Assessment of Advanced Joining Technologies for Metal Pipe in the Construction Industry

  • Kim Chang-Wan (Breakthrough Strategy Committee, Construction Industry Institute, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin)
  • 발행 : 2004.04.01

초록

Pipe joining is one of the most critical aspects of most industrial projects, but it is regarded as one of the most inefficient processes in the construction industry. The primary objective of this paper is to explore the applicability of advanced joining technology to the use of metal pipe in the construction industry. This paper begins with a review of current practices with respect to metal joining in the construction industry. The current status of pipe joining is examined. Needs for, and benefits of, advanced joining technology are identified, and a tool for evaluating the applicability of various methods to construction is presented. Joining technologies, including mechanical joining, adhesive bonding, welding, and welding automation, are then introduced, and their applicability to the construction industry is assessed by means of this evaluation tool. It is concluded that there is significant benefits for improvement of piping process in the construction industry through the use of advanced joining technologies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 3M Inc. (2002), (Jan. 2002)
  2. Ageorges, C., Ye, L., and Hou, M. (2001), Advances in Fusion Bonding Techniques for Joining Thermoplastic Matrix Composites, Composites: Part A, 32 (4), pp. 839-857
  3. Brandon, D., and Kaplan, W. (1997), Joining Processes: An Introduction, John Wiley & Sons,New York, NY
  4. Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2002), Bench Marking and Metrics Data, Construction Industry Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
  5. Davies, A. (1993), The Science and Practice of Welding, Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
  6. Eager, T. (1990), Joining Technology, Advanced Materials & Processes, 148(3),p. 65-66
  7. Kim C. and Haas, C. (2003), New Joining Technology for Metal Pipe in the Construction Industry, BTSC Document 2003-1, Construction Industry Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
  8. Kluger, J.(2000), Coming up Next Joining, Time, 156(23), p. 56
  9. Lea, R., Stubblefield, M., and Pang, S. (1998), Innovative Development of Joining/Fitting Technology for Advanced Composite Piping System, Final ATP Technical Report, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NlST)
  10. Messler, R. (1993), Joining of Advanced Materials, Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham, MA
  11. Rickard, J.,and Tucker,R. (1982), Construction Activities with Significant Technological Research Opportunities, Construction Industry Cost Effectiveness Project Report The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
  12. Saaty, T.L., (1990). Multi-criteria Decision Making - The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Volume I, AHP Series, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
  13. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G., and Wendell, R.E. (1983), Assessing Attribute Weights by Ratio, OMEGA, 11(1), pp. 9-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(83)90078-6
  14. Silverman, E.M. (1989), Joining Methods for Graphite/Peek Thermoplastic Composites, SAMPE Journal, 25(5), pp.34-39
  15. Thompson, G. (1998), An Engineer's Guide to Pipe Joints, Professional Engineering Publishing, Suffolk, UK
  16. Tucker, R (1982), Construction Technology Needs and Priorities, Construction Industry Cost Effectiveness Project Report, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX