips KM. Nicholls JI, Ma T. Rubenstein J. The accuracy of three implant impression technique: A three-dimensional onal analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implant 1994:9:533-40
  16. Rodney J. Johansens R. Harris W. Dimensional accuracy of two implant impression copings. J Dent Res 1991:70: 385
  17. Misch CE, Density of bone: effect on treatment plans. surgical approach. healing, and progressive loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995: 10: 303-11
  18. Worthington P. Bolendef CL. Taylar TD. The Swedish system of osseo-integrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987:77-84
  19. Sellers GC. Direct assembly framework for osseointegrated implant prosthesis. J. Prosthet Dent 1989 :62: 662-8
  20. Clelland NL. Carr AB. Gilat A. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant between as-cast and post-soldered implant frameworks for a five-implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthodont 1996:5(3): 193-200
  21. Jemt T. In vivo measurements of precision fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996:11:151-8
  22. Henry PJ. An alternative method for the production of accurate casts and occlusal records in osseointegrated implant rehabilitation. J Prosthet Dent 1987:58:694-7
  23. Tautin FS. Impression making for osseointegrated denture. J Prosthet Dent 1985:54:250-1
  24. Liou AD. Nicholls JI, Yuodelils R, Brudvik JS. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression material. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1993:6:377-83
  25. Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000: 83: 323-31
  26. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. St Louis. CV Mosby Co. 1989:293-346
  27. Spector M. Donovan TE. Nicholls JI. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990:63:444-7
  28. Carr AB. Master J. The accuracy of implant verification casts compared with casts produced from a rigid transfer coping technique. J Prosthet Dent 1996:5:248-52
  29. Lorenxoni M. Pertl C. Penkner K. Polansky R, Sedaj B. Wegscheider WA. Comparisonof the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2000:27:629-38