Electron Microscopic Study of Osseointegration between Bone and Smooth Machined Implants

선반가공 임플란트와 골조직의 유착에 관한 전자현미경적 연구

  • 장병수 (한서대학교 보건학부 피부미용학과)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

This paper reports that the ultrastructural nature of the interface process between the implants and surrounding bone has been studied after in vivo 1, 4, 8, 12 weeks of implantation of smooth machined implants into rabbit tibias. There was no indication of the fibrous connective tissue formation around the implant that imply intolerance of the bone tissue towards the implant after 1 week of implantation. The regions showing direct bone tissue bonding to the smooth machined implant contained osteoblast activating across the interface in the direction after 4 weeks of implantation. The reaction of a smooth machined implant caused in the first instance formation of an amorphous woven bone, which transformed into a mineralized bone containing collagen fibers. After 8 weeks of implantation, the activities of osteoblast initiated osseointegration forming bone matrix at the interface. During this period, the osteoblast surrounded with a matrix consisting of collagen bundles running in various directions. In the interface area between newly formed bone tissue and implants which has been inserted in rabbit tibias for 12 weeks, the implant and mineralized bone was separated by an amorphous electron dense material layer about $1{\sim}1.5{\mu}m$ in thickness.

본 연구는 토끼의 경골에 선반가공 임플란트를 식립한 후 1, 4, 8, 12주가 경과한 다음 적출하여 골조직이 임플란트에 접촉되는 과정의 미세구조적 특성을 연구하였다. 임플란트 매식 후 임플란트에 대한 골조직의 유착을 방해하는 섬유성 결합조직의 형성은 일어나지 않았다. 4주가 경과된 조직표본의 골과 임플란트가 직접 접촉하는 부위에서 골모세포가 활성화되어 골조직과 임플란트의 직접적인 유착이 일어나기 시작하였다. 임플란트와 접하는 부위의 조직에는 가골이 형성되었고 이어서 교원섬유와 무기질이 침착되면서 광화가 진행되었다. 8주 경과된 조직에서 활성화된 골모세포는 임플란트의 접촉면에 골기질을 합성하여 골과 임플란트의 유착이 진행되었다. 이 시기에 골모세포는 골기질에 둘러싸였고, 골기질은 여러 방향으로 종주하는 교원섬유를 가지고 있었다. 12주가 경과된 조직표본에서 새롭게 형성되어 광화된 골조직과 임플란트는 두께가 약 $1{\sim}1.5{\mu}m$인 무정형의 전자밀도가 높은 물질층에 의해서 분리되어 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T, Branema PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J: Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a ling lasting, direct bone to implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 55 : 155 170, 1981
  2. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L: Direct bone anchorage of rat implants: Clinical and experimental considerations of the concept of osseointegration. Parodontol 1 : 307 320, 1990
  3. Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Lundgren AK, SuI Y, Gottlow J: Experimental studies on oxidized implants. A histomorphometrical and biomechanical analysis. Appl Osseointegration Res 1 : 21-24, 2001
  4. Cook SD, Salkeld SL, Patron LP, Sargent MC, Rueger DC: Healing course of primate ulna segmental defects treated with osteogenic protein 1. J Investigative Sur 15 : 69 79, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1080/08941930290085822
  5. Davides JE, Lowenberg B, Shiga, A: The bone titanium interface in vitro. J Biomed Mat Res 24 : 1289 1306, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820241003
  6. De Aza PN, Luklinska ZB, Martinez A, Anseau MR, Guitian F, De Aza S: Morphological and structural study of pseudowollastonite implants in bone. J Microsc 197 : 60 67, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00647.x
  7. De Aza PN, Luklinska ZB, Anseau MR, Guitian F, De Aza S: Transmission electron microscopy of the interface between bone and pseudowollastonite implant. J Microsc 201 : 33 43, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00779.x
  8. De Leonardis D, Garg AK, Pecora GE: Osseointegration of rough acid etched titanium implants: 5 year follow up of 100 minimatic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 14 : 384 391, 1999
  9. De Maeztu MA, Alava J, Gay Escoda C: Ion implantation: surface treatment for improving the bone integration of titanium and Ti6Al4V dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 14 : 57 62, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140108.x
  10. Donath K, Breuner GAA: Method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissue. J Oral Pathol 11 : 318 325, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x
  11. Donath K: Preparation of histological sections by cutting grinding technique for hard tissue and other material not suitable to be sectioned by routine methods. Equipment and mathodical perfarmance. EXAKT Kulzer Publication, Norderstedt. 1 16, 1990
  12. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL: A human histological analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J periodontics Restorative Dent 19 : 117 129, 1999
  13. Marinho VC, Celletti R, Bracchetti G, Petrone G, Minkin C and Piattelli A: Sandblasted and acid etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 : 75 81, 2003
  14. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A: Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Impl 28 : 2 8, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0002:BRTMAR>2.3.CO;2
  15. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Burgos PM, Gottlow J, Sennerby L: Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: light microscopic observations after 5 to 9 months of loading in the posterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5 : 88 98, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00020.x
  16. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericsson L: A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium Implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 7 : 62 71, 1992
  17. Trisi P, Lazzara R, Rao W, Rebaudi A: Bone implant contact and bone quality: evaluation of expected and actual bone contact on machined and osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 22 : 535 545, 2002
  18. Trisi P, Lassara R, Rebaudi A, Rao W, Testori T, Porter SS: Bone implant contact on machined and dual acid etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol 74 : 945 956, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.945