DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimization of active vibration control for random intelligent truss structures under non-stationary random excitation

  • Gao, W. (School of Electromechanical Engineering, Xidian University) ;
  • Chen, J.J. (School of Electromechanical Engineering, Xidian University) ;
  • Hu, T.B. (School of Electromechanical Engineering, Xidian University) ;
  • Kessissoglou, N.J. (School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, The University of New South Wales) ;
  • Randall, R.B. (School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, The University of New South Wales)
  • Received : 2003.01.13
  • Accepted : 2004.03.02
  • Published : 2004.08.25

Abstract

The optimization of active bars' placement and feedback gains of closed loop control system for random intelligent truss structures under non-stationary random excitation is presented. Firstly, the optimal mathematical model with the reliability constraints on the mean square value of structural dynamic displacement and stress response are built based on the maximization of dissipation energy due to control action. In which not only the randomness of the physics parameters of structural materials, geometric dimensions and structural damping are considered simultaneously, but also the applied force are considered as non-stationary random excitation. Then, the numerical characteristics of the stationary random responses of random intelligent structure are developed. Finally, the rationality and validity of the presented model are demonstrated by an engineering example and some useful conclusions are obtained.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdullah, M.A. (1998), "Optimal location and gains of feedback controllers at discrete locations", AIAA J., 36(11), 2109-2116. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.314
  2. Bathe, K.J. (1995), Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  3. Chen, G.S., Bruno, R.J. and Salama, M. (1991), "Optimal placement of active/passive members in structures using simulated annealing", AIAA J., 29(8), 1327-1334. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10739
  4. Chen, J.J. and Duan, B.Y. (1994), "Structural optimization by displaying the reliability constraints", Comput. Struct., 50(6), 777-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)90313-1
  5. Gao, W., Chen, J.J., Ma, H.B. and Ma, X.S. (2003), "Dynamic response analysis of closed loop control system for intelligent truss structures based on probability", Struct. Eng. Mech., 15(2), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2003.15.2.239
  6. Gao, W., Chen, J.J., Ma, H.B. and Ma, X.S. (2003), "Optimal placement of active bars in active vibration control for piezoelectric intelligent truss structures with random parameters", Comput. Struct., 81(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00331-0
  7. Jensen, H. and Iwan, W.D. (1992), "Response of system with uncertain parameters to stochastic excitation", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 118(5), 1012-1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:5(1012)
  8. Kaminski, M. (2001), "Stochastic finite element method homogenization of heat conduction problem in fiber composites", Struct. Eng. Mech., 11(4), 373-392. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.11.4.373
  9. Li, J. and Liao, S.T. (2002), "Dynamic response of linear stochastic structures under random excitation", Acta Mechanica Sinica, 34(3), 416-424.
  10. Liu, W.K., Besterfield, G. and Belytschko, T. (1988), "Transient probabilistic systems", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 67(1), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90067-9
  11. Peng, X.Q., Lam, K.Y. and Liu, G.R. (1998), "Active vibration control of composite beams with piezoelectrics: a finite element modal based on third order laminate theory", J. Sound Vib., 209(4), 635-650. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1997.1249
  12. Rao, S.S., Pan, T.S. and Venkayya, V.B. (1991), "Optimal placement of actuator in activiely controlled structures using genetic algorithms", AIAA J., 29(6), 942-943. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10683
  13. Singh, B.N., Yadav, D. and Iyengar, N.G.R. (2001), "Natural frequencies of composite plates with random material properties using higher-order shear deformation theory", Int. J. Mech. Sci., 43, 2193-2214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00046-7
  14. Suk, J., Boo, S. and Kim, Y. (2001), "Lyapunov control law for slew maneuver using time finite element analysis", J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 24(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4679
  15. Wall, F.J. and Bucher, C.G. (1987), "Sensitivity of expected rate of SDOP system response to statistical uncertainties of loading and system parameters", Prob. Eng. Mech., 2(3), 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-8920(87)90004-X
  16. Wang, Q. and Wang, C.M. (2001), "Controllability index for optimal design of piezoelectric actuators in vibration control of beam structures", J. Sound Vib., 242(3), 507-518. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3357
  17. Xu, K., Warnichai, P. and Igusa, T. (1994), "Optimal placement and gains of sensors and actuators for feedback control", J. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 17(5), 929-934. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21292
  18. Zhao, L. and Chen, Q. (2000), "Neumann dynamic stochastic finite element method of vibration for structures with stochastic parameters to random excitation", Comput. Struct., 77(6), 651-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00019-5

Cited by

  1. Path Transmissibility Analysis Considering Two Types of Correlations in Hydropower Stations vol.2013, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/802546
  2. Natural frequency and mode shape analysis of structures with uncertainty vol.21, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.05.007
  3. Design on a new oil well test shock absorber under impact load vol.28, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2008.28.3.335
  4. Disturbance analysis of hydropower station vertical vibration dynamic characteristics: the effect of dual disturbances vol.53, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.53.2.297