Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Comparision of Osseointegration Depending on Surface Treatment

임플란트 표면처리에 따른 골융합의 차이

  • 황하준 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 박준봉 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 권영혁 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 허익 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2004.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present study was performed to evaluate histomorphological difference in various surface-treated implants in beagle. Implants($Implantium^{(R)}$, Dentium Co. Korea) with pure titanium machined surface, acid treated surface, and $Al_2O_3(50{\sim}100\;{\mu}m)$blasted with acid treated surface were used in this study. All mandibular premolars of $1.5{\sim}2$ year old male beagle dogs were extracted. At 3 months after extraction, the implants(${\Phi}$ 4mm, l 6mm) were installed. The beagle were sacrificed at 1, 3 months after installation and then tissues including implants were prepared for non-decalcified specimens. These specimens were analyzed comparatively under light microscope. The results of this study were as follow 1. Higher rate of osseointegration were showed in the $Al_2O_3(50{\sim}100\;{\mu}m)$blasted with acid-treated surface. 2. Increased osseointegration were showed in the $Al_2O_3(50{\sim}100\;{\mu}m)$blasted with acidtreated surface with time. 3. Higher maturation of integration were showed in the $Al_2O_3(50{\sim}100\;{\mu}m)$blasted with acid-treated surface. In conclusion, surface treatment of $Al_2O_3blasted$ with acid might be considered to shorten healing time and improve success rate as increasing contact of implant and bone.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark, P.I., Hansson, B.O., Adell, R., Breine, D., Lindstrom, J., Hallen, O. and Ohman, A. : Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-years period. Scand. J. Plast. Recontr. Surg., 11(suppl, 16): 1-132, 1977
  2. Harris LM : An artificial wonders. Oral Implant., 16: 57-63, 1990
  3. Stock AE : Experimental work on dental implantation in the alvelous. Am J Orthod Oral Surg., 25: 5, 1939
  4. Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B., and Branemark, P.I. : A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Int. J. Oral Surg., 10: 387-416, 1981
  5. Zarb, G.A., and Schmitt, A. : The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated den- tal implants. The Toronto study: part I, surgical results. J. Prosthet. Dent., 63: 451-457, 1990
  6. Ericsson, I., Lekholm, U., Branemark, P.I., Lindhe, J., Glantz, P.O., and Nyman, S. : A clinical evaluation of fixed bridge restora- tions supported by the combination of tooth and osseointegrated titanium implants. J. Clin. Periodontol., 13: 307-312, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb02227.x
  7. Meffert. R.M., Langer, B., and Fritz, M.E. : Dental Implants : A Review. J. Periodontol., 63: 859-870, 1992
  8. Albreksson, T., Zarb, G.A., Worthinton, P., and Ericsson, R.A. : The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants : A review and prognosis criteria for success, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants., 1: 11-25, 1986
  9. Albreksson, T., Dahl, E., and Enbom, L. : Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8,139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J. Periodon- tol., 59: 287-296, 1988
  10. Cochran DL : A comparison of endosseous dental implant surafces J. Periodontol 70 : 1523-1539, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.12.1523
  11. Albrectson T, Zarb G, Worthington D, Erickson RA : The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants. Int J oral Maxillofac Implants 1 : 11-25, 1986
  12. Hobo, S., Ichida, E., and Garcia, L. T. : Osseointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation. Quintessence Co. pp21-32. 1989
  13. Branemark, P-I, Zarb, G. A., Albreksson, T. : Tissue integrated prosthesis. osseointe- gration in clinical dentistry. Chicago:Quin- tessence Publishing Co., Inc., 1985
  14. Gottlander, M., and Albrektsson, T. : His-tomorphometric studies of hydroxylapatite- coated and uncoated CP titanium threaded implants in bone. Int. J. Oral, Maxillofac. Implants., 6; 399-404, 1991
  15. Gottlander, M., and Albrektsson, T. : A Histomorphometric study of unthreaded hydroxyapatite coated and titanium coated implants in rabbit bone. Int. J. Oral. Max- illofac. Implants., 7:485-490, 1992
  16. Denissen, H. W., Kalk, W., Nieuport H. M., Maltha, J. C., and Hoofe, A. : Mandibular bone response to plasma-sprayed coatings of hydroxyapatite. Int. J. Prosthodont., 3:53-58, 1990
  17. Oonishi, H. Yamamoto, M., Ishimura, H. Tsuji, E., Kushitani S., Aono, M., and Ukon, Y : The Effect of Hydroxyapatite coating on Bone Growth into porous titanium alloy implants. J. Bone. Joint. Surg., 71-B:213-216, 1989
  18. Wennerberg, A., Ektessabi, A., Albrektsson, T., Johansson, C., and Andersson, B. : A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int. J. Oral.. Maxillofac. Implant., 12;486-494, 1997
  19. Albreksson, T., Branernark, P.I., Hansson, H.A., and Lindstrom, J. : Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta. Orthop, Scand., 52: 155-170, 1981
  20. Jaffin, R.A., and Berman, C.L.: The excessive loss of Figure fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J. Per-iodontol., 62: 2-4, 1991
  21. Jemt, T. : Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaw. A three-year follow- up study in 70 patients. Clin. Oral Impl, Res., 4: 187-194, 1993
  22. Jemt, T., Chai, J., Harnett, J., Heath, M.R., Hutton, J.E., Johns, R.B., McKenna, S., McNamara, D.C., van Steenberghe, D., Taylor, R., Watson, R.M., and Hermann, I. : A 5-year prospective multi- center follow- up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int. J. Oral Max- illofac. Implants., 11: 291-298, 1996
  23. Schroeder, A., Pohler, O., and Sutter, F. : Gewebereaktion auf ein Titan-Hohlzylin- derimplatat mit Titan-Spritzschichtoberfl$"{a}$che, Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd, 86: 713-727, 1976
  24. Babbush, C.A., Kent, J.N., and Misiek, D.J. : Titanium plasma-sprayed(TPS) screw im- plants for the reconstruction of the edentul- ous mandible. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 44: 274-282, 1986
  25. Scacchi, M., Merz, B.R., and Schar, A.R. : The development of the $ITI^{\circledR}$ DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM. Part 2: 1998-2000: Steps into the next millenium. Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 11(Suppl.): 22-32, 2000
  26. Brunette, D.M. : The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells., Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. implants., 3: 231-246, 1988
  27. Albrektsson, T. and Sennerby, L. : The state of the art in implants. J. Clin. Periodontol., 18: 474-484, 1991
  28. Branemark, P.I. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous iaw: experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg., 16: 95-102, 1992
  29. Kishi Y, Matsuo M, Kirigaya M, Ooohara K, Terauchi Y, Tou K, Takahashi K: Regenera- tion of gingival microvascular architecture on the interface of endosseous titanium implants., Jpn J Oral Biol, 37: 162-166, 1995
  30. Buser D, Shenk RK, Steinemann S : Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants A histomorphometric study in mininature pigs. J Biomed Maer Res., 25:889, 1991
  31. Michaels CM, Keller JC, Stanford CM, Solursh M : In vitro cell attachment of osteoblast-like cells to titanium. J Dent Res., 68: 276, 1988
  32. Cochran D, Numminkoshi P, Higinbottom F, Hermann J, Makins S, Buser P. Evaluation of endoosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible : radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res., 7: 240-252, 1996
  33. Bowers KT, Keller J, Randoph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM. : Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maillofac Im- plants., 7: 302-310, 1992
  34. Keller JC, Stanford CM, Wightman JP, Draughn RA, Zaharias R.: Characterization of titanium implant surface III. J Biomed Maer Res., 22: 145-158, 1988
  35. Cooper, L.F., Masuda, T., Whitson, S.W., Yliheikkila, P. and Felton, D.A. : Formation of mineralizing osteoblast cultures on mac- hined, titanium oxide grit-blasted and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants., 14:37-47, 1999
  36. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Lankford Jr J, Dean DD, Cochran DL, Boyan BD : Effect of titanium surface roughmess on proliferation, differentitation, and protein synthesis of human oseteoblst-like cell(MG63). J Biomed Mater Res., 29: 389-401, 1995
  37. Predecki P, Stephan JE, Auslaender BA, Mooney VL, Kirkand K : Kinetics of bone growth into cylindrical chnnels in aluminum oxide and titanium. J Biomed Mater Res., 6: 375-400, 1972
  38. Thomas KA, Cook S : An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res., 19: 875-901, 1985
  39. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Kroll JJ : A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res., 8: 622-633, 1998
  40. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A : Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface : A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res., 8: 442-447, 1997
  41. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hilt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP : Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs : Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants., 13: 611-619, 1998