한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제24권1호
  • /
  • Pages.29-47
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지

Reaching Beyond the Science Education Guidelines: Project-Centered Approaches

  • 발행 : 2004.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Two project-centered secondary school programs were studied as part of an effort to elucidate successful components for science reform-based curriculum development. The Teachers for Exciting Science (TES), and Foundational Approaches in Science Teaching (FAST) programs in Korea and U.S., respectively, are project-centered programs because their curricula are centered on the activities initiated and engaged in by the students. Students serve as principal investigators in their projects, and teachers serve as guides. Both programs were analyzed based on criteria such as curriculum design, teaching, lives of students, lives of teachers, evaluation of program, from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). In the programs, teachers and students directed the development of curricula and their implementation. Students assumed teacher roles as mentors of other students. And emphasis was on development of communication skills through student-delivered talks and written papers, and professional development of teachers as educators and scientists. Participation in TES stimulated secondary school student interest in science, encouraged inquiry thinking, increased achievement in learning science, and promoted better awareness of science related to real life. FAST students practice laboratory and field techniques, experimental design, hypothesis formation, generalization, and practical implications of research as academic and applied disciplinarians. These project-centered programs have been successfully implemented in field, lab, and classroom curricula for secondary science education. Comparison of these programs will provide an opportunity for identifying key elements instrumental in successful implementation of guidelines for science education, as measured through successful outcomes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allen, L. R. (1977). Foundational Approaches in Science Teaching (FAST). Science Curriculum Inventory, Curriculum Research & Development Group, University of Hawaii
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press
  3. Anholt, R. R. H. (1994, December 12). A successful presentation can enhance a scientific career. The Scientist, 22-23
  4. Bradley, A. (2000). Union heads issue standards warning. Education Week, 19(42), 1, 20-21
  5. Chisman, D. G. (1990). What is integrated science teaching: its beginnings and its place today. New Trends in Integrated Science, Volume VI. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  6. Choi, K., Cho, Y. & Cho, D. (1998). A study of the middle school science curriculum to enhance creative problem-solving abilities. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 18(2), 149-160
  7. CRDG (2000). Foundational Approaches in Science Teaching (FAST): A summary of education. Curriculum Research & Development Group (CRDG), University of Hawaii
  8. Dekkers (1978). The effects of junior inquiry science programs on student cognitive and activity preferences in science. Research in Science Education, 8, 71-78 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02558678
  9. Dowling, K. W., Benson, J., Chandler, A., & Bethke, E. (1992). A guide to curriculum planning science. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
  10. Ellis, A. K. & Fouts, J. T. (1997). Research on educational innovations. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc
  11. Feher, E. (1990). Interactive museum exhibits as tools for learning: Explorations with light. International Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 35-49 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069900120104
  12. Friedman, A. J. (1995). Creating an academic home for informal science education. Curator, 38 (4)
  13. Galen, D. F. (1993). Science fair: A successful venture. American Biology Teacher, 55(8), 464-467 https://doi.org/10.2307/4449716
  14. Gore, K., Pogrow, s. (1991). Middle School Exemplary Curricula: Top-rated thinking-in-content curricula for all middle school students. Middle school Curriculum Review Series, University of Arizona
  15. Gowen, L. F., & Marek, E. A. (1993). Science fairs: Step by step. The Science Teacher, 37-40
  16. Holman, J. (1990). The integration of science teaching through science-technology-society courses. In UNESCO (Ed.) New trends in integrated science teaching, Volume VI. pp. 48-52. UNESCO
  17. Jones, G. (1991). Gender differences in science competitions. Science Education, 75(2), 159-167 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750202
  18. Kentucky Department of Education (1997). Result-based practices showcase. Frankfurt, NY: Kentucky Department of Education (KDE)
  19. Kim, B., Kwon, J., Kim, H., Paik, S., Chung, W., & Choi, B. (1997). Developments of the 7th science curriculum revision. Seoul, Korea: Korea National University of Education
  20. King, A. R. & Brownell, J. (1966). The curriculum and the disciplines of knowledge. New York, NY: J. Wiley & Sons
  21. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
  22. Noh, T., Cha, J., Kim, C., & Choi, Y. (1998). The effect of computer-assisted instruction using molecular-level animation in middle-school science class. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 18(2), 161-171
  23. National Staff Development Council (1999). Consumer's guide to result-based staff development for the middle grades. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council (NSDC)
  24. Pak, S.(1997). Challenging conceptions of science teaching. In B.Yi, H. Seo, D. Choi, J. Kim, M. Hong, Y. Kim, Y. Lee, S. Choe, and R. Yager (Eds.) Globalization of science education-moving toward worldwide science education standards. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science Education. pp. 95-104. Seoul, Korea: Korean Educational Development Institute
  25. Pauls, J., Young, D. B., & Lapikova, V. (1999). Laboratory for Learning. The Science Teacher, 66(1), 27-29
  26. Russell, R. L. (1996). The role of science museums in teacher education. Informal science, July/August, Washington DC: The Informal Science Review
  27. Shelly, N. (1989). Student Evaluations of FAST at Warren Glen Middle School. Pohatong School District, Bloomsbury, New Jersey
  28. Son, Y. & Lee, H. (1999). A theoretical study to formulate the direction of integrated science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 19(1), 41-61
  29. Son, Y., Pottenger, F. M., King, A., Young, D. B., & Choi, D. (2001). Theory and Practice of Curriculum Design for Integrated Science Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(1), 231-254
  30. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. Schwab & P. Brandwein (Eds.). The teaching of science, pp. 1-103. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  31. Third International Mathematics and Science Study (1997). TIMSS: a sourcebook of 8th-grade findings. Philadelphia, PA: Mid- Atlantic Eisenhower Consortium for Mathematics and Science Education
  32. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Research and Improvement (1994). Promising practices in mathematics and science education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
  33. U.S. Department of Education (1998). Catalog of School Reform Models: First Edition. Prepared by the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory with assistance from the Education Commission of the States, Contract number RJ9006501
  34. Watson, C. R. (1999). Best practices from America's middle schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education
  35. White, B. Y. & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
  36. Yamamoto, K. K. (1996). Against All Odds: Tales of Survival and Growth of the Foundational Approaches in Science Teaching (FAST) Project. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Stanford University
  37. Young, D. B. & Pottenger, F. M. (1992). Instructional guide: FAST, foundational approaches in science teaching. Honolulu, HI: Curriculum Research & Development Group, University of Hawaii
  38. Young, D. B. (1997). Science as inquiry: transforming science education. In A.L. Costa & R.M. Lieberman (Eds.), Envisioning process as content: toward a renaissance curriculum. PP. 120-139. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc
  39. Young, D. B. (1998). Standards-Based Teacher Education Through Partnerships (STEP). Office of Research Services, Final Performance Report: Award number R215J40238-96
  40. Young, D. B. (1999). Foundational Approaches in Science Teaching (FAST): Ideas that work science professional development. Eisenhower National Clearinghouse for Mathematcis and Science Education, 58-59
  41. Young, D. B. (2000a). The strategies of teaching and evaluation in integrated science education. Korea Association for Reseatch in Science Education/Korea National University of Education. 200-230
  42. Young, D. B. (2000b). Foundational approaches in science teaching: a summary of evaluations. Honolulu, HI: Curriculum Research & Development Group, University of Hawaii
  43. Young, D. B., Pottenger, F. M., King, A. R. (2000). Research, Development, and Dissemination in Integrated Science Education. International Conference on Theory and practice of integrated science education. Korea Assocation for Research in Science Education/Korea National University of Education, 251-294