Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Analysis of surface form change after performing prophylaxis procedure on implant surface using various oral hygiene instruments

다양한 구강위생기구를 이용하여 임플란트 표면의 Prophylaxis 시행시 표면형태의 변화분석

  • Lee, Sun-Goo (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University) ;
  • Lim, Sung-Bin (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University) ;
  • Chung, Chin-Hyung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University) ;
  • Kwon, Sang-Ho (Biomaterial Research Institute, Neobiotech)
  • 이선구 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 임성빈 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정진형 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 권상호 (네오바이오텍 생체재료연구소)
  • Published : 2004.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is improtant that performing prophylaxis procedure on an infected implant surface in order to treat peri-implantitis should not change the surface roughness and composition, so that the surface can be recovered to almost same condition as initial implant surface. This thesis, therefore, studied an effect of various oral hygiene instrument on implant surface. A surface roughness measurement instrument and an infection electron microscope were used to observe a change on surface. The purpose of this study was to obtain a clinical guidelines during implant care and peri-implantitis treatment. The result were as follows 1. Ra values (surface roughness value) at experimental group 1, group 2, and group 5 were increased significantly as compared with comparison group(p<0.05). 2. When compared experimental group 1 with each experimental groups at which prohylaxis procedure was performed, mean values of Ra at experimental group 2, group 3, group 6, and group 7 were decreased significantly(p<0.05). 3. Mean value of Ra was lowest at experimental group 2, and highest at experimental group 2, and highest at experimental group 5. 4. Analysis of SEM showed that was significant surface change at experimental group 2, group 3, group 4, group 5, and group 6 as compared with comparison group(X1000). 5. Analysis fo EDX showed that a quantity of Ti on surface for experimental group 6 was very similar to that for comparison group. In conclusion, air-powder abrasive and citric acid, plastic instrument are safe methods to use for performing prophylaxis procedure on implant care or for cleaning and sterilization process on treatment of peri-implantitis, based on the result that those method did not affect implant surface roughness and Ti composition.

Keywords

References

  1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B and Branemark PI: A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg, 1981, 10: 387-416
  2. Zarb GA and Schmitt A: The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study: part I, surgical results. J Prosthet Dent, 1990, 63: 451-457
  3. Ericsson I, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Lindhe J, Glantz PO and Nyman S: A clinical evaluation of fixed bridge restorations supported by the combination of tooth and osseointegrated titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol, 1986, 13: 307-312 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb02227.x
  4. Meffert RM, Langer B and Fritz ME: Dental implant: A review. J Periodontol, 1992, 63: 859-870
  5. Babbush CA: Surgical atlas of implant techniques. Philadelphia. WB Saunders Co., 1980
  6. d'Hoedt B and Schulte W: A comparative study of results with various endosseous implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1989, 4: 95-105
  7. Mickinney RV Jr: Endosteal dental implant, Mosby-Year book, 1991
  8. Finger IM and Guerra IR: Prosthetic considerations in reconstructive implantology. Dent North Am, 1986, 30: 69-83
  9. Albreksson T, Dahl E and Enbom L: Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8,139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol, 1988, 59: 287-296
  10. Leckholm U, Ericsson I, Adell R and Slots J: The conditions of the soft tissues at tooth and fixture abutments supporting fixed bridge. A microbiological and histological study. J Clin Periodontol, 1986, 13: 558-562
  11. Hobo S, Ichida E and Garcia LT: Osseointegration and occlusal rehabilitation. Quintessence Publishing Co., 1989
  12. Albreksson T, Zarb G, Worthinton P and Eriksson RA: The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and prognosis criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1986, 1: 11-25
  13. Lavelle CL: Mucosal seal around endosseous dental implants: J Oral Implantol: 1981; 9: 357-371
  14. Gould TRL. Clinical implications of the attachment of oral tissue to permucosal implants. Tissue integration in oral and maxillo-facial reconstruction. Proceedings of an International Congress. Brussels: Excerpta Medica; 1985; 253-270
  15. McKinney RV, Steflik DE, Koth DL: Evidence for a junctional epithelial attachment to ceramic dental implants: J Periodontol: 1985; 56: 579-597
  16. Lindhe J, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, Liljenberg B, Marinello C: Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues: Clin Oral Impl Res: 1992; 3: 9-16
  17. Lang NP, Bragger U, Walther D, Beamer B, Komman KS: Ligature-induced peri-implant infection in cynomolgus monkey: Clin Oral Impl Res: 1993; 4: 2-11
  18. Shou S, Holmstrup P, Keiding NE: Microbiology of ligature-induced marginal inflammation around osseointegrated implants and ankylosed teeth in cynomolgus monkeys(Macaca fascicularis): Clin Oral Impl Res: 1996; 7: 190-200
  19. Marinello CP, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, Kinge B, Glantz PO, Lindhe J: Resolution of ligature-induced peri-implantitis lesion in the dog: J Clin Periodontol: 1995; 22: 475-479
  20. Tillmans H, Hermann JS, Tiffee JC, Burgess AV, Meffert RM: Evaluation of three different implants in ligature-induced peri-implantitis in the beagle dog. Part II. Histology and microbiology: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants: 1998; 13: 59-68
  21. Isidor E: Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants: Clin Oral Implants Res: 1996; 7: 143-152
  22. Isidor E: Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation: Clin Oral Implants Res: 1997; 8: 1-9
  23. Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR,Morrison E, Caffesse RG: Treatment of peri-implantitis using guided bone regeneration and bone grafts, alone or in combination, in beagle dogs. Part I: Clinical findings and histologic observation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants: 1995; 10: 474-484
  24. Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Schupbach P, Morrison E, Caffesse RG: Treatment of peri-implantitis using guided bone regeneration and bone grafts, alone or in combination, in beagle dogs. Part II: Histologic findings: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants: 1997; 12: 168-175
  25. Bair RE, Meyer AE: Implant surface preparation: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants: 1988; 3: 9-20
  26. Weaks LM, Lescher NB, Barnes CM,Holroyd SV: Clinical evaluation of The Prophy-jet (R) as an instrument for routine removal of tooth stain and plaque: J Periodontol: 1984; 55: 486-488
  27. Horning G: Clinical use of an sir-powder abrasive: Compend Contin Educ Dent: 1987; 8: 652-662
  28. Cooley RL, Brown FH, Lubow RM: Evaluation of air-powder abrasive prophylaxis unit: Gen Dent: 1990; 38: 24-27
  29. Barnes CM, Fleming LS, Muenninghoff LA: An SEM evaluation of the in-vivo effects of an air-abrasive system on various implant surfaces: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants: 1991; 6: 463-469
  30. Parham PL, Cobb CM, French AA, Love JW, Drisko CL, Killoy WJ: Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces: An in vitro evaluation: J Oral Implantol: 1989; 15: 78-86
  31. Dennison DK, Huerzeler MB, Quinones C, Caffesse RG: Contaminated implant surfaces: An in vitro comparison of implant surface coating and treatment madalities for decontamination: J Periodontol: 1994; 65: 942-948
  32. Zablotsky MH, Diedrich DL, Meffert RM: Detoxification of endotoxin-contaminated titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated surfaces utilizing various Chemotherapeutic and mechanical modalities: Implant Dent: 1992; 1: 154-158
  33. Zablotsky MH, Diedrich DL, Meffert RM, Wittrig E: The abiliry of various chemotherapeutic agents to detoxify the endotoxin infected HA-coated implant surface: Int J Oral Implant: 1991; 8: 45-51
  34. Albrektsson T, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J: Osseointegrated titanium implants-Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man: Acta Orthop scand 1981; 52: 155-170
  35. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR: The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review of proposed criteria of success: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants: 1986; 1: 11-25
  36. Meffert RM: The soft tissue interface in dental implantology: Int J Oral Implatol: 1988; 5: 55-58
  37. Meffert RM, Langer B, Fritz ME: Dental implant: A review: J Periodontol: 1992; 63: 859-870
  38. Klauber C, Lenz LJ, Henry PJ: Oxide thickness and surface contamination of six endosseous dental implants determined by electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis: A preliminary report: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants: 1990; 5: 264-271
  39. Kasemo B: Biocompatibility of titanium implants: Surface science aspects: J Prosthet Dent: 1983; 49:832-837
  40. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J: Biomaterial and implant surfaces: On the role of cleanliness contamination and preparation procedures: J Biomed Mater Res: Applied materials: 1988; 22:145-158
  41. Quirynen M, Bollen CML: The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man: A review literature: J Clin Periodontol: 1995; 22: 1-14
  42. Quirynen M, Van Der Mei C, Bollen CML, Schotte A, Marechal M, Doornbrusch GI: An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra-and subgingival plaque: J Dent Res: 1993; 72: 1304-1309
  43. Quirynen M, Van Der Mei C, Bollen CML, Van Den Bossche LH, Doornbrush GI, van Steenberghe D: The influence of surface-free energy on supragingival plaque microbiology: An in vivo study on implants: J Periodontol: 1994; 65: 162-167
  44. Newman MG, Flemmig TF: Periodontal considerations of implants and implant associated microbiota: J Dent Educ: 1988; 52: 737-744
  45. Lindhe J, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, Liljenberg B, Marinello C: Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues: Clin Oral Impl Res: 1992; 3: 9-16
  46. Newman MG, Flemmig TF: Periodontal considerations of implants and implants associated microbiota: Int J Oral Implantol: 1988; 5: 65-70
  47. Rosenberg ES,Torosian JP, Slots J: Microbial differences in two clinically distinct types of failures of osseointegrated implants: Clin Oral Impl Res: 1991; 2: 134-144
  48. Rapley JW, Swan RH, Hallmon WW, Mills MP: The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants: 1990; 5: 47-52
  49. Chairay JP, Boulekbache H, Jean A, Soyer A, Bouchard P: Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of effects of an air-abrasive system on dental implants: A comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces: J Periodontol: 1997; 68: 1215-1222
  50. Fox SC, Moriarry ID, Kusy RP. The effects of scaling titanium implant surfaces with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. J Periodontol: 1990; 61: 485-490