A Suggestion of Cognitive Model of Scientific Creativity (CMSC)

과학적 창의성 모델의 제안 -인지적 측면을 중심으로-

  • Published : 2004.04.30

Abstract

Creative thinking alone can not lead to scientific creativity. Scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry skills are needed for scientific creativity. Focused only on cognitive aspect, I suggested a cognitive model of scientific creativity (CMSC) consisting of 3 components: thinking for scientific creativity, scientific knowledge contents, and scientific inquiry skills. Recently, many researchers have emphasized the various thinking for creativity as well as divergent thinking. Therefore, I suggested three types of creative thinking - divergent thinking, convergent thinking, and associational thinking - and discussed its rationale. Based on this model, an example of activity material for the scientific creativity was suggested. In the further research, based on CMSC, various activity types related to scientific creativity and concrete learning materials for scientific creativity will be developed.

과학적 창의성은 창의적 사고만으로 발현될 수 없으며, 과학지식내용과 과학적 탐구기능이 함께 사용되게 마련이다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 과학적 창의성을 위한 사고, 과학지식내용, 과학적 탐구기능의 3 요소로 구성된 인지적 측면에서의 과학적 창의성 모델을 제안하였다. 그리고 모델의 공통요소로 가치, 독창성, 정교성을 포함시켰다. 최근에는 발산적 사고가 곧 창의적 사고라고 보기보다는, 과학적 창의성에 여러 가지 다양한 사고가 필요하다고 강조해왔다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 논의들에 기초하여, 과학적 창의성을 위한 사고로 발산적 사고, 수렴적 사고, 그리고 연관적 사고를 제안하였다. 인지적 측면의 과학적 창의성 모델에 기초하여 구체적인 과학적 창의성 활동 예시를 제시하고, 어떻게 활동자료가 개발될 수 있는지에 대한 제언을 하였다. 앞으로 연구에서는 구체적으로 다양한 과학적 창의성 활동유형을 정의하고, 유형별 학습지도자료를 개발하게 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부 (1997). 고등학교 교육과정 (I): 교육부 고시 제1997-15호 (p. 334). 서울: 대한교과서 주식회사
  2. 김영채(2001). 창의적 문제해결: 창의력의 이론, 개발과 수업, 교육과학사
  3. 박종원(1998). 과학활동에서 연역적 사고의 역할. 한국과학교육학회지 18(1), 1-17
  4. 박종원(2000). 학생의 과학적 설명가설의 생성과정 분석- 과학적 가설의 정의와 특성을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(4), 667-679
  5. 박종원(2001). 학생의 과학적 설명가설의 생성과정 분석- 대학생 반응 분석을 중심으로- 한국과학교육학회지21(3), 609-621
  6. 박종원(2002). 개념체계의 연속적 세련화와 정교화를 통한 개념 변화 분석 - 이론적 논의를 중심으로-. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(2), 357-377
  7. 우종옥, 이경훈, 이항로(1994). 과학교육학 목표에 관한 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 14(2), 159-169
  8. Alexander, P. A.(1992). Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. Educational Psychology, 27, 33-51 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_4
  9. Baer, J.(1999). Domains of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds,) Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 591-596). Londin: Academic Press
  10. Chalmers, A. F.(1978). What is this thing called science? Open University Press
  11. Cropley, A. J.(1999). Definition of creativity. In In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 511-524). Londin. Academic Press
  12. Cropley, A. J., & Urban, K. K.(2000). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, and R. F. Subotnik (Eds.) International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 485-498). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd
  13. Diakidoy I-A. N., & Constantinou, C. P.(2001). Creativity in physics: Response fluency and task specificity
  14. Dunbar, K(1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B Ward, S. M. Smith and J. Vaid (eds) Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association), 461-494
  15. Feldhusen, J. F.(1995). Creativity: a knowledge base, metacognitive skills, and personality factors. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 255-268 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1995.tb01399.x
  16. Feldhusen, J. F., & Clinkenbeard, P. R.(1986). creativity instructional materials: A review of research. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 153-182 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00435.x
  17. Gardner, H.(1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence. New York: Basic Books
  18. Gruber, H. E.(1989). Networks of enterprise in scientific creativity. In B. Gholson, W. R. Shadish, Jr., R A. Neimeyer, & A.C. Houts. (Eds.) Psychology of Science: Contributions to metascience (pp.246-265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  19. Guilford, J. P.(1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040755
  20. Guildford, J. P.(1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: EDITS
  21. Hanson, N. R.(1961). Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  22. Harrington, D. M., Block, J., & Block, J. H.(1983). Predicting creativity in preadolescence from divergent thinking in early childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 609-623 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.609
  23. Hu, W., & Adey, P.(2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
  24. Holyoak, K J. & Thagard, P.(1999). Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought (London: The MIT Press)
  25. Engle, D. E., Mah, J. J., & Sadri, G.(1997). An empirical comparison of entrepreneurs and employees: Implications for innovation. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 45-49 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1001_5
  26. Jackson, P. W., & Messnick, S.(1967). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. In J. Kagan (ed.), Creativity and Learning (pp. 1-19). Boston: Houghton Mifflin
  27. Kuhn, T. S,(1977). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  28. Langley, P., Simon, H. A, Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkow, J. M.(1987). Scientific Discovery: Computational explorations of the creative processes. London: The MIT Press
  29. Lawson, A. E.(1995). Science Teaching and Development of Thinking (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company)
  30. Maier, N. R. F.(1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problems and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 181-194 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071361
  31. Mansfield, R S., & Busse, T. V.(1981). The psychology of creativity: scientists and their work. Chicago: Nelson-Hall
  32. McComark, A. J., & Yager, R E.(1989). A new taxanomy of science education, Science Teacher, 56(2), 47-48
  33. Miller, A. I.(1996). Metaphors in creative scientific thought. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 113-130 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0902&3_2
  34. Millar, A. I.(2000). Insights of Genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. London: The MIT Press
  35. Novak, J. & Gowin, B.(1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press
  36. Park, Jongwon & Kim, Ikgyun.(2002). Analysis of the students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypothesis. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Australasian Science Education Research Association, Cairns, Australia
  37. Park, Jongwon, & Sooja, Han.(2002). Deductive reasoning to promote the change of concept about force and motion. International Journal of Science Education. 24(6), 593-610 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110074026
  38. Park, Jongwon, Kim, Ikgyun, Kim, Myungwhan, & Lee, Moo.(2001), Analysis of the students' processes of confirmation and falsification of the hypotheses in electrostatics. International Journal of Science Education. 23(12), 1219-1236 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049097
  39. Peirce, C. S.(1955). Abduction and induction. In J. Buchler (ed.) Philosophical Writings of Peirce (New York: Dover Publications, INC), 150-156
  40. Rebaglia, A.(1999). Scientific discovery: Between incommensurability of paradigms and historical continuity. Foundations of Science, 4, 337-354 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009696428623
  41. Renzulli, J. S.(1978). What makes giftedness? reexamining a definition, Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 180-184
  42. Rothenberg, A.(1996), The Janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9(2,3), 207-231 https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.1996.9651173
  43. Root-Bernstein, R.(1999). Discovery. In In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 559-571). Londin: Academic Press
  44. Runco, M. A.(1999). Divergent thinking. In In M. A. Runco & S. R Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 577-682). Londin. Academic Press
  45. Sternberg, R. J.(1996). Successful Intelligence. New York: Basic Books
  46. Sternberg, R. J.(1999). Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  47. Song, Jinwoong, Park, Jongwon, Kwon, Sunggi, & Chung, Byunghoon.(2001). Idealization in Physics: Its types, roles and implications to physics learning. In Pinto, R, & Surinach, S. (Eds,), Physics Teacher Education Beyond 2000. (pp. 359-366). Paris: Elsevier
  48. Thagard, P.(1997). Coherent and creative conceptual combinations. In T. B Ward, S. M. Smith and J. Vaid (Eds) Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association), 129-141
  49. Walberg, H. J., & Stariha, W. E.(1992). productive human capital: learning, creativity and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 323-341 https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419209534445
  50. Ward, T. B., Saunders, K. N., & Dodds, R A.(1999). Creative cognition in gifted adolescents. Roeper Review, 21, 260-266 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553973
  51. Weisberg, R W.(1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: Freeman
  52. Wolpert, L.(1992). The Unnatural Nature of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press