Application and Use of Land Quality Ratings in the Valuation of Agricultural Land:An Evaluation of the South Dakota Experience

농지평가에 있어서 토질등급의 이용과 적용 ; 사우스다코다주의 사례

  • ;
  • 정덕영 (충남대학교 생물환경화학과) ;
  • 심호영 (충남대학교 생물환경화학과)
  • Received : 2004.07.23
  • Accepted : 2004.08.09
  • Published : 2004.08.30

Abstract

The development of land classification and soil productivity rating systems (SPR) are examined for their application to valuation of agricultural land in South Dakota, USA. For current and impending environmental and agricultural land issues, there is virtually no hard data available. Therefore, the study works with government and private sector clients to identify needs, and develop and apply a variety of techniques to mine data and carry out appropriate assessment methods. The application of SPR data to land valuation work conducted by real estate appraisers, tax assessors, and economists are discussed along with an assessment of its benefits and limitations. However, the actual value of the agricultural land can be determined by fulfilling the agricultural's vision of protecting and improving the environment by agricultural activities besides the safe food production. Therefore, it is increasingly important that we understand the impacts of farming and forestry on land, water and air.

미국의 South Dakoda주에서는 농지 평가를 위하여 토양생산등급체계와 토양분류를 점토하였다. 현재 그리고 앞으로 우리가 직면할 환경과 농업토양과 관련한 문제에 대하여, 우리가 실질적으로 쉽게 획득할 자료는 많지 않다. 그러므로 적절한 평가방법을 수행하고 자료를 발굴하기 하기 위하여 다양한 기술을 개발적용하고, 그리고 필요를 확인하기 위하여 정부와 민간분야의 의뢰인들이 같이 연구하였다. 세무관련자, 부동산평가인 등이 토양생산등급체계를 토지가격작업에 적용하였다. 그리고 경제학자들은 이를 농지의 이익과 제한요인과 함께 검토하였다 농지의 실질적 가격은 토지로터 안전농산물을 생산하는 것 외에 농업활동에 의한 환경개선이나 보호에 대한 농업의 전망을 충족시키는가에 의해 결정되어야 한다. 그러므로 우리는 모두 토양, 물, 대기가 농업이나 산림에 미치는 영향력을 이해하는 것이 더 중요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Janssen, L. 1999. Agricultural land values in South Dakota: a comparison of two surveys. South Dakota State University Econ. Res. Report #1. Brookings, SD, USA
  2. Janssen, L. 1988. Agricultural land values in South Dakota, 1975-1987. South Dakota State University Econ. Res. Annual Report 99. Brookings, SD, USA
  3. Janssen, L. 1987. Evaluation of cross-sectional studies of agricultural land markets. South Dakota State University Econ. Res. Report. Brookings, SD, USA
  4. Janssen, L. and Haque, M. 1986. An econometric analyses of farmland sale prices in South Dakota. Tech. Bull. 797. South Dakota State University Ag. Expt. Station, Brookings, SD, USA
  5. Malo, D. D. 1999. Soil productivity ratings and estimated yields for Brookings county, South Dakota. Tech. Bull. South Dakota State University Plant Science Dept., Brookings, SD, USA
  6. Malo, D. D., and F. C. Westin. 1978. Rating South Dakota soils according to productivity. Bull. 657. South Dakota State University Ag. Expt. Station, Brookings, SD, USA
  7. Swinson, C. 1984. An economic analysis of farmland values in South Dakota. MS Thesis, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA
  8. Westin, F. C., and D. D. Malo, 1978. Soils of South Dakota. Bull. 656. South Dakota State University Ag. Expt. Station, Brookings, SD, USA